Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive engineering and the moral theology and witchcraft of cause

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In keeping with the concerns of this special issue—while extending its empirical reach—we consider the influence that some fundamental ideas of Western society have had on how we look at failure and accountability in complex systems. We suggest that these may have gone somewhat unnoticed or been neglected by cognitive systems engineering and that this could undermine its agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey FG (1994) The witch-hunt: or, the triumph of morality. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2003) Report volume 1, August 2003. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington

  • Cook RI, Woods DD, Miller C (1998) A tale of two stories: contrasting views of patient safety. National Patient Safety Foundation, American Medical Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell A (2008) Criminal charges against continental in deadly concorde crash. The New York Times, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker SWA (2005) Ten questions about human error: a new view of human factors and system safety. Lawrence Erblaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M (1992) Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson K (1966) Wayward puritans. Wiley, New York, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferner RE, McDowell SE (2006) Doctors charged with manslaughter in the course of medical practice, 1795–2005: a literature review. J R Soc Med 99:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galison P (2000) An accident of history. In: Galison P, Roland A (eds) Atmospheric flight in the twentieth century. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 3–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gawande A (2002) Complications: a surgeon’s notes on an imperfect science. Picado, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Govan F (2008) Mechanics face manslaughter charge for Madrid air crash. The Daily Telegraph, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjicostis M (2009) Cyprus trial of Helios crash adjourned until April. The Washington Post, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Heft H (2001) Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Horns KM, Loper DL (2002) Medication errors: analysis not blame. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 31(3):347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learmount D, Modola P (2004) ATC body blasts Linate verdicts. Flight International, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennersand M (2008) Försoning (reconciliation). Forskning och Framsteg (Res Prog) 1:56–59

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill PM, Walton M (2002) Medical harm and the consequences of error for doctors. Med J Aust 176(5):222–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Mould RF (2000) Chernobyl record: the definitive history of the Chernobyl catastrophe. IOP, Piladelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pagels E (1988) Adam, Eve and the serpent. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (1999) Are we casting the net too widely in our search for the factors contributing to errors and accidents? In: Misumi J, Wilpert B, Miller R (eds) Nuclear safety: an ergonomics perspective. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock P (1998) Rules, boundaries and the courts: some problems in the Neo-Durkheimian sociology of deviance. British J Sociol 49(4):586–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotenberg M (2003) Damnation and deviance: the protestant ethic and the spirit of failure. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruitenberg B (2002) Court case against Dutch controllers. Controller 4(41):22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt S (2009) Some airlines require confidentiality deals before safety inspections. The Province, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrock S, Young M, Faulkner J, Braithwaite G (2004) Who moved my (Swiss) cheese? The (R)evolution of human factors in transport safety investigation. ISASI proceedings, session IX, pp 141–144

  • Sibbald B (2001) Ending the blame game key to overcoming medical error. CMAJ 165(8):1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook SA (2000) Friendly fire: the accidental shootdown of US Black Hawks over Northern Iraq. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas SM (2007) Outwitting the developed countries? Existential insecurity and the global resurgence of religion. J Int Aff 61(1):21–47

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoven MJ (2001) Moral responsibility and information technology. Erasmus University Center for Philosophy of ICT, Rotterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein I (ed) (1996) Open the social sciences: report of the Gulbenkian commission on the restructuring of the social sciences. Stanford University Press, Stanford

  • White L (1974) Death and the devil. In: Kinsman RS (ed) The darker visions of the renaissance: beyond the fields of reason. University of California Press, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson I (2001) Anxiety in a risk society. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD, Cook RI (2002) Nine steps to move forward from error. Cogn Tech Work 4:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. W. A. Dekker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dekker, S.W.A., Nyce, J.M. Cognitive engineering and the moral theology and witchcraft of cause. Cogn Tech Work 14, 207–212 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0203-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0203-6

Keywords

Navigation