Skip to main content
Log in

Proposing leading indicators for blood sampling: application of a method based on the principles of resilient healthcare

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, healthcare has put a growing attention to the investigation of successful processes as a supplement to analyzing and investigating unwanted processes, like adverse events and near misses. This new perspective paves the way for developing methods and tools for investigating and understanding how processes function, and how variability can contribute to both success and failure. In the light of this, we have developed a method applicable for identifying leading indicators for successful outcomes of complex healthcare processes. The method, which is termed leading indicator identification method (LIIM) was inspired from similar methods applied in high-risk industries. To demonstrate the usefulness of the method we have conducted a case study with the aim of identifying leading indicators for blood sampling among patients in a Biomedical Department within a Danish hospital. The method builds on and uses steps from the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM). FRAM was developed to analyze how work is performed on a daily basis, in complex systems and can be used prospectively to monitor, manage and control such systems. The contribution of the work is to present the LIIM along with four leading indicators that are important to consider in the planning, management and monitoring of the blood sampling process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braithwaite J, Clay-Williams R, Nugus P, Plumb J (2013) Health care as a complex adaptive system. In: Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J, Wears RL (eds) Resilient health care, vol 1. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (2000) Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Res Behav Sci 17(S1):S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay-Williams R, Hounsgaard J, Hollnagel E (2015) Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines. Implement Sci 10:125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA (2008) The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 17(3):216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edkins GD (1998) The INDICATE safety program: evaluation of a method to proactively improve airline safety performance. Saf Sci 30(3):275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Executive HaS (2001) A guide to measuring health and safety performance. UK: Health and Safety Executive

  • Executives HaS (2006) Developing process safety indicators: A step-by-step guide for chemical and major hazard industries. Suffolk, United Kingdom

  • Herrera I, Hovden J (eds) (2008) Leading indicators applied to maintenance in the framework of resilience engineering: a conceptual approach. Paper presented at the 3rd resilience engineering symposium

  • Herrera IA, Hollnagel E, Håbrekke S (2010) Proposing safety performance indicators for helicopter offshore on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. PSAM, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2012a) FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method—modelling complex socio-technical systems. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2012b) The method: the identification of variability (step 2). In: Hollnagel E (ed) FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method—modelling complex socio-technical systems. Ashgate, Surret

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2014) Safety-I and Safety-II: the past and future of safety management. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (2007) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounsgaard J (2016) Patient safety in everyday work, learning from things that go right [Master Thesis]. Odense University of Southern Denmark

  • Johnsen SO, Okstad E, Aas AL, Skramstad T (2012) Proactive indicators to control risks in operations of oil and gas fields. Soc Pet Eng 4(2):90–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawulich BB (2005) Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum Qualitative Social Res 6(2):43

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugaland K, Aase K, Waring J (2014) Hospital discharge of the elderly–an observational case study of functions, variability and performance-shaping factors. BMC Health Serv Res 14:365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N (2015) A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 136:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth C, Wears RL, Patel S, Rosen G, Cook R (2011) Resilience is not control: healthcare, crisis management, and ICT. Cogn Technol Work 13(3):189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Øien K, Utne IB, Herrera IA (2011a) Building safety indicators: part 1—theoretical foundation. Saf Sci 49(2):148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Øien K, Utne IB, Tinmannsvik RK, Massaiu S (2011b) Building safety indicators: part 2—application, practices and results. Saf Sci 49(2):162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paté-Cornell ME, Lakats LM, Murphy DM, Gaba DM (1997) Anesthesia patient risk: a quantitative approach to organizational factors and risk management options. Risk Anal 17(4):511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patriarca R, Bergström J (2017) Modelling complexity in everyday operations: functional resonance in maritime mooring at quay. Cogn Tech Work. doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0426-2

  • Peerally MF, Carr S, Waring J, Dixon-Woods M (2016) The problem with root cause analysis. BMJ Qual Saf 26(5):417–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry SJ, Wears RL (2012) Underground adaptations: case studies from health care. Cogn Technol Work 14(3):253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickup L, Atkinson S, Hollnagel E, Bowie P, Gray S, Rawlinson S et al (2017) Blood sampling: two sides to the story. Appl Ergon 59(Part A):234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raben DC, Hollnagel E (2014) Unpublished results—Exploring leading indicators in high-risk industries and what healthcare can learn? A systematic review on the literature

  • Raben C, Bie Bogh S, Viskum B, Mikkelsen KL, Hollnagel E (2017) Unpublished Results—Learn from what goes right: a demonstration of a new systematic method for identification of leading indicators in healthcare

  • Rafter N, Hickey A, Condell S, Conroy R, O’Connor P, Vaughan D et al (2015) Adverse events in healthcare: learning from mistakes. QJM 108(4):273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3:257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman T, Pietikäinen E (2014) Patient safety indicators as tools for proactive management and safety culture improvement. In: Waterson P (ed) Patient safety culture: theory, methods and application. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer SJ, Vogus TJ (2013) Reducing hospital errors: interventions that build safety culture. Annu Rev Public Health 34:373–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan MA, Huang H, Braithwaite J (2016) Learning from incidents in health care: critique from a Safety-II perspective. Safety Sci 99:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent C, Burnett S, Carthey J (2013) The measurement and monitoring of safety. The Health Foundation, London, p 2013

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Region Syddanmark.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ditte Caroline Raben.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raben, D.C., Bogh, S.B., Viskum, B. et al. Proposing leading indicators for blood sampling: application of a method based on the principles of resilient healthcare. Cogn Tech Work 19, 809–817 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0437-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0437-z

Keywords

Navigation