Abstract
Census data has been widely used for community evaluation based on demographic and socioeconomic variables. However, the analysis is typically associated with specific areal units and the results often change when the size of the census configuration changes leading to scale distortions. Various approaches such as optimal zoning systems and multivariate statistical analysis have been developed to address the scale problem. But limitations in these approaches have led to the use of non-statistical methods to tackle the scale problem. This study combines a non-statistical method with descriptive statistical measures to develop a rough sets approach to constructing a census-based deprivation index (DI) and to determine its relationship to a recent immigrant population using the 2001 Canadian census. Application of the approach in the Greater Vancouver Regional District shows that rough sets can stabilize relationships for spatially grouped census data by minimizing scale distortions. Scale sensitivity measures are also estimated to translate DI relationships across three census configurations. The rough sets approach is suitable for areal data analysis because it is resistant to nonlinearity, outliers, and assumes no prior relationship between variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
census configuration represents an areal unit at which census data are reported, and has been used to represent a census scale.
a census unit is used to represent any census configuration (e.g., CSD, CT or DA).
References
Barber GM (1998) Elementary statistics for geographers. Guilford, New York
Cliff AD, Haggett P (1979) Geographical aspects of epidemic diffusion in closed communities. In: Wrigley N (ed) Spatial applications in the spatial sciences. Pion Ltd, Brondesbury Park
Evans IS (1979) Relationships between Great Britain census variables at the 1 km aggregate level. In: Wrigley N (ed) Statistical applications in the spatial sciences. Pion Ltd, Brondesbury Park
Evans IS (1981) Census data handling. In: Wrigley N, Bennett RJ (eds) Quantitative geography: a British view. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Fotheringham AS (1989) Scale-independent spatial analysis. In: Goodchild MF, Gopal S (eds) The accuracy of spatial databases. Taylor & Francis, London
Fotheringham AS, Wong DWS (1991) The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environ Plan A 23:1025–1044
Greater Vancouver Regional District (2003) 2001 Census Bulletin #6—Immigration, edited by P. a. Planning: Greater Vancouver Regional District
Green M, Flowerdew R (1996) New evidence on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Longley P, Batty M (eds) Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. Pearson Professional Ltd, New York
Hepple LW (1979) Regional dynamics in British unemployment, and the impact of structural change. In: Wrigley N (ed) Statistical applications in the spatial sciences. Pion Ltd, Brondesbury Park
Jelinski DE, Wu J (1996) The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 11(3):129–140
Kazemipur A, Halli SS (1997) Plight of immigrants: the spatial concentration of poverty in Canada. Can J Reg Sci 20(1,2):11–28
Lay D, Smith H (1997) Immigration and poverty in Canadian Cities, 1971–1991. Can J Reg Sci 20(1,2):29–48
Manley D, Flowerdew R, Steel D (2006) Scales, levels and processes: studying spatial patterns of British census variables. Comput Environ Urban Syst 30(2):143–160
Marceau JD (1999) The scale issue in social and natural sciences. Can J Remote Sens 25(4):347–356
McCulloch A (2001) Ward-level deprivation and individual social and economic outcomes in the British Household Panel Study. Environ Plan A 33:667–684
Nakaya T (2000) An information statistical approach to the modifiable areal unit problem in incidence rate maps. Environ Plan A 32(1):91–109
Ohrn A (1999) Discernibility and rough sets in medicine: tools and applications, computer and information science. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Openshaw S (1984a) The modifiable areal unit problem. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography (CATMOG) 38
Openshaw S (1984b) Ecological fallacies and the analysis of areal census data. Environ Plan A 16:17–31
Openshaw S (1996) Developing GIS-relevant zone-based spatial analysis methods. In: Longley P, Batty M (eds) Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. Pearson Professional Ltd, New York
Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1979) A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Wrigley N (ed) Statistical applications in the spatial sciences. Pion Ltd, London
Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1981) The modifiable areal unit problem. In: Wrigley N, Bennett RJ (ed) Quantitative geography: a British view. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Paelinck HPJ (2000) On aggregation in spatial econometric modelling. J Geogr Syst 2(2):157–165
Pampalon R, Raymond G (2000) A deprivation index for health and welfare planning in Quebec. Chronic Dis Can 21(3):104–113
Pawitan G, Steel D (2006) Exploring a relationship between aggregate and individual levels spatial data through semivariogram models. Geogr Anal 38(2):310–325
Pawlak Z (1997) Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support. Eur J Oper Res 99:48–57
Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11:341–356
Pawlak Z, Grzymala-Bausse J, Slowinski R, Ziarko W (1995) Rough sets. Emerg Technol Commun ACM 38(11):89–95
Rafanelli M, Bezenchek TL (1996) The aggregate data problem: a system for their definition and management. SIGMOD Record 25(4):8–13
Reynolds HD (1998) The modifiable area unit problem: empirical analysis by statistcal simulation. Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Toronto
Stafford M, Marmot M (2003) Neighbourhood deprivation and health: does it affect us all equally? Int J Epidemiol 32:357–366
Statistics Canada (2005) 2001 Census of Canada, Statistics Canada
Tagashira N, Okabe A (2002) The modifiable areal unit problem in a regression model whose independent variable is a distance from a predetermined point. Geogr Anal Int J Theor Geogr 34(1):1–20
Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A (1998) Health and deprivation. Croom Helm Ltd, London
Tranmer M, Steel D (1998) Using census data to investigate the causes of the ecological fallacy. Environ Plan A 30(5):817–831
Tranmer, M, Steel D (2001) Using local census data to investigate scale effects. In: Tate NJ, Atkinson PM (eds) Chapter 6: modelling scale in geographical information science. Wiley, Chichester
Wrigley N, Holt T, Steel D, Tranmer M (1996) Analysing, modelling, and resolving the ecological fallacy. In: Longley P, Batty M (eds) Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. Pearson Professional Ltd, New York
Zhang J, Goodchild MF (2002) Uncertainty in geographical information. Taylor & Francis, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dumedah, G., Schuurman, N. & Yang, W. Minimizing effects of scale distortion for spatially grouped census data using rough sets. J Geograph Syst 10, 47–69 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-007-0056-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-007-0056-y