Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of translation gains in virtual reality: the limits of space manipulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physically walking in Virtual Reality (VR) creates a truly compelling user experience. Many navigation techniques for VR have been presented in the literature. The room-scale technique allows a natural and intuitive navigation through physically walking in the virtual environment, but it is limited to the available physical space. The dimensions of the virtual space can be extended by applying translation gains, i.e., a mapping of physical movements to virtual ones. Previous works have studied the threshold at which users detect the spatial manipulation. However, little is known about the user experience and usability beyond this threshold. This paper presents a user study with 110 participants that explores the effect of using translation gains beyond the detection threshold on cybersickness and presence. The objective of this paper is to assess whether translations gains higher than the ones used in redirection techniques can be used for walking in a bigger virtual environment than the tracking area without influencing user comfort and experience. Results showed no difference in presence scores and minimal cybersickness symptoms when using no gain and a 1.5 × gain, but started to be of concern with a 2 × gain. This contribution supports the use of translation gains and the development of novel applications that allow the exploration of bigger virtual environments, thus improving presence and user experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Zayer M, MacNeilage P, Folmer E (2018) Virtual locomotion: a survey. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Gr 2:1006

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida A, Rebelo F, Noriega P, Vilar E (2017) Virtual reality self induced cybersickness: an exploratory study. In: International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics. Springer, pp 26–33

  • Arns LL, Cerney MM (2005) The relationship between age and incidence of cybersickness among immersive environment users. In: IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality. IEEE, pp 267–268

  • Azmandian M, Grechkin T, Bolas M, Suma E (2016) The redirected walking toolkit: a unified development platform for exploring large virtual environments. In: 2016 IEEE 2nd workshop on everyday virtual reality (WEVR). IEEE, pp 9–14

  • Aïm F, Lonjon G, Hannouche D, Nizard R (2016) Effectiveness of virtual reality training in orthopaedic surgery. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Related Surg 32(1):224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa L, Monteiro P, Pinto M, Coelho H, Melo M, Bessa M (2017) Multisensory virtual environment for firefighter training simulation: study of the impact of haptic feedback on task execution. In: 2017 24° Encontro Português de Computação Gráfica e Interação (EPCGI). IEEE, pp 1–7

  • Bouchard S, St-Jacques J, Robillard G, Renaud P (2008) Anxiety increases the feeling of presence in virtual reality. Presence Teleoper Virtual 17(4):376–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard S, Robillard G, St-Jacques J, Dumoulin S, Patry MJ, Renaud P (2004) Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of presence in VR. In: Proceedings. Second international conference on creating, connecting and collaborating through computing. ieeexplore.ieee.org, pp 59–61

  • Bouguila L, Sato M (2002) Virtual locomotion system for large-scale virtual environment. In: Proceedings IEEE virtual reality 2002. IEEE, pp 291–292

  • Bozgeyikli E, Raij A, Katkoori S, Dubey R (2016) Point & teleport locomotion technique for virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, pp 205–216

  • Bruder G, Interrante V, Phillips L, Steinicke F (2012) Redirecting walking and driving for natural navigation in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Gr 18(4):538–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheok AD, Haller M, Fernando ONN, Wijesena JP (2009) Mixed reality entertainment and art. Int J Virtual Reality 8(2):83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes CAT, Chen H-T, Lin C-T (2019) Analysis of vr sickness and gait parameters during non-isometric virtual walking with large translational gain. In: The 17th international conference on virtual-reality continuum and its applications in industry, pp 1–10

  • Ferracani A, Pezzatini D, Bianchini J, Biscini G, Del Bimbo A (2016) Locomotion by natural gestures for immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on multimedia alternate realities. ACM, pp 21–24

  • Freina L, Ott M (2015) A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In: The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, vol. 1. “Carol I” National Defence University, p 133

  • Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen V, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2):146–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromer D, Madeira O, Gast P, Nehfischer M, Jost M, Müller M, Mühlberger A, Pauli P (2018) Height simulation in a virtual reality cave system: validity of fear responses and effects of an immersion manipulation. Front Hum Neurosci 12:372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interrante V, Ries B, Anderson L (2007) Seven league boots: a new metaphor for augmented locomotion through moderately large scale immersive virtual environments. In: 2007 IEEE symposium on 3D user interfaces. IEEE

  • Ishak S, Bubka A, Bonato F (2018) Visual occlusion decreases motion sickness in a flight simulator. Perception 47(5):521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata H, Yano HM, Tomioka H (2006) powered shoes. In: International conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques ACM SIGGRAPH

  • Kaur K (1997) Designing virtual environments for usability. In: Human-computer interaction INTERACT’97. Springer, pp 636–639

  • Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG (1993) Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 3(3):203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse L, Langbehn E, Stelnlcke F (2018) I can see on my feet while walking: Sensitivity to translation gains with visible feet. In: 2018 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR). IEEE, pp 305–312

  • LaViola JJ Jr, Kruijff E, McMahan RP, Bowman D, Poupyrev IP (2017) 3D user interfaces: theory and practice. Addison-Wesley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Laarni J, Ravaja N, Saari T, Böcking S, Hartmann T, Schramm H (2015) Ways to measure spatial presence: Review and future directions. In: Immersed in media. Springer, Cham, pp 139–185

  • Langbehn E, Eichler T, Ghose S, von Luck K, Bruder G, Steinicke F (2015) Evaluation of an omnidirectional walking-in-place user interface with virtual locomotion speed scaled by forward leaning angle, pp 149–160

  • Langbehn E, Lubos P, Steinicke F (2018) Redirected spaces: going beyond borders. In: 2018 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR). IEEE, pp 767–768

  • Lombard M, Ditton T (1997) At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J Comput Mediated Commun 3(2):321

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor J, Raya L, Sanchez A (2019) A comparative study of virtual reality methods of interaction and locomotion based on presence, cybersickness and usability. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput 2:150

    Google Scholar 

  • Messinis I, Saltaouras D, Pintelas P, Mikropoulos T (2010) Investigation of the relation between interaction and sense of presence in educational virtual environments. In: 2010 international conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning. IEEE, pp 428–431

  • Monahan T, McArdle G, Bertolotto M (2008) Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Comput Educ 50(4):1339–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson NC, Serafin S, Nordahl R (2016) Walking in place through virtual worlds. In: International conference on human-computer interaction, Springer, pp 37–48

  • Oberdörfer S, Fischbach M, Latoschik ME (2018) Effects of ve transition techniques on presence, illusion of virtual body ownership, efficiency, and naturalness. In: Proceedings of the symposium on spatial user interaction. ACM, pp 89–99

  • Oculus (2021) Oculusrift https://www.oculus.com/rift/

  • Razzaque S, Kohn Z, Whitton MC (2005) Redirected walking. Citeseer

  • Reason JT, Brand JJ (1975) Motion sickness. Academic press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Riva G, Davide F, W. A. (2003) IJsselsteijn, Being there: Concepts, effects and measurements of user presence in synthetic environments. Ios Press

  • Ruddle RA, Lessels S (2009) The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 16(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle RA, Péruch P (2004) Effects of proprioceptive feedback and environmental characteristics on spatial learning in virtual environments. Int J Hum Comput Stud 60(3):299–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuemie M, Abel B, van der Mast C, Krijn M, Emmelkamp P (2005) The effect of locomotion technique on presence, fear and usability in a virtual environment. In: EUROMEDIA, vol 2005. Citeseer, p 11th

  • Schwaiger M, Thümmel T, Ulbrich H (2007) Cyberwalk: implementation of a ball bearing platform for humans. In: International conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, pp 926–935

  • Selzer MN, Ganuza ML, Castro SM (2021) High visual-quality scenes in low-cost virtual reality with collisions and irregular surfaces. IEEE Comput Gr Appl 5:769

    Google Scholar 

  • Selzer MN, Gazcon NF, Larrea ML (2019) Effects of virtual presence and learning outcome using low-end virtual reality systems. Displays 59:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarbez R, Brooks FP Jr, Whitton MC (2018) A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 50(6):96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater M (2003) A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3(3):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater M (2004) How colorful was your day? why questionnaires cannot assess presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 13(4):484–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater M (2009) Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364(1535):3549–3557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanney KM, Kennedy RS, Drexler JM (1997) Cybersickness is not simulator sickness. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 41, no 2. SAGE Publications Sage, Los Angeles, CA, pp 1138–1142

  • Steinicke F, Bruder G, Jerald J, Frenz H, Lappe M (2010) Estimation of detection thresholds for redirected walking techniques. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Gr 16(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suma EA, Lipps Z, Finkelstein S, Krum DM, Bolas M (2012) Impossible spaces: maximizing natural walking in virtual environments with self-overlapping architecture. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Gr 18(4):555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suma EA, Bruder G, Steinicke F, Krum DM, Bolas M (2012) A taxonomy for deploying redirection techniques in immersive virtual environments. In: 2012 IEEE virtual reality workshops (VRW). IEEE, pp 43–46

  • Suma EA, Clark S, Finkelstein SL, Wartell Z (2010) Exploiting change blindness to expand walkable space in a virtual environment. In: 2010 IEEE virtual reality conference (VR). IEEE, pp 305–306

  • Tyrrell R, Sarig-Bahat H, Williams K, Williams G, Treleaven J (2018) Simulator sickness in patients with neck pain and vestibular pathology during virtual reality tasks. Virtual Reality 22(3):211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unity, Unity 3D (2021) https://unity.com

  • Unity, Vrtk (2021) https://vrtoolkit.readme.io/

  • Usoh M, Arthur K, Whitton MC, Bastos R, Steed A, Slater M, Brooks Jr FP(1999) Walking> walking-in-place> flying, in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pp 359–364

  • Vasylevska K, Kaufmann H, Bolas M, Suma EA (2013) Flexible spaces: dynamic layout generation for infinite walking in virtual environments. In: 2013 IEEE symposium on 3D user interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, pp 39–42

  • Weech S, Kenny S, Barnett-Cowan M (2019) Presence and cybersickness in virtual reality are negatively related: a review. Front Psychol 10:158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson G, McGill M, Jamieson M, Williamson JR, Brewster SA (2018) Object manipulation in virtual reality under increasing levels of translational gain. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, p 99

  • Witmer BG, Jerome CJ, Singer MJ (2005) The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 14(3):298–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zyda M (2005) From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38(9):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. VyGLab Research Laboratory (UNS-CICPBA), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute for Computer Science and Engineering (UNS–CONICET), Universidad Nacional del Sur, Blanca, Bahía, Argentina

    Matias Nicolas Selzer, Martin Leonardo Larrea & Silvia Mabel Castro

Authors
  1. Matias Nicolas Selzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Leonardo Larrea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Silvia Mabel Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matias Nicolas Selzer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selzer, M.N., Larrea, M.L. & Castro, S.M. Analysis of translation gains in virtual reality: the limits of space manipulation. Virtual Reality 26, 1459–1469 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00640-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00640-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation