Skip to main content
Log in

Opportunities and challenges in improving surgical work flow

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Safe and efficient surgical operations depend on a work environment larger than the individual operating room (OR) and on communications at different levels of the hospital organization. Extensive communication is needed before and during surgery to ensure that surgical rooms, equipment, and supplies; patients; surgeons; supporting personnel; and accompanying documentation are all ready at the appropriate times. In this article, we compile the results of three of our studies of communication activities outside ORs, with the goal of identifying opportunities and challenges in the workflow of surgery. The first study demonstrates the amount of communication work performed by OR coordinators. The second study demonstrates the potential functions of a whiteboard in communication. The third study describes an organizational learning strategy of proactive event reporting. We apply computer-supported cooperative work and organizational learning concepts to the findings and suggest ways in which information technology may improve surgical workflow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OR:

Operating room

PACU:

Post-anesthesia care unit

References

  • Bardram JE (2000) Temporal coordination. Comput Support Coop Work 9:157–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basson MD, Butler TW, Verma H (2006) Predicting patient nonappearance for surgery as a scheduling strategy to optimize operating room utilization in a veterans’ administration hospital. Anesthesiology 104:826–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM, Sheridan TB, Gandhi TK, Dwyer K et al (2006) A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery 139:159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coiera E (2000) When conversation is better than computation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7:277–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Coiera EW, Jayasuriya RA, Hardy J, Bannan A, Thorpe M (2002) Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust 176:415–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Dexter F, Macario A (2000) What is the relative frequency of uncommon ambulatory surgery procedures performed in the United States with an anesthesia provider? Anesth Analg 90:1343–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton R, Ho D, Hu P, Mackenzie C, Xiao Y (2005) Decision making by operating room managers: the burden of changes. Anesthesiology 103:A1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Espin S, Lingard L, Baker GR, Regehr G (2006) Persistence of unsafe practice in everyday work: an exploration of organizational and psychological factors constraining safety in the operating room. Qual Saf Health Care 15:165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg CC, Roth EM, Sheridan TB, Gandhi TK, Gustafson ML, Zinner MJ et al (2006) Making the operating room of the future safer. Am Surg 72:1102–1108

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006) Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49:589–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MSE (1999) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW, Crownston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput Surv 26:87–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire HH Jr, Horsley JS III, Salter DR, Sobel M (1992) Measuring and managing quality of surgery: statistical vs incidental approaches. Arch Surg 127:733–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MA, Sokal SM, Sandberg W, Chang Y, Daily B, Berger DL (2006) INCOMING!—A web tracking application for PACU and post-surgical patients. J Surg Res 132:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss J, Xiao Y (2004) Improving operating room coordination: communication pattern assessment. J Nurs Adm 34:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth C, O’Connor M, Klock PA et al (2006) Discovering healthcare cognition: the use of cognitive artifacts to reveal cognitive work. Organ Stud 27:1011–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit JJ, Carey A (2006) Estimating the duration of common elective operations: implications for operating list management. Anaesthesia 61:768–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick AS, Todd BA, Mullen JL, Morris JB (2006) How do surgical residents and non-physician practitioners play together in the sandbox? Curr Surg 63:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg W, Ryen S, Curran P, Seim A (2006) Causes of cancellations on the day of surgery at two major university hospitals. Anesthesiology 105:A1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenberg D (1999) Life in the fast lane—helpful tips for OR charge nurses. AORN J 69:941–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamuz M, Thomas EJ, Franchois KE (2004) Defining and classifying medical error: lessons for patient safety reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care 13:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler DC, Pasquariello CA, Chen CH (2003) Determining optimum operating room utilization. Anesth Analg 96:1114–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker S, Schwarz H (1999) Meeting of the board: the impact of scheduling medium on long term group coordination in software development. Comput Support Coop Work 8:175–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Hu P, Hu H, Ho D, Dexter F, Mackenzie CF et al (2005) An algorithm for processing vital sign monitoring data to remotely identify operating room occupancy in real-time. Anesth Analg 101:823–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Lasome C, Moss J, Mackenzie CF, Faraj S (2001) Cognitive properties of a whiteboard: a case study in a trauma centre. In: Prinz W, Jarke M, Rogers Y, Schmidt K, Wulf B (eds) Proceedings of the seventh european conference on computer-supported cooperative work. Kluwer, Bonn, pp 259–278

  • Xiao Y, Seagull FJ (2007) Emergent CSCW systems: the resolution and bandwidth of workplaces. Int J Med Inform 76(suppl 1):261–266

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank many people who were involved in the projects reported, including Mike Harrington, Kate Bott, Tomas Gal, Hao Hu, Caterina Lasome, Cheryl Plasters, Danny Ho, Steve Seebode, Deb Cooksey, Julie Ray, Paul Nagy, Peter Wieringa, Jos de Visser, Richard Dutton, and Doug Martz.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, Y., Hu, P., Moss, J. et al. Opportunities and challenges in improving surgical work flow. Cogn Tech Work 10, 313–321 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0087-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0087-7

Keywords

Navigation