Skip to main content
Log in

Subdifferential representations of risk measures

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measures of risk appear in two categories: Risk capital measures serve to determine the necessary amount of risk capital in order to avoid ruin if the outcomes of an economic activity are uncertain and their negative values may be interpreted as acceptability measures (safety measures). Pure risk measures (risk deviation measures) are natural generalizations of the standard deviation. While pure risk measures are typically convex, acceptability measures are typically concave. In both cases, the convexity (concavity) implies under mild conditions the existence of subgradients (supergradients). The present paper investigates the relation between the subgradient (supergradient) representation and the properties of the corresponding risk measures. In particular, we show how monotonicity properties are reflected by the subgradient representation. Once the subgradient (supergradient) representation has been established, it is extremely easy to derive these monotonicity properties. We give a list of Examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance 9, 203–228 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Basset, G., Koenker, R., Kordas, G.: Pessimistic portfolio allocation and Choquet expected utility. Journal of Financial Economics 2, 477–492 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonnans, F., Shapiro, A.: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems. Springer Verlag, New York, 2000

  4. De Giorgi, E.: Reward-risk portfolio selection and stochastic dominance. Journal of Banking & Finance 29 (4), 895–926 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Delbaen, F.: Coherent measures of risk on general probability spaces. In: K. Sandmann, P. Schönbucher (eds.), Advances in Finance and Stochastics. Essays in Honour of Dieter Sondermann. Springer Verlag, New York, 2002, pp. 1–38

  6. Denneberg, D.: Distorted probabilities and insurance premiums. In: Proceedings of the 14th SOR, Ulm. Athenäum, Frankfurt, 1989

  7. Föllmer, H., Schied, A.: Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Stochastics and Finance 6, 429–447 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Föllmer, H., Schied, A.: Robust preferences and convex measures of risk. In: K. Sandmann, P. Schönbucher (eds.), Advances in Finance and Stochastics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2002, pp. 39–56

  9. Frittelli, M., Rosazza Gianin, E.: Dynamic convex risk measures. In: G. Szegö (ed.), Risk measures for the 21st century, chap. 12. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 2004, pp. 227–248

  10. Hewitt, E., Stromberg, K.: Real and Abstract Analysis. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1969

  11. Jaschke, S., Küchler, U.: Coherent risk measures, valuation bounds, and (μ; σ)- portfolio optimization. Finance and Stochastics 5, 181–200 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kusuoka, S.: On law invariant risk measures. Advances In Mathematical Economics 3, 83–95 (2001)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehmann, E.: Some concepts of dependence. Ann. Math. Stat. 37, 1137–1153 (1966)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Neveu, J.: Discrete Parameter Martingals. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1975

  15. Ogryczak, W., Ruszczynski, A.: Dual stochastic dominance and related mean risk models. SIAM Journal on Optimization 13, 60–78 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Rockafellar, R., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk 2, 21–41 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rockafellar, R., Uryasev, S., Zabarankin, M.: Deviation measures in risk analysis. Tech. rep., ISE Dept.,Univerity of Florida (2002). Research report, http://www.ise.ufl.edu/uryasev

  18. Rockafellar, R., Uryasev, S., Zabarankin, M.: Generalized deviations in risk analysis. Tech. rep., ISE Dept.,Univerity of Florida (2004). Research report, http://www.ise.ufl.edu/uryasev

  19. Ruszczynski, A., Shapiro, A.: Optimization of convex risk functions. In: G. Calafiore, F. Dabbene (eds.), Probabilistic and Randomized Methods for Design Under Uncertainty. Springer Verlag, 2006

  20. Strassen, V.: The existence of probability measures with given marginals. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 36, 423–439 (1965)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Ch. Pflug.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pflug, G. Subdifferential representations of risk measures. Math. Program. 108, 339–354 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-006-0714-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-006-0714-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation