Abstract
Lithologies for water wells in Canada constitute a major data source for describing the subsurface geology. Generally the datasets contain inconsistent descriptions and consequently have limited utility for deriving relevant geological information. The Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) has developed a standardization scheme to address the problem but the scheme does not thoroughly resolve the data inaccuracy problem. This study applies rough sets and transition probability to evaluate the GSC scheme using a protocol based on high quality borehole data. Our results demonstrate that misclassifications exist in the description of fine geologic materials, particularly, clay and silt. The results based on transition probability show that the data inaccuracy problem persists even when borehole data are standardized using the GSC scheme. The study provides information for the borehole data that is equivalent to metadata for users to quantify the level of uncertainty associated with inconsistent sediment description in the borehole data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Lithology describes the physical properties of rocks based on color, mineralogy, composition and grain size.
Stratigraphy describes the spatial ordering or the vertical sequence of geological rock layers.
Diamicton is unsorted and unstratified rock debris composed of a wide range of particle sizes.
References
Barnett PJ, Sharp DR, Russell HAJ, Brennand TA, Gorrell G, Kenny F et al (1998) On the origin of the Oak Ridges Moraine. Can J Earth Sci 35:1152–1167. doi:10.1139/cjes-35-10-1152
Carle SF (1999) T-PROGS: transition probability geostatistical software version 2.1: Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group University of California, Davis
Carle SF, Fogg GE (1997) Modelling spatial variability with one and multidimensional continuous-lag Markov chains. Math Geol 29(7):891–918. doi:10.1023/A:1022303706942
Chapman LJ, Putman DF (1984) The physiography of Southern Ontario, special vol 2. Ontario Research Foundation, University of Toronto Press, Toronto
City of Toronto (2005) Oak Ridges Moraine. http://www.toronto.ca/moraine/index.htm. Accessed on 20 June 2006
Dumedah G, Schuurman N, Yang W (2008) Minimizing effects of scale distortion for spatially grouped census data using rough sets. J Geogr Syst 10(1):47–69. doi:10.1007/s10109-007-0056-y
Elfeki A, Dekking M (2001) A Markov chain model for subsurface characterization: theory and applications. Math Geol 33(5):569–589. doi:10.1023/A:1011044812133
Guerin R (2005) Borehole and surface-based hydrogeophysics. Hydrogeol J 13(1):251–254. doi:10.1007/s10040-004-0415-4
Howard RA (1971) Markov models, vol 1. In: Dynamic probabilistic systems. Wiley, New York
Hsieh B-Z, Lewis C, Lin Z-S (2005) Lithology identification of aquifers from geophysical well logs and fuzzy logic analysis: Shui-Lin Area, Taiwan. Comput Geosci 31:263–275. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2004.07.004
Jones NL (2003) Seepage and groundwater modeling. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University. http://class.et.byu.edu/ce547/. Accessed on 10 August 2004
Ohrn A (1999) Discernibility and rough sets in medicine: tools and applications, computer and information science. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11:341–356. doi:10.1007/BF01001956
Pawlak Z (1997) Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support. Eur J Oper Res 99:48–57. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00382-7
Pawlak Z, Grzymala-Bausse J, Slowinski R, Ziarko W (1995) Rough Sets. Emerging technologies. Commun ACM 38(11):89–95. doi:10.1145/219717.219791
Price M (1985) Introducing groundwater. George Allen & Unwin, London
Russell HAJ, Logan C, Brennand TA, Hinton MJ, Sharp DR (1996) Regional geoscience database for the Oak Ridges Moraine project (southern Ontario). In: Current Research 1996-E; Geological Survey of Canada, pp 191–200
Russell HAJ, Brennand TA, Logan C, Sharp DR (1998) Standardization and assessment of geological descriptions from water well records: greater Toronto and Oak Ridges Moraine areas, southern Ontario. In: Current Research; Geological Survey of Canada, pp 89–102
Schuurman N (2002) Flexible standardisation: making interoperability accessible to agencies with limited resources. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 29(4):343–353. doi:10.1559/152304002782008350
Sharp DR, Dyke LD, Hinton SE, Russell HAJ, Brennand TA, Barnett PJ et al (1996a) Groundwater prospects in the Oak Ridges Moraine area, southern Ontario: application of regional geological models. In: Current Research 1996-E; Geological Survey of Canada, pp 181–190
Sharp DR, Dyke LD, Hinton SE, Russell HAJ, Brennand TA, Barnett PJ, Pugin A (1996b) Groundwater prospects in the Oak Ridges Moraine area, southern Ontario: application of regional geological models. In: Current Research; Geological Survey of Canada, pp 181–190
Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46:234–240. doi:10.2307/143141
Tolman CF (1937) Ground water. McGraw-Hill, New York
Tood DK (1964) Ground water hydrology. Wiley, New York
Zhang J, Goodchild MF (2002) Uncertainty in geographical information. Taylor & Francis, New York
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Terrain Sciences Division of the Geological Survey of Canada for providing the borehole data for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dumedah, G., Schuurman, N. Minimizing the effects of inaccurate sediment description in borehole data using rough sets and transition probability. J Geograph Syst 10, 291–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-008-0066-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-008-0066-4