Abstract
We present a model that simulates the growth of a metropolitan area on a 2D lattice. The model is dynamic and based on microeconomics. Households show preferences for nearby open spaces and neighbourhood density. They compete on the land market. They travel along a road network to access the CBD. A planner ensures the connectedness and maintenance of the road network. The spatial pattern of houses, green spaces and road network self-organises, emerging from agents individualistic decisions. We perform several simulations and vary residential preferences. Our results show morphologies and transition phases that are similar to Dieletric Breakdown Models (DBM). Such similarities were observed earlier by other authors, but we show here that it can be deducted from the functioning of the land market and thus explicitly connected to urban economic theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To our knowledge, however, the literature has not yet clarified whether the shape of the network is mainly an exogenous or an endogenous factor of sprawl.
The dimension drops at γ = 0.39 but the fractal curve adjustment was not robust at that point due to reduced spatial expansion.
References
Anderson ST, West SE (2006) Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Reg Sci Urban Econ 6(6):773–789
Andersson C, Lindgren K, Rasmunssen S, White R (2002) Urban growth simulation from “first principles”. Phys Rev E 66(2):026204
Batty M (1991) Generating urban forms from diffusive growth. Environ Plan A 3(4):511–544
Batty M, Longley P (1986) The fractal simulation of urban structure. Environ Plan A 18(9):1143–1179
Batty M, Longley P (1994) Fractal cities. Academic Press, London, p 394
Benguigui L (1995a) A fractal analysis of the public transportation system of Paris. Environ Plan A 27(7):1147–1161
Benguigui L (1995b) A new aggregation model. Application to town growth. Physica A 219(1):13–26
Benguigui L (1998) Aggregation models for town growth. Philos Mag B 77(55):1269–1275
Benguigui L, Czamanski D, Marinov M (2001) City growth as a leap-frogging process: an application to the Tel-Aviv Metropolis. Urban Stud 38(10):1819–1839
Bogoyavlenskiy VA, Chernova NA (2000) Diffusion-limited aggregation: A relationship between surface thermodynamics and crystal morphology. Phys Rev E 61(2):1629–1633
Caruso G, Peeters D, Cavailhès J, Rounsevell M (2007) Spatial configurations and cellular dynamics in a periurban city. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37(5):542–567
Cavailhès J, Brossard T, Foltête J-C, Hilal M, Joly D, Tourneux F-P, Tritz C, Wavresky P (2006) Seeing and being seen: a gis-based hedonic price valuation of landscape. Working paper of INRA-CESAER, CNRS-ThéMA, Dijon, Besançon (France)
Cavailhès J, Frankhauser P, Peeters D, Thomas I (2004) Where Alonso meets Sierpinski: an urban economic model of fractal metropolitan area. Environ Plan A 36(8):1471–1498
Cheshire P, Sheppard S (1995) On the price of land and the value of amenities. Economica 62(246):247–267
Chikushi J, Hirota O (1998) Simulation of root development based on the dielectric breakdown model. Hydrol Sci 43(4):549–559
Couclelis H, (1985) Cellular worlds: a framework for modelling micro-macro dynamics. Environ Plan A 17(5):585–596
Frankhauser P (1991) Aspects fractals de structures urbaines. Espace géographique 19:45–69
Galster GC, Hanson R, Ratcliffe MR, Wolman H, Coleman S, Freihage J (2001) Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate 12(4):681–717
Irwin EG (2002) The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Econ 78(4):465–480
Li B, Wang J, Wang B, Liu W, Wu Z (1995) Computer simulations of bacterial-colony formation. Europhys Lett 30(4):239–243
Lu Y, Tang J (2004) Fractal dimension of a transportation network and its relationship with urban growth: a study of the Dallas—Fort Worth area. Environ Plan B 31(6):895–911
Makse HA, Andrade JS, Batty M, Havlin S, Stanley HE (1998) Modeling urban growth patterns with correlated percolation. Phys Rev E 58(6):7054–7062
Makse HA, Havlin S, Stanley HE (1995) Modelling urban growth patterns. Nature 377:608–612
Mathiesen J, Jensen MH, Bakke JOH (2008) Dimensions, maximal growth sites, and optimization in the dielectric breakdown model. Phys Rev E 77(6):066203
Niemeyer L, Pietronero L, Wiesmann HJ (1984) Fractal dimension of dielectric breakdown. Phys Rev Lett 52(12):1033–1036
Peruani F, Solovey G, Irurzuni IM, Mola EE, Marzocca A, Vicente JL (2003) Dielectric breakdown model for composite materials. Phys Rev E 67(6):066121
Phipps M (1989) Dynamical behavior of cellular automata under the constraint of neighborhood coherence. Geogr Anal 21(3):197–216
Pietronero L, Wissman HJ (1984) Stochastic model for dielectric breakdown. J Stat Phys 36(5,6):909–916
Sanchez A, Guinea F, Sander LM, Hakim V, Louis E (1993) Growth and forms of Laplacian aggregates. Phys Rev E 48(2):1296–1304
Schelling TC (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. J Math Sociol 1(2):143–186
van Vliet J, White R, Dragicevic S (2009) Modeling urban growth using a variable grid cellular automaton. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33(1):35–43
White R, Engelen G (1993) Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns. Environ Plan A 25(8):1175–1199
White R, Engelen G (1994) Cellular dynamics and GIS: modelling spatial complexity. Geogr Syst 1(2):237–253
Witten TA, Sander LM (1981) Diffusion-limited aggregation, a kinetic critical phenomenon. Phys Rev Lett 47(19):1400–1403
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caruso, G., Vuidel, G., Cavailhès, J. et al. Morphological similarities between DBM and a microeconomic model of sprawl. J Geogr Syst 13, 31–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-010-0131-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-010-0131-7