Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring factors related to users’ experience of public transport route choice: influence of context and users profiles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory study aims to achieve a better understanding of the users-related factors that affect the choice of routes in public transport (PT). We also look at what can motivate route and modes changes towards alternatives in a real situation. We investigated the experience of 19 users of PTs, using the critical incident technique (Flanagan in Psychol Bull 51(4):327, 1954). We asked participants to report incidents (i.e. situations) in cases they were very satisfied or dissatisfied with their choice. For both situations, the case of their usual route and case of an alternative were considered. A total of 91 incidents were collected and analysed using a multiple correspondences analysis. Additionally, users’ profiles were characterized and superposed to the analysis of incidents content. The main results are as follows. First, the user’s choice of PT route depends on the context (i.e. aim of the travel, time of day). Second, taking an alternative to the usual PT route or using a route combining different transport modes is determined by the context and by factors related to the pleasantness of the travel (e.g. to accompany a friend along the travel). Finally, depending on the user’s profile (i.e. combination of attitude towards PT and demographic variables), the factors taken into account to make the choice of a PT route are related to the efficiency or the pleasantness of the trip. These results show the importance of the contextual factors and the users’ profiles in route choice. They suggest that these factors should be further taken into account in new tools and services for mobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Zeid M, Witter R, Bierlaire M, Kaufmann V, Ben-Akiva M (2012) Happiness and travel mode switching: findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transp Policy 19(1):93–104. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastassova M, Burkhardt JM, Mégard C, Ehanno P (2005) Results from a user-centred critical incidents study for guiding future implementation of augmented reality in automotive maintenance. Int J Ind Ergon 35(1):67–77. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2004.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirão G, Cabral JS (2007) Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp Policy 14(6):478–489. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisseret A, Sebillotte S, Falzon P (1999) Techniques pratiques pour l’étude des activités expertes. Octarès, Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisbois X (2010) Le processus de décision dans le choix modal: importance des déterminants individuels, symboliques et cognitifs, Doctoral dissertation, Université Pierre Mendès-France-Grenoble II

  • Butterfield LD, Borgen WA, Amundson NE, Maglio AST (2005) Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954–2004 and beyond. Qual Res 5(4):475–497. doi:10.1177/1468794105056924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury S, Ceder A (2013) A psychological investigation on public-transport users’ intention to use routes with transfers. Int J Transp 1(1):1–20. doi:10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson L, Forward SE (2011) Is the intention to travel in a pro-environmental manner and the intention to use the car determined by different factors? Transp Res D: Transp Environ 16(5):372–376. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2011.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettema D, Friman M, Gärling T, Olson LE, Fujii S (2012) How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. J Transp Geo 24:215–222. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51(4):327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friman M (2010) Affective dimensions of the waiting experience. Transp Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav 13(3):197–205. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2010.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandit M (2007) Déterminants psychosociaux du changement de comportement dans le choix du mode de transport: le cas de l’intermodalité. Thèse de doctorat de troisième cycle en Psychologie sociale expérimentale de l’Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble 2

  • Hine J, Scott J (2000) Seamless, accessible travel: users’ views of the public transport journey and interchange. Transp Policy 7(3):217–226. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00022-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunecke M, Blöbaum A, Matthies E, Höger R (2001) Responsibility and environment ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Environ Behav 33(6):830–852. doi:10.1177/00139160121973269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöckner CA, Friedrichsmeier T (2011) A multi-level approach to travel mode choice–how person characteristics and situation specific aspects determine car use in a student sample. Transp Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav 14(4):261–277. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2011.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law ELC, Roto V, Hassenzahl M, Vermeeren AP, Kort J (2009) Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 719–728

  • Le Roux B, Rouanet H (2010) Multiple correspondence analysis. SAGE, series quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, SAGE, p 163

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman T (2008) Valuing transit service quality improvements. J Public Transp 11(2):43–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann E, Abraham C (2006) The role of affect in UK commuters’ travel mode choices: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Br J Psychol 97(2):155–176. doi:10.1348/000712605X61723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popuri Y, Proussaloglou K, Ayvalik C, Koppelman F, Lee A (2011) Importance of traveler attitudes in the choice of public transportation to work: findings from the Regional Transportation Authority Attitudinal Survey. Transportation 38(4):643–661. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9336-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubens L, Gosling P, Moch A (2011) Favoriser le report modal: connaître les raisons liées au choix d’un mode de déplacement pour le changer. Prat Psychol 17(1):19–29. doi:10.1016/j.prps.2009.12.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Timpf S (2002) Ontologies of Wayfinding: a traveler’s perspective. Netw Spat Econ 2(1):9–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken B, Aarts H, Van Knippenberg A (1997) Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. Eur J Soc Psychol 27(5):539–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vredin Johansson M, Heldt T, Johansson P (2006) The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 40(6):507–525. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.09.001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all public transports users who participated in the study. We also want to thank Philippe Bonnet for his help on statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elise Grison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grison, E., Gyselinck, V. & Burkhardt, JM. Exploring factors related to users’ experience of public transport route choice: influence of context and users profiles. Cogn Tech Work 18, 287–301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0359-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0359-6

Keywords

Navigation