Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using virtual reality for professional training practices: exploring the factors of applying stereoscopic 3D technologies in knowledge transfer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current research has constantly highlighted the significance of developing a learning culture with a robust knowledge sharing and transfer process in knowledge-based societies. The emergence of stereoscopic 3D virtual technologies provides organizations with an opportunity to develop immersive and virtual professional training practices for employees’ transformative learning. This research gathered data from a survey of 326 respondents to investigate employees’ virtual learning experiences in a virtual learning environment (VLE). The results show that a successful VLE model could possibly enhance employees’ learning motivation, process and satisfaction. The empirical evidence of this research suggests that there are three key components of framework for actual implementation; they are (1) the careful selection of VLE; (2) the appropriate design of pedagogical strategies; and (3) the effective use of virtual stimuli which involves the factors of the stereoscopic 3D visualization, telepresence and multisensory interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afonso AP (2006) Communities as context providers for web-based learning. In: Figueiredo AD, Afonso AP (eds) Managing learning in virtual settings: the role of context. Information Science Pub, Hershey

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information System Research 9:2. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amitabh A, Sinha S (2012) The learning continuum: formal and informal learning experiences—enabling learning and creation of new knowledge in an organization. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning 5(2):10–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EG Jr, Lewis K (2014) A dynamic model of individual and collective learning amid disruption. Organ Sci 25(2):356–376. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1985) Strategy, change, and defensive routines. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ Sci 22(5):1123–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: theory, method and practice. Addison-Wesley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schon DA (1996) Organizational learning II. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SE (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ Sci 23(5):1485–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkur G, Varambally KVM, Rodrigues LLR (2007) Insurance sector dynamics: towards transformation into learning organization. Learn Organ 14(6):510–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechky B (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities. Organ Sci 14(3):312–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker BE, Huselid MA (2006) Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here? J Manage 32(6):898–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Biocca F (1997) Cyborg’s Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments. J Comput Mediat Commun 3:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Blascovich J, Bailenson J (2006) Immersive virtual environments and education simulations. In: Cohen S, Portney KE, Rehberger D, Thorsen C (eds) Virtual decisions: digital stimulations for teaching reasoning in the social sciences and humanities. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 229–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogusevschi D, Muntean C, Muntean G (2020) Teaching and learning physics using 3D virtual learning environment: a case study of combined virtual reality and virtual laboratory in secondary school. J Comput Math Sci Teach 39(1):5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau MC, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Organ Sci 16(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeouis LJ (1984) Strategic management and determinism. Manage Rev 9:586–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR (2000) How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS (2003) Foreword: innovating innovation open innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown A, Starkey K (2000) Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Acad Manage Rev 25(1):102–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bujak KR, Radu L, Catrambone R, Maclntyre B, Zheng R, Golubski G (2013) A psuchological perspective on augmented reality in mathematics classroom. Comput Educ 68:536–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson JS, Reagans RE (2011) Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organ Sci 22(5):1182–1194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeron K (2005) Organizational effectiveness: Its demise and re-emergence through positive organizational scholarship. In: Smith KG et al (eds) Great Minds in Management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 304–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Castronova E (2005) Synthetic worlds: the business and culture of online games. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Castronova E (2007) Exodus to the virtual world. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Charturvedi AR, Dolk DR, Drnevich PL (2011) Design principles for virtual worlds. MIS Quarterly 35(3):673–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniawska F, Potter G (2001) Business in a virtual world: exploiting information for competitive advantage. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekleva S, Drehmer D (2001) Measuring software engineering evolution: a rash calibration. Inf Syst Res 8(1):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (1986) Out of the crisis: quality, productivity and competitive position. Cambridge University, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Maggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Serio A, Ibáñez MB, Kloos CD (2013) Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput Educ 68:586–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson M (1993) Organizational learning: a review of some literatures. Organ Stud 14(3):375–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2005) Think, play, do: technology, innovation and organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2007) “In case of fire, please use the elevator”: Simulation technology and organization in fire engineering. Organ Sci 18(5):849–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson M, Gann DM, Phillips M (2013) Organizational learning and the technology of foolishness: the case of virtual worlds at IBM. Organ Sci 24(5):1358–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy TM, Cunningham DJ (2000) Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In: Jonassen DH (ed) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. Macmillan, New York, pp 170–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith M, Crossan M, Nicolini D (2000) Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. J Manage Stud 37(6):783–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Admin Sci Quarterly 44(2):350–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimear R, Poole C (2019) Impact of virtual learning environment on students’ satisfaction, engagement, recall, and retention. J Med Imag Radiat Sci 50(3):408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marketer (2019) Virtual and augmented reality users 2019: VR slows as AR grows. Retrieved on Jun 11, 2020, from https://www.emarketer.com/content/virtual-and-augmented-reality-users-2019

  • Entwistle NJ (2009) Teaching for understanding at university: deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farago J, Skyrme D (1995) The learning organization. Retrieved Jan 13, 2016, from http://www.skyrme.com/insights/31rnorg.htm.

  • Fetscherin M, Latteman C, Lang G (2008) Virtual worlds research: a conceptual primer. J Electron Commerce Res 9(3):192–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger M, Brand SB (1999) The concept of the Learning Organization applied to the transformation of the public sector. In: Esterby-Smith M, Araujo L, Burgoyne J (eds) Organizational learning and the learning organization. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore AM, Kim J, Lee H (2005) Effect of image interactivity technology on consumer responses toward the online retailer. J Interact Market 19(3):38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillion G, Ekionea JPB, Plaisent M, Bernard P (2014) Using the soft system methodology for designing an integrated and inter-firm knowledge management capabilities maturity model in health care organization. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Informatics and Advanced Computing (ICIAC-14), Dec. 30–21, 2014 Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Fortin DR, Dholakia RR (2005) Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. J Business Res 58(3):387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard RB (2000) Constructivism, hypermedia, and the world wide web. Cyber Psychol Behav 3:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garau M (2006) Selective fidelity: Investigating priorities for the creation of expressive avatars. In: Schoeder R, Axelsson A (eds) Avatars at work and play. Springer, London, pp 17–38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg SL, Knerr W (1997) Collective training in virtual environments: Exploring performance requirements for dismounted soldier simulation. In: Seidel RJ, Chatelier PR, NATO Defense Research Group (eds) Virtual reality, training’s future?: perspectives on virtual reality and related emerging technologies. Plenum Press, New York, pp 41–45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan V, Kopalle PK, Danneels E (2011) The effect of mainstream and emerging customer orientations on radical and disruptive innovations. J Prod Innovat Manage 28(S1):121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandy G, Holton J (2010) Mobilizing change in a business school using appreciative inquiry. Learn Organ 17(2):178–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeter C (1992) Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence 1(2):262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemp P (2006) Avatar-based marketing. Harvard Business Rev 84(6):48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Heorhiadi A, La Venture K, Conbere JP (2014) What do organizations need to learn to become a learning organization? OD Practitioner 46(2):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman DL, Novak TP (1997) Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments, conceptual foundations. J Market 60(3):50–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hue P et al (1997) Virtual reality training simulator for long time flight. In: Seidel RJ, Chatelier PR, NATO Defense Research Group (eds) Virtual reality, training’s future?: perspectives on virtual reality and related emerging technologies. Plenum Press, New York, pp 69–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs WN (1993) Taking flight: dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning. Organ Dyn 22(2):24–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaaron A, Backhouse C (2017) Operationalising “double-loop” learning in service organisations: a systems approach for creating knowledge. Syst Practice Action Res 30(4):317–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson M (2006) Questing for knowledge—virtual worlds as dynamic processes of social interaction. In: Schoeder R, Axelsson A (eds) Avatars at work and play. Springer, London, pp 209–255

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Potter WD (1994) A computer microworld to introduce students to probability. J Comput Math Sci Teach 13(2):197–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D, Damian D, Tzanetakis G (2020) Evaluating the effectiveness of mixed reality music instrument learning with the theremin. Virtual Real 24:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH (1999) Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional design theories and models: a new paradigm of instructional theory. In: Reigeluth CM (ed) Mahwah. Lawarence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, NJ, pp 215–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane G, Alavi M (2007) Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organ Sci 18(5):796–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SC, Morris SS, Snell SA (2007) Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and human value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Acad Manage Rev 32(1):236–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareem J (2016) The influence of leadership in building a learning organization. IUP J Organ Behav 15(1):7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan R (2000) What “form” transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. In: Mezirow J (ed) Learning as transformation. Jossey-Bass, San Franciso, pp 35–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg RT, Whiteford AP (2009) Training advanced writing skills: the case for deliberative practice. Educat Psychol 44(4):250–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly PR (1997) Transfer of learning from a computer simulation as compared to a laboratory activity. J Edu Technol Syst 26(4):345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khlasisang J, Songkram N (2019) Designing a virtual learning environment system for teaching twently first century skills to higher education students in ASEAN. Technol Knowl Learn 24:41–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T, Biocca F (1997) Telepresence via television: two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. J Comput Mediat Commun 3:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Suh KS, Lee UK (2013) Effects of collaborative online shopping on shopping experience through social and relational perspectives. Inf Manage 50(4):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein LR (2003) Creating virtual product experience: the role of telepresence. J Interact Market 17(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler T, Fueller J, Matzler K, Stieger D (2011) Co-creation in virtual worlds: the design of the user experience. MIS Quarterly 35(3):773–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler T, Matzler K, Fuller J (2009) Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation. Technovation 29(6–7):395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE (2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educat Psychol 41(2):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe JJ (1998) La 5ème discipline: l’organisation apprenante. Syllabus de cours, Faculté des sciencesdel’éducation, Université

  • Lau KW (2008) Creativity training in higher design education. Des J 12(2):153–170

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lau KW (2016) A learning organization through the use of series games: a study of employees’ training strategies for digital native. Int J Knowl Manage Stud 7(3/4):216–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau KW, Lee PY (2015) The use of virtual reality for creating unusual environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas. Interact Learn Environ 23(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau KW, Kan CW, Lee PY (2017) Doing textiles experiments in game-based virtual reality: a design of the stereoscopic chemical laboratory (SCL) for textiles education. Int J Inf Learn Technol 34(3):242–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence E (1999) Strategic thinking: a discussion paper. Public Service Commission of Canada

  • Lee HY, Cherng RJ, Lin CH (2004) Development of a virtual reality environment simulation in the balance assessment of children. Comput Biol Med 34:719–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J (2001) Development of a new cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. In: proceedings of the third international annual workshop on presence. Delft, The Netherlands, pp 76–82

  • Li H, Daugherty T, Biocca F (2003) The role of virtual experience in consumer learning. J Consumer Psychol 13(4):395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lissitz RW, Green SB (1975) The effect of the number of scale points on reliability: a Monte Carlo approach. J Appl Psychol 60:10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochlan EM (1997) Virtual Reality Simulator (VRS) for training ship handling skills. In: Seidel RJ, Chatelier PR, NATO Defense Research Group (eds) Virtual reality, training’s future?: Perspectives on virtual reality and related emerging technologies. Plenum Press, New York, pp 19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard M, Ditton T (1997) At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(2):1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantovani F (2001) VR learning: potential and challenges for the use of 3D environements in education and training. In: Riva G, Galimberti C (eds) Towards cyberpsychology: mind, cognition and society in the internet age. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 207–225

    Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1976) The technology of foolishness. In: March JG, Olsen JP (eds) ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitetsförlaget, Oslo, pp 69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan SJ, Hwang JS (2002) Measures of perceived interactivity: an exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. J Advertis 31(3):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShane SL, Von Glinow MA (2013) Organizational behavior: emerging knowledge global reality. McGraw-Hill Education, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1994) The rise and fall of strategy planning. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers CG (2018) Coactive vicarious learning: toward a relational theory of vicarious learning in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 43(4):610–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nah FF, Eschenbrenner B, DeWester D (2011) Enhancing brand equity through flow and telepresence: a comparison of 2D and 3D virtual worlds. MIS Quarterly 35(3):731–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Laird TF, Garver AK (2010) The effect of teaching general education courses on deep approaches to learning: How disciplinary context matters. Res High Educ 51:248–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevo S, Nevo D, Carmel E (2011) Unlocking the business potential of virtual worlds. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 52(3):13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Oestreicher-Singer G, Zalmanson L (2013) Content or Community? A digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. MIS Quarterly 37(2):591–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordóñez de Pablos P, Lytras MD (2008) Competencies and human resource management: Implications for organizational competitive advantage. J Knowl Manage 12(6):48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci 11(4):404–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Yates J, Okamur K, Fujimoto M (1995) Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ Sci 6(4):423–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg KM (1992) Virtual reality and education: a look at both sides of the sword. Retrieved May 2, 2002, from http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-93-7/

  • Peppart J, Ward J (2004) Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability. J Strategic Inf Syst 13:167–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prawat RS, Floden R (1994) Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Edu Psychol 21(Winter):37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky M (2005) Computer games and learning: digital game-based learning. In: Raessens J, Goldstein J (eds) Handbook of computer game studies. The MIT Press, London, pp 97–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran N, Mishra R (2018) Toward building HR competencies: a shift from the non-learning toward the learning organization. Int J Healthcare Manage 11(3):233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg MJ (2006) Beyond E-learning: approaches and technologies to enhance organizational knowledge, learning, and performance. Pfeiffer, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutten N, van Joolingen WR, van der Veen JT (2012) The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Comput Educ 58(1):136–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sastry L, Boyd DRS (1998) Virtual Environments for engineering applications. Virtual Reality 3:235–244

  • Salzman MC, Dede C, Loftin RB, Chen J (1999) A model for understanding how virtual reality aids complex conceptual learning. Presence 8:293–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sater M, Steed A (2002) Meeting people virtually: Experiments in shared virtual environments. In: Schoeder R (ed) The social life of avatars: presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. Springer, London, pp 146–171

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders C, Rutkowski AF, van Genuchten M, Vogel D, Orrego JM (2011) Virtual space and place: theory and test. MIS Quarterly 35(4):1079–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrage M (2000) Serious play: how the world’s best companies simulate to innovate. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden SC, Sowa JE (2004) Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: prospects and Problems. J Public Administrat Res Theory 14(3):395–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art & practice of the learning organization. Basic Books, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1998) Sharing knowledge. Executive Excellence, pp 11–12

  • Sherman WR, Craig AB (2003) Understanding virtual reality: interface, application, and design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih CF (1998) Conceptualizing consumer experiences in cyberspace. Eur J Mark 32(7/8):655–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicilia M, Ruiz S, Munuera JL (2005) Effects of interactivity in a website. J Advertis 34(3):31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair NT (2017) Building a learning organization in a public library. J Library Administrat 57(6):683–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St-Amant G, Renard L (2004) Proposition d’un modèle de gestion du développement des capacités organisationnelles. XIIième Conférence de l’Association (AIMS), Vallée de Seine, pp 2–4

  • Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun 42(4):73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh KS, Chang S (2006) User interfaces and consumer perceptions of online stores: the role of telepresence. Behav Inf Technol 25(2):99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh KS, Kim H, Suh EK (2011) What if your avatar looks like you? Dual-congruity perspectives for avatar use. MIS Quarterly 25(3):711–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott D, Williams D (2006) Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything. Portfolio, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomke SH (1998) Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Manage Sci 44(6):743–762

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas A, Sancho M, Vukic I (2019) Measuring motivation from the virtual learning environment in secondary education. J Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2017.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaill PB (2007) F. I. Roethlisberger and the elusive phenomena of organizational behavior. J Manage Edu 31(3):321–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH, Polley DE, Garud R, Venkataraman S (1999) The innovation journe”y. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Velazquez LE, Esquer J, Munguia NE, Moure-Eraso R (2011) Sustainable learning organizations. Learn Organ 18(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N (1994) IT-enabled business transformation: From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp 73–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Ramiller N (2009) Community learning in information technology innovation. MIS Quarterly 33(4):709–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins KE, Kim L (2018) Current status and promising directions for research on the learning organization. Human Resour Develop Quarterly 29(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldy TG (2009) Learning organization and transfer: Strategies for improving performance. Learn Organ 16(1):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham DT (2009) Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk A (1998) Educational psychology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu SX, Zhang X (2013) Impact of wikipedia on market information environment: evidence on management disclosure and investor reaction. MIS Quarterly 37(4):1043–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Venkatesh V (2013) Explaining employee job performance: the role of online and offline workplace communication networks. MIS Quarterly 37(3):695–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kung Wong Lau.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lau, K.W., Lee, P.Y. Using virtual reality for professional training practices: exploring the factors of applying stereoscopic 3D technologies in knowledge transfer. Virtual Reality 25, 985–998 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00504-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00504-7

Keywords

Navigation