Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling population density across major US cities: a polycentric spatial regression approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common approach to modeling population density gradients across a city is to adjust the specification of a selected set of mathematical functions to achieve the best fit to an urban place’s empirical density values. In this paper, we employ a spatial regression approach that takes into account the spatial autocorrelation latent in urban population density. We also use a Minkowskian distance metric instead of Euclidean or network distance to better describe spatial separation. We apply our formulation to the 20 largest metropolitan areas in the US according to the 2000 census, using block group level data. The general model furnishes good descriptions for both monocentric and polycentric cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Alperovich G (1983) Determinants of urban population density functions: a procedure for efficient estimates. Reg Sci Urban Econ 13:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alperovich G, Deutsch J (1992) Population density gradients and urbanisation measurement. Urban Stud 29(8):1323–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alperovich G, Deutsch J (1994) Joint estimation of population density functions and the location of the central business district. J Urban Econ 36:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Can A (1986) Model comparison and model validation issues in empirical work on urban density functions. Geogr Anal 18:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asabere PK, Owusu-Banahene K (1983) Population density function for Ghanaian (African) cities: an empirical note. J Urban Econ 14(3):370–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M, Kwang SK (1992) Form follows function: reformulating urban population density functions. Urban Stud 29(7):1043–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumont C, Ertur C, Le Gallo J (2004) Spatial analysis of employment and population density: the case of the agglomeration of Dijon 1999. Geogr Anal 36:146–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussière R, Snickars F (1970) Derivation of the negative exponential model by an entropy maximizing method. Environ Plann A 2:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron A, Windmeijer F (1996) R-Squared measures for count data regression models with applications to health care utilization. J Bus Econ Stat 14:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron A, Windmeijer F (1997) An R-Squared measure of goodness-of-fit for some common nonlinear-regression models. J Economet 77:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H-P (1997) Models of urban population and employment density: the spatial structure of monocentric and polycentric functions in greater taipei and a comparison to Los Angeles. Geogr Environ Modell 1:135–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark C (1951) Urban population densities. J R Stat Soc Ser A 114:490–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton GR (1991) Residential density patterns in London—any role left fro the exponential density gradient? Environ Plann A 23:1007–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonston B, Goldberg MA, Mercer J (1985) Urban form in Canada and the United States: an examination of urban density gradients. Urban Stud 22:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feser E, Sweeney S, Renski H (2005) A descriptive analysis of discrete U.S. industrial complexes. J Reg Sci 45(2):395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca JW, Wong DWS (2000) Changing patterns of population density in the United States. Prof Geogr 52(3):504–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24:189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Anselin L, Lea A, Ferguson M, Miller H (2005) Spatial analysis and modeling in a GIS environment. In: McMaster R, Usery E (eds) A research agenda for geographic information science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 175–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P, Richardson H, Wong HL (1986) The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: the case of Los Angeles. Environ Plann A 18:161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D (1981a) Modelling urban population density in a multi-centered city. J Urban Econ 9:298–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D (1981b) Evaluating the transformation from a monocentric to a polycentric city. Prof Geog 33:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D (1999) Statistical and mathematical sources of regional science theory: map pattern analysis as an example. Pap Reg Sci 78:21–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D (2004) Extreme eigenfunctions of adjacency matrices for planar graphs employed in spatial analyses. Linear Algebr Appl 204:201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D, Can A (1995) Spatial statistical/econometric versions of simple urban population density models. In: Arlinghaus SL (ed) Practical handbook of spatial statistics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 231–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D, Wong DWS, Whitfield T (2003) Exploring relationships between the global and regional measures of spatial autocorrelation. J Reg Sci 43(4):683–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han S (2005) Polycentric urban development and spatial clustering of condominium property values: Singapore in the 1990s. Environ Plann A 37:463–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila E, Gordon P, Kim JI, Peiser RB, Richardson HW, Dale-Johnson D (1989) What happened to the CBD-distance gradient? Land values in a policentric city. Environ Plann A 21:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill F (1973) Spatio-temporal trends in urban population density: a trend surface analysis. In: Bourne L, MacKinnon R, Simmons J (eds) The form of cities in central Canada. University of Toronto Press, ON, pp 103–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch I, Waddell P (1993) Apartment rents: another challenge to the monocentric model. Geogr Anal 25(1):20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer H (1991) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: what has the evidence shown? Urban Stud 28:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner MW (2002) Extensions to the concept of excess commuting. Environ Plann A 34(3):543–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston D (2005) Methods to test the spatial mismatch hypothesis. Econ Geogr 81(4):407–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martori J, Suriñach J (2002) Urban population density functions: the case of the Barcelona region. Documents de Recerca, Universitat de Vic, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen DP (2003) Identifying sub-centers using contiguity matrices. Urban Stud 40(1):57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillen DP (2004) Employment densities, spatial autocorrelation, and subcenters in large metropolitan areas. J Reg Sci 44(2):225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills ES (1970) Urban density functions. Urban Stud 7:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills ES, Tan JP (1980) A comparison of urban population density functions in developed and developing countries. Urban Stud 17:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittlböck M, Schemper M (1999) Computing measures of explained variation for logistic regression models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 58:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muth R (1969) Cities and housing: the spatial pattern of urban residential land use. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Paez A, Uchida T, Miyamoto K (2001) Spatial association and heterogeneity issues in land price models. Urban Stud 38(9):1493–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston V, McLafferty S (1999) Spatial mismatch research in the 1990s: progress and potential. Pap Reg Sci 78:387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small K, Song S (1992) Wasteful commuting: a resolution. J Polit Econ 100:888–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston L, Yezer A (1991) Testing the monocentric urban model: evidence based on wasteful commuting. AREUEA J 19:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X-P (1991) Metropolitan spatial structure and its determinants: a case-study of Tokyo. Urban Stud 28(1):87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zielinski K (1979) Experimental analysis of eleven models of urban population density. Environ Plann A 11:629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel A. Griffith.

Additional information

D. A. Griffith is Ashbel Smith Professor at the School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffith, D.A., Wong, D.W. Modeling population density across major US cities: a polycentric spatial regression approach. J Geograph Syst 9, 53–75 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-006-0032-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-006-0032-y

Keywords

Navigation