Abstract
This study investigates tactile reasoning in relation to sense-making in the context of designing a new non-traditional information environment. We define tactile reasoning as an interaction technique that supports analytical reasoning by the direct manipulation of information objects in the graphical user interface. When people directly manipulate data, for example, by moving individual pieces of information to create temporary groups or sequences or by eliminating pieces of information from a group, we hypothesize that this can enhance their sense-making and analytical reasoning ability by helping them discover new explanatory relationships created by the rearranged pieces of information. Our study used a card-sorting task where participants were either allowed or not allowed to touch and manipulate the cards to look for information or to construct groups of information that could provide meaningful explanations. Participants were asked to think aloud as they constructed an understanding of the information contained in the cards. Results showed that being able to manipulate the cards has a positive effect on analytical reasoning performance. In the more difficult task conditions, participants who were allowed to use their hands were observed to make 99 sets of sense-making strategies, in comparison with the 50 by participants who were not allowed to use their hands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff RL (1989) From data to Wisdom. J Appl Syst Anal 16(1989):3–9
Antle AN, Droumeva M, Ha D (2009) Thinking with hands: an embodied approach to the analysis of children’s interaction with computational objects. In: Proceedings of extended abstracts of conference on human factors in computer systems (CHI’09). ACM Press Boston, USA, pp 3961–3966
Dix A (2008) Externalisation—how writing changes thinking. Interfaces 76:18–19
Fjeld M, Barendregt W (2008) Epistemic action: a measure for cognitive support in tangible user interfaces? In: Spink AJ, Ballintjin MR, Bogers ND, Grieco F, Loijens LWS, Noldus PLPJJ, Smit G, Zimmerman PH (eds) Proceedings of measuring behaviour 2008, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Kidd AA (1994) The marks are on the knowledge worker. In: CHI'94 the annual conference of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, pp 186–191
Kirsh D (1995) Complementary strategies: why we use our hands when we think. Paper presented at the seventeenth annual conference of the cognitive science society, July 22–25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh
Kirsh D, Maglio P (1994) On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn Sci 18(4):513–549
Klein G, Moon B, Hoffman RF (2006) Making sense of sensemaking I: alternative perspectives. IEEE Intell Syst 21(4):70–73
Klein G, Philips JK, Rall EL, Peluso DA (2007) A data-frame theory of sense-making. In: Hoffman RR (ed) Expertise out of context: proceedings of the sixth international conference on naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, pp 113–155
Kodagoda N, Wong BLW, Rooney C, Khan N (2012) Interactive visualization for low literacy users: from lessons learnt to design. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012 the annual conference of the ACM special interest group on computer-human interaction. ACM Press, pp 1159–1168
Lonergran BJF (1957) Insight: a study of human understanding. Longmans, Green and Co., Ltd., London
Maglio PP, Matlock T, Raphaely D, Chernicky B, Kirsh D (1999) Interactive skill in Scrabble. In: Hahn M, Stoness SC (eds) Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference of the cognitive science society, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, 19–21 August 1999. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Mahwah, NJ
Pirolli P, Card S (2005) The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, 2-6 May 2005, McLean, VA. Mitre Corporation, pp 2–4
Rooney C, Attfield S, Wong BLW, Choudhury ST (2014) INVISQUE as a tool for intelligence analysis: the construction of explanatory narratives. Int J Hum Comput Interact 30(9):703–717
Rose S, Engel D, Cramer N, Cowley W (2010) Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. In: Berry MW, Kogan J (eds) Text mining: applications and theory. Wiley, New York
Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organisations. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9(4):625–636
Wong BLW (2003) Critical decision method data analysis. In: Diaper, Dan, Stanton, Neville (eds) The handbook of task analysis for human–computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, London, pp 327–346
Wong BLW, Bhimani N, Byrne E, Kodagoda N, Ham D-H, Khan N (2010) INVISQUE interactive visual search and query environment: final report for the JISC rapid innovation programme JISC Ref. No. IEDEVC19 / RI, Feb 2010. Middlesex University, London
Acknowledgments
This work was partly funded through the EPSRC Making Sense Project Grant Number EP/H023135/1. The work also benefited from the input of Neesha Kodagoda, Chris Rooney and Jane Barnett who provided valuable assistance to the undertaking of the research. The term “tactile reasoning” was suggested by our colleague, Tinni Choudhury as a way of describing the interaction that occurs at the INVISQUE user interface.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takken, S., Wong, B.L.W. Tactile reasoning: hands-on versus hands-off—What is the difference?. Cogn Tech Work 17, 381–390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0331-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0331-5