Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characteristics and organizational constraints of collaborative planning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inter-departmental co-ordination is considered an important factor for the success of a company. Individuals predominantly plan according to the goals of their own department. In cooperative relationships, however, they also try to create possibilities for the optimization of the planning for the other individual. This paper analyzes the influence of organizational structures on inter-departmental collaborative demand planning. Psychological planning theories were applied to deduce typical collaborative planning requirements. This permitted an evaluation of the quality of inter-departmental planning processes. The following characteristics were identified: communication of anticipated events, knowledge of reference field characteristics, goal agreements, negotiation of alternatives, recognition of planning adequacy, monitoring and error diagnosis, co-ordination of opportunistic planning and finally common reflection and decision process for plan cancellation. For a field study three companies with different demand planning structures were selected. Using the critical incident technique, individuals were asked to describe events in which helping or hindering activities in the intra- and interdepartmental context occurred. These events were analyzed with respect to the derived characteristics of collaborative planning. The results indicated the usefulness of the chosen characteristics for describing crucial aspects of (un)successful collaborative planning. There was tentative evidence also that team-oriented structures including representatives of various departments are more suitable for the management of a high amount of planning uncertainty than department-oriented structures. Furthermore, relationships between organizational design, quality of collaborative planning, logistical performance and satisfaction with inter-departmental communication could be demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Callister RR, Wall JA (2001) Conflict across organizational boundaries: managed care organizations versus health care providers. J Appl Psychol 86:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranach Mv, Tschan F (1990) Mehrstufigkeit im zielgerichteten Verhalten von Organisationen. In: Frei F, et al. (eds) Das Bild der Arbeit. Huber, Bern, pp 208–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranach Mv, Tschan F (2001) Psychology of action planning. In: Smelser NJ (ed) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford S, Mac Carthy BL, Wilson J, Vernon C (1999) Investigating the work of industrial scheduler through field study. Cogn Technol Work 1:63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das JP, Kar BC, Parrila RK (1996) Cognitive planning. The psychological basis of intelligent behaviour. Sage Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellinger A (2000) Improving marketing/logistics cross-functional collaboration in the supply chain. Ind Market Manage 29:85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51:327–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funke J, Glodowski AS (1990) Planen und Problemlösen: Überlegungen zur neuropsychologischen Diagnostik von Basiskompetenzen beim Planen. Z Neuropsychol 2:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces 4:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote G (1997) Autonomie und Kontrolle. Zur Gestaltung automatisierter und risikoreicher Systeme. vdf Hochschulverlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote G (2002) Planen in Organisationen: Forschungserfordernisse und -ansätze. In: Silbereisen RK, et al. (eds) Psychologie 2000—Bericht über den 42. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Jena 2000. Pabst Science, Lengerich, pp 576–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote G (2004) Uncertainty management at the core of system design. Annu Rev Control 28:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote G, Ryser C, Wäfler T, Windischer A, Weik S (2000) KOMPASS: a method for complementary function allocation in automated work systems. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:267–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker W (1998) Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie. Psychische Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker W (2001) Psychological activity theory. In: Smelser NJ (ed) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafen U, Künzler C, Fischer D (1999) Erfolgreich restrukturieren in KMU. Werkzeuge und Beispiele für eine nachhaltige Veränderung. vdf Hochschulverlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagdorn-van der Meijden L, Van Nunen JAEE, Ramondt A (1994) Forecasting—bridging the gap between sales and manufacturing. Int J Prod Econ 37:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield RB, Nichols EL (1999) Introduction to supply chain management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Roth B, Hayes-Roth F (1979) A cognitive model of planning. Cogn Sci 3:275–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad Manage Rev 25:121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn K, Mentzer JTM (1994) The impact of team-based forecasting. J Bus Forecast, Summer issue, pp 18–21

  • Klein GA, Calderwood R, MacGregor D (1989) Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 19:462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleining G (1991) Methodologie und Geschichte qualitativer Sozialforschung. In: Flick U, et al. (eds) Handbuch qualitative Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden und Anwendungen. Psychologie Verlags Union, München, pp 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organizations and environments: managing differentiation and integration. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontjew A (1981) The problem of activity in psychology. In: Wertsch JV (ed) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, pp 37–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring P (2000) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken (7. Auflage). Deutscher Studienverlag, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay KN, Buzacott JA, Safayeni F (1989) The scheduler’s knowledge of uncertainty: the missing link. In: Browne J (ed) Knowledge based production management systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 171–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier Martins S, Cheikhrouhou N, Glardon R (2003) Strategic analysis of products for integrating judgement into demand forecasts. In: Proceedings of the IFIP working conference on human aspects in production management, Karlsruhe, 5–9 October, pp 196–203

  • Nassimbeni G (1998) Network structures and co-ordination mechanisms. A taxonomy. Int J Oper Prod Manage 18:538–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauta A, Sanders K (2001) Causes and consequences of perceived goal differences between departments within manufacturing organizations. J Occup Organ Psychol 74:321–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauta A, De Dreu CKW (2002) Social value orientation, organizational goal concerns and interdepartmental problem-solving behaviour. J Organ Behav 23:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterreich R, Resch MG (1985) Zur Analyse arbeitsbezogener Kommunikation. Z Soz Forsch Erziehungssoziol 2:271–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker SK, Axtell CM (2001) Seeing another view point: antecendents and outcomes of employee perspective taking activity. Acad Manage J 44:1085–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resch M (1988) Die Handlungsregulation geistiger Arbeit. Bestimmung und Analyse geistiger Arbeitstätigkeiten in der industriellen Produktion. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff B, Gauvain M, Gardner W (1987) The development of children’s skills in adjusting plans to circumstances. In: Friedman SL, et al. (eds) Blueprints for thinking: the role of planning in cognitive developement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp 303–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff B, Baker-Sennett J, Matusov E (1994) Considering the concept of planning. In: Haith MM, et al. (eds) The development of future-oriented processes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 353–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson PM (1989) The human planning ans scheduling role in advanced manufacturing systems: an emerging human factors domain. Hum Factors 31:635–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholnick EK, Friedman SL (1987) The planning construct in the psychological literature. In: Friedman SL, et al. (eds) Blueprints for thinking: the role of planning in cognitive development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp 3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüpbach H (1994) Prozessregulation in rechnerunterstützten Fertigungssystemen. In Schriftenreihe Mensch, Technik, Organisation (4). Verlag der Fachvereine, Zuerich

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro BP (1977) Can marketing and manufacturing coexist? Harv Bus Rev 55:104–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperka M (1997) Zur Entwicklung eines “Fragebogens zur Erfassung der Kommunikation in Organisationen”. Z Arbeits Organisationspsychol 41:182–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman LA (1994) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman GI (1976) Autonomy at work. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold D, Dann V, Wong C (1992) Managing conflict between departments to serve customers. Hum Relat 45:1035–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschan F (1995) Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms to task requirements: the concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 17:371–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulich E (1994) Arbeitspsychologie (4. Aufl.). vdf Hochschulverlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • VDI (1999) Praxisorientierte Logistikkennzahlen für kleine und mittelständische Unternehmen. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpert W (1994) Wider die Maschinenmodelle des Handelns. Aufsätze zur Handlungsregulationstheorie. Pabst, Lengerich

    Google Scholar 

  • Wäfler A (2002) Verteilt koordinierte Autonomie und Kontrolle—Eine arbeitspsychologische Konzeptergänzung für die autonomieorientierte Analyse, Bewertung und Gestaltung der Produktionsplanung und -steuerung. Ph.D. Thesis. ETH Zürich

  • Wäfler T, Grote G, Windischer A, Ryser C (2003) KOMPASS: a method for complementary system design. In: Hollnagel E (ed) Handbook of cognitive task design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 477–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner T, Clases C, Endres E (1996) Situiertes Lernen und kooperatives Handeln in Praxisgemeinschaften. In: Endres E, et al. (eds) Zwischenbetriebliche Kooperation die Gestaltung von Lieferbeziehungen. Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim, pp 71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm Sci Q 38:357–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiers VCS (1997) Human–computer interaction in production scheduling: analysis and design of decision support systems for production scheduling tasks. Ph.D. Thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology

  • Windischer A, Grote G (2003) Success factors for collaborative planning. In: Seuring S, et al. (eds) Strategy and organization in supply chains. Physica, Heldelberg, pp 133–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterstein H (1998) Kooperative Kommunikation. In: Spiess E, et al. (eds) Kooperation in Unternehmen. Rainer Hampp Verlag, München, pp 143–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbaum GM, Merry CJ, Stasser G (1996) Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. J Exp Soc Psychol 32:129–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zölch M (2001) Zeitliche Koordination in der Produktion. Aktivitäten der Handlungsverschränkung. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, 8032, Zürich, Switzerland

    Anna Windischer, Gudela Grote & Fabienne Mathier

  2. Laboratory for Production Management and Processes, ETH Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Séverine Meunier Martins & Rémy Glardon

Authors
  1. Anna Windischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gudela Grote
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabienne Mathier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Séverine Meunier Martins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rémy Glardon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gudela Grote.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Windischer, A., Grote, G., Mathier, F. et al. Characteristics and organizational constraints of collaborative planning. Cogn Tech Work 11, 87–101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0083-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0083-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation