Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trait, state or artefact? Assessing experts’ regulatory focus in nuclear power plant control

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We apply the theory of regulatory focus in the field of nuclear power plant (NPP) control. The first pilot study was conducted at the German simulator centre for NPPs. Here, we tested the influence of accident training lessons on the experts’ regulatory focus. In a second study, we tested and validated two chronically regulatory focus questionnaires to decide which measurement would be more suitable for future research. The Work Regulatory Focus scale was translated into German, and the Regulatory Concerns Questionnaire was adapted to a work environment. The combined evidence of both studies shows that the regulatory focus of the experts does not change during the training lessons. Study 2 shows that both questionnaires were able to adequately measure the regulatory focus, but that they produce artificially contradictory outcomes that could be misleading. Recommendations and considerations for using the questionnaires are provided. Theoretical and practical implications on the influence of experts’ regulatory focus on working and decision-making behaviour using standard procedures in NPP control are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beersma B, Homan AC, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW (2013) Outcome interdependence shapes the effects of prevention focus on team processes and performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 121:194–203. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner J, Higgins ET (2001) Regulatory focus theory: implications for the study of emotions at work. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 86:35–66. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner J, Paruchuri S, Idson LC, Higgins ET (2002) Regulatory focus and the probability estimates of conjunctive and disjunctive events. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 87:5–24. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das Simulatorzentrum KSG/GFS (2013) The task. http://www.simulatorzentrum.de. (Accessed 14 Jan 2013)

  • Faddegon K, Ellemers N, Scheepers D (2009) Eager to be the best, or vigilant not to be the worst: the emergence of regulatory focus in disjunctive and conjunctive group tasks. Group Process Intergroup Relat 12:653–667. doi:10.1177/1368430209339922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster J, Denzler M (2009) Die Theorie des regulatorischen Fokus. In: Brandstätter V, Otto J (eds) Handbuch der Psychologie: Motivation und Emotion. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Förster J, Higgins ET (2005) How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychol Sci 16:631–636. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster J, Higgins ET, Idson LC (1998) Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: regulatory focus and the “goal looms larger” effect. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:1115–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster J, Higgins ET, Taylor Bianco A (2003) Speed/accuracy in task performance: build-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 90:148–164. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00509-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman R, Förster J (2001) The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. J Pers Soc Psychol 81:1001–1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman CA, Meriac JP, Overstreet BL, Apodaca S, McIntyre AL, Park P, Godbey JN (2012) A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: work-related antecedents and consequences. J Vocat Behav 8:160–172. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamstra MRW, Van Yperen NW, Wisse B, Sassenberg K (2011) Fit between transformational-transactional leadership styles and followers’ regulatory focus reduces followers’ turnover intentions. J Pers Psychol 10:182–186. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws K, Dholakia UM, Bearden WO (2009) An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Soc Sci Res Netw (SSRN). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1422629. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1422629 (Accessed 12 May 2012)

  • Healey AN, Cacciabue PC, Berman J (2013) Human factors in nuclear safety: present and future. Cogn Technol Work 15:1–3. doi:10.1007/s10111-012-0212-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins ET (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain. Am Psychol 52:1280–1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins ET, Shah JY, Friedman RS (1997) Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator. J Pers Soc Psychol 72:515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins ET, Friedman RS, Harlow RE, Idson LC, Ayduk ON, Taylor A (2001) Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride. Eur J Soc Psychol 31:3–23. doi:10.1002/ejsp.27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt M (2014) Resilient use of emergency procedures. Lecture concerning experiments from the Institute for Energy Technology/OECD Halden Reactor Project. 05.02.2014. Technische Universität München. Institut of Ergonomics

  • Keller J, Bless H (2006) Regulatory fit and cognitive performance: the interactive effect of chronic and situational self-regulatory mechanism on cognitive test performance. Eur J Soc Psychol 36:393–405. doi:10.1002/ejsp.307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller J, Bless H (2008) When positive and negative expectancies disrupt performance: regulatory focus as a catalyst. Eur J Soc Psychol 38:187–212. doi:10.1002/ejsp.452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latimer AE, Rivers SE, Rench TA, Katulak NA, Hicks A, Hodorowski JK, Higgins ET, Salovey P (2008) A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fit messages for promoting physical activity. J Exp Soc Psychol 44:826–832. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Higgins ET, Choi HS (2000) Development of strategic norms in groups. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82:88–101. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood P, Jordan CH, Kunda Z (2002) Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:854–864. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert MJ, Kacmar KM, Carlson DS, Chonko LB, Roberts JA (2008) Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behaviour. J Appl Psychol 93:1220–1233. doi:10.1037/a0012695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin A, Dahlbäck N, Lundberg J (2013) A case study of factor influencing role improvisation in crisis response teams. Cogn Technol Work 15:79–93. doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0186-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacramento CA, Fay D, West MA (2013) Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 121:141–157. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Ellemers N, Scheepers D (2012) The attraction of social power: the influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility. J Exp Soc Psychol 48:550–555. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Scholl A (2013) If I can do it my way the influence of regulatory focus on job-related values and job attraction. J Econ Psych 38:58–70. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.003

  • Scholer A, Higgins ET (2011) Promotion and prevention systems: regulatory focus dynamics within self-regulatory hierarchies. In: Vohs KD, Baumeister RF (eds) Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications. Guilford, New York, pp 143–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Semin GR, Higgins ET, Gil de Montes L, Estourget Y, Valencia J (2005) Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: how abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. J Pers Soc Psychol 89:36–45. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville A, Roese NJ (2008) Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: a cautionary note. J Res Pers 42:247–254. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber B, Hertel G (2007) Motivation gains of inferior group members: a meta-analytical review. J Pers Soc Psychol 93:973–993. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woltin K-A, Jonas KJ (2012) Thinking deadline: the impact of regulatory focus on deadline descriptions and deadline behaviour. Eur J Soc Psychol 42:318–326. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1860

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) mbh, Forschungszentrum, Boltzmannstraße 14, 85748, Garching, Germany

    Johannes Beck

  2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Ergonomics, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85747, Garching, Germany

    Johannes Beck, Armin Eichinger & Klaus Bengler

Authors
  1. Johannes Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Armin Eichinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Klaus Bengler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Beck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beck, J., Eichinger, A. & Bengler, K. Trait, state or artefact? Assessing experts’ regulatory focus in nuclear power plant control. Cogn Tech Work 16, 531–539 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0283-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0283-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation