Skip to main content
Log in

Analysing situated interaction hazards: an activity-based awareness approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a case for the usefulness of activity theory (AT) for the analysis of situated interaction hazards in safety-related systems. It is suggested here that situation awareness is a safety critical attribute that is acquired and maintained through situated activity or actions. We introduce an activity-based awareness model based on this fundamental premise and we show how the model is consistent with the principles of AT. We also provide an example of the usefulness of AT as a theoretical and practical foundation for the analysis of situated interaction hazards in complex, safety-related systems. Specifically, we describe how the activity-based awareness model and AT principles were applied to an investigation of situation awareness in a military air traffic control system. We show how this approach can also be used to support analyses of general interactive systems use. We suggest that this general approach can be used to support analyses of interactive system use, to inform system design, and mitigate against the situated interaction hazards inherent in safety-related systems, and that this provides evidence that AT can be a useful way of looking at situational hazards in safety-related systems use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artman H, Waern Y (1995) Theoretical perspectives on and pragmatic concerns for situated action in relation to information technology. In: Waern Y (ed) Cognitive science and information technology: prerequisites and consequences of the use of information technology, Brytpunkt, HSFR, pp 73–88

  • Artman H, Waern Y (1996) Creation and loss of cognitive empathy at an emergency control centre. In: Green TRG, Canas JJ and Warren CO (eds) Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Cognition and the Worksystem, Le Chesnay Cedex, EACE

  • Artman H, Waern Y (1999) Distributed cognition in an emergency coordination centre. Cog Technol Work 1:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannon LJ, Bodker S (1991) Beyond the interface: encountering artefacts in use. In: Carroll J (ed) Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface, Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Blackler F (1993) Knowledge and the theory of organisations: organisations as activity systems and the reframing of management. J Manage Stud 30:863–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodker S (1991) Through the interface: a human activity approach to user interface design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodker S (1996) Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in HCI. In: Nardi BA (ed) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, MIT Press, London

  • Card SK, Moran TP and Pew R (1983) The psychology of human computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

  • Endsley MR (1995) Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factor 37:32–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom Y (1987) Learning by expanding. Orienta-konsultit, Helsinki

  • Garbis C, Waern Y (1999) Team coordination and communication in a rescue command staff: the role of public representations. La Travail Humain 62:273–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan H (1998) Integrating IS and HCI using activity theory as a philosophical and theoretical basis. Foundations of Information Systems. http://www.cba.uh.edu/~parks/fis/hasan.htm. Cited 4 November 1998

  • Heath CC, Luff PK (1991) Collaborative activity and technological design: task coordination in London Underground control rooms. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work, Amsterdam

  • Hollnagel E (1993) Human reliability analysis: context and control. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Bradford, UK

  • Kaptelinin V (1996) Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction. In: Nardi BA (ed) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, MIT Press, London

  • Klein M (1991) Supporting conflict resolution in cooperative design systems. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cybern 21(6): 1379–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuutti K (1996) Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Nardi BA (ed) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, MIT Press, London

  • Leontiev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  • Leontiev AN (1981) The problem of activity in psychology. In: Wertsch JV (ed) The concept of activity in soviet psychology, Sharpe, Armonk, NY

  • Luff PK, Heath CC (2000) The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. Int J Hum-Comp Stud 52:669–699

  • Nardi BA (ed) (1996a) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press, London

  • Nardi BA (1996b) Concepts of cognition and consciousness: four voices. Austral J Info Sys 4:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U (1976) Cognition and reality: principles and implications of cognitive psychology. WH Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin GI (1997) Trapped in the net: the unforseen consequences of computerization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandom C (1999) Situational awareness through the interface: Evaluating safety in safety-critical control systems. In: Proceedings of People in Control—An International Conference on Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, University of Bath, UK, 21 – 23 June, 1999

  • Sandom C (2002) Situation awareness. In: Noyes J, Bransby M (eds) People in control: human factors in control room design, IEE Publishing, London, pp 51–68

  • Sarter NB, Woods DD (1991) Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon. Int J Aviat Psychol 1:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Storrs G (1997) Introduction to HCI in safety-critical systems. In: Redmill F, Rajan J (eds) Human factors in safety-critical systems, Butterworth-Heinemann, London

  • Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Vygotsky L (1978) Mind in society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Whalen J (1995) Technology and the coordination of human activity: computer-aided dispatch in public safety communications. In: Ten Have P, Psathas G (eds) Situated order: studies in the social organisation of talk, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, pp 187–230

  • Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Ablex, Norwood, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Sandom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandom, C., Macredie, R.D. Analysing situated interaction hazards: an activity-based awareness approach. Cogn Tech Work 5, 218–228 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-003-0130-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-003-0130-2

Keywords

Navigation