Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of task load on situation awareness and control strategy in the ATC tower environment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The safe and efficient operation of air traffic is highly dependent on the performance of the Air Traffic Control Officer (ATCO). The ATCOs control the traffic within defined areas by monitoring the traffic and granting clearances. A key element in analyzing the ATCOs is their interaction with the environment through their workplace. Especially the influence of task load on their situation awareness (SA) and applied control strategy provides information on the quality of the workplace. As task load increases, controllers are able to maintain performance by using different management or compensation strategies. This article supports the evaluation of ATCO’s workplaces by focusing on whether probe techniques for assessing SA are applicable for tower control operation and for measuring the influences of increased task load on the control strategy. An experiment with nine ATCOs was conducted in a simulated real-time air traffic control environment. Different measurements for SA were applied and compared regarding their efficiency and validity. The manipulation of task load and visibility influenced the SA and control strategy at the same time. Performance metrics were selected in advance to evaluate the participant’s efficiency. SA was measured with a probe technique and an offline self-assessment method. Findings suggest that probe techniques increase the insight into the understanding of SA in comparison to self-assessment and that they are applicable to the air traffic control environment. Control strategies were derived from the information-gathering process via the eye-movement behavior and connected to task load. The results imply that SA is part of the individual performance and that increasing demand through task load is handled with an adaptation of the control strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Observation Platform for the Technical and Institutional Consolidation of Safety Research; OPTICS, www.optics-project.eu/.

  2. According to EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs), incidents (potentially) affecting safety must be reported to the Accident/Incident Data Reporting (ADREP) of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Reportable_Incidents.

References

  • Ahlstrom U, Friedman-Berg FJ (2006) Using eye movement activity as a correlate of cognitive workload. Int J Ind Ergon 36:623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambroggi Md, Trucco P (2011) Modelling and assessment of dependent performance shaping factors through analytic network process. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:849–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon LP, Strybel TZ (2013) Assessment of the validity and intrusiveness of online-probe questions for situation awareness in a simulated air-traffic-management task with student air-traffic controllers. Saf Sci 56:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann M, Krems JF (2007) Situation awareness and driving: a cognitive model. In: Cacciabue PC (eds) Modelling driver behaviour in automotive environments. Springer, London, pp 253–265

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bolstad CA (2001) Situation awareness: does it change with age? In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 4. SAGE Publications Sage CA, Los Angeles, pp 272–276

  • Brookings JB, Wilson GF, Swain CR (1996) Psychophysiological responses to changes in workload during simulated air traffic control. Biol Psychol 42:361–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05167-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe DL, Strybel TZ, Vu K-PL (2012) Mechanisms for the acquisition of situation awareness in situated agents. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 13:625–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe D, Strybel TZ, Vu K-PL (2015) A situated approach to the understanding of dynamic situations. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 9:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343414559053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradini P, Cacciari C (2002) The effect of workload and workshift on air traffic control: a taxonomy of communicative problems. Cognit Technol Work 4:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox-Fuenzalida L-E (2007) Effect of workload history on task performance. Hum Factors 49:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehn DM (2008) Assessing the Impact of Automation on the Air Traffic Controller: The SHAPE Questionnaires. Air Traffic Control Q 16:127–146. https://doi.org/10.2514/atcq.16.2.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker SW (2015) The danger of losing situation awareness. Cognit Technol Work 17:159–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker SW, Woods DD (2002) MABA-MABA or abracadabra? Progress on human–automation co-ordination. Cognit Technol Work 4:240–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durso FT, Sethumadhavan A (2008) Situation awareness: understanding dynamic environments. Hum Factors 50:442–448. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008x288448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durso FT, Hackworth CA, Truitt TR, Crutchfield J, Nikolic D, Manning CA (1998) Situation awareness as a predictor of performance for en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Control Q 6:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards T (2013) Human performance in air traffic control. Dissertation, University of Nottingham

  • Endsley MR (1995a) Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 37:65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR (1995b) Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR (2000) Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. In: Endsley MR, Garland D (eds) Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, p 400

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR (2015) Situation awareness: operationally necessary and scientifically grounded. Cognit Technol Work 17:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR, Rodgers MD (1996) Attention distribution and situation awareness in air traffic control. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 2. SAGE Publications Sage, Los Angeles, pp 82–85

  • EUROCONTROL/FAA (2010) Human performance in air traffic management safety: a white paper. Action Plan 15 Safety

  • Flin R, Martin L, Goeters K-M, Hormann H, Amalberti R, Valot C, Nijhuis H (2003) Development of the NOTECHS (non-technical skills) system for assessing pilots’ CRM skills. Hum Factors Aerosp Saf 3:97–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich M, Rußwinkel N, Möhlenbrink C (2016) A guideline for integrating dynamic areas of interests in existing set-up for capturing eye movement: looking at moving aircraft. Behav Res Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0745-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry AF, Hale S (1996) Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychol Sci 7:237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry AF, Hale S (2000) Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biol Psychol 54:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenau N (2016) Virtual and remote control tower: research, design, development and validation. Springer, Switzerland, p 337

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenau N, Friedrich M, Mittendorf M, Schmidt M, Rudolph M (2013) Discriminability of flight maneuvers and risk of false decisions derived from dual choice decision errors in a videopanorama-based remote tower work position, vol 8020. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gontar P, Hoermann HJ (2015) Interrater reliability at the top end: measures of pilots’ nontechnical performance. Int J Aviat Psychol 25:171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2015.1162636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory T, Nettelbeck T, Howard S, Wilson C (2009) A test of the cascade model in the elderly. Personal Individ Differ 46:71–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin M, Neal A, Neale M (2000) The contribution of task performance and contextual performance to effectiveness: investigating the role of situational constraints. Appl Psychol 49:517–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley GA, Guttman JA, Stringer PG (1999) Air traffic control specialist performance measurement database (No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN99/17). William J Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City, NJ

  • Hendy KC (1995) Situation awareness and workload: birds of a feather? AGARD AMP symposium on ‘Situational Awareness: Limitations and Enhancements in the Aviation Environment, Brussels, 24–28 Apr 1995

  • International Organization for Standardization (1991) Ergonomic principles related to mental work-load vol ISO 10075:1991

  • Jeannot E (2000) Situation Awareness Synthesis and Literature Search (EEC Note No. 16/00). Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, France

  • Jeannot E, Kelly C, Thompson D (2003) The development of situation awareness measures in ATM systems. In: (HRS/HSP-005-REP-, 01) (eds), Brussels, Belgium. EUROCONTROL

  • Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Citeseer

  • Karikawa D, Aoyama H, Takahashi M, Furuta K, Ishibashi A, Kitamura M (2014) Analysis of the performance characteristics of controllers’ strategies in en route air traffic control tasks. Cognit Technol Work 16:389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass SJ, Cole KS, Stanny CJ (2007) Effects of distraction and experience on situation awareness and simulated driving. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 10:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkau F (2005) Biosignale der Pupille zur Steuerung intelligenter User-Interfaces: Untersuchung von Pupillenbewegungen zur Realisierung einer biopsychologischen Computerschnittstelle für die Mensch-Computer-Interaktion. Freie Universität Berlin

  • Kirwan B, Bettignies-Thiebaux B, Scholte J (2014) Optics: expert workshop: human factors. In: 1st expert workshop: human factors, Brussel

  • Kontogiannis T, Malakis S (2013) Strategies in controlling, coordinating and adapting performance in air traffic control: modelling ‘loss of control events’. Cognit Technol Work 15:153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer J, Süß H-M (2015) Real time validation of online situation awareness questionnaires in simulated approach air traffic control. Procedia Manuf 3:3152–3159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuk G, Arnold M, Ritter FE (1999) Effects of light and heavy workload on air traffic tactical operations: a hazard rate model. Ergonomics 42:1133–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange M (2014) Information search for decision-making in tower air traffic control: a field study. Tu Chemnitz, Chemnitz

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee YH, Jeon J-D, Choi Y-C (2012) Air traffic controllers’ situation awareness and workload under dynamic air traffic situations. Transp J 51:338–352. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.51.3.0338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loft S, Bowden V, Braithwaite J, Morrell DB, Huf S, Durso FT (2015) Situation awareness measures for simulated submarine track management. Hum Factors 57:298–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensen H (2014) Moderne Flugsicherung: organisation, Verfahren. Springer, Technik

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger U, Parasuraman R (2005) Automation in future air traffic management: effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload. Hum Factors 47:35–49. https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720053653802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papenfuss A, Friedrich M (2016) Head Up Only—a design concept to enable multiple remote tower operations 35th digital avionics systems conference

  • Papenfuss A, Friedrich M, Möhlenbrink C, Rudolph M, Schier S, Schmidt M, Fürstenau N (2010) Assessing operational validity of remote tower control in high-fidelity tower simulation. IFAC Proc Vol 43:117–122. https://doi.org/10.3182/20100831-4-FR-2021.00022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papenmeier F, Huff M (2010) DynAOI: a tool for matching eye-movement data with dynamic areas of interest in animations and movies. Behav Res Methods 41:179–187. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB, Wickens CD (2008) Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. J Cognit Eng Decis Mak 2:140–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten CJ, Kircher A, Ostlund J, Nilsson L, Svenson O (2006) Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments. Accid Anal Prev 38:887–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding RE (1992) Analysis of operational errors and workload in air-traffic-control proceedings of the human factors society, 36th annual meeting, vols 1 and 2, pp 1321–1325

  • Salmon PM, Stanton NA, Walker GH, Jenkins D, Ladva D, Rafferty L, Young M (2009) Measuring situation awareness in complex systems: comparison of measures study. Int J Ind Ergon 39:490–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton CL, Kinston R, Molyneux AJ, Ambrose LJ (2012) Real-time situation awareness assessment in critical illness management: adapting the situation present assessment method to clinical simulation BMJ Qual Saf:bmjqs-2012-000932

  • Sperandio J-C (1971) Variation of Operator’s strategies and regulating effects on workload. Ergonomics 14:571–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137108931277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperandio J-C (1978) The regulation of working methods as a function of work-load among air traffic controllers. Ergonomics 21:195–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137808931713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strater L, Tinsley M, Costello A, Colombo D, Endsley M (2010) Situation awareness requirements for optimized profile descent and integrated arrivals and departures. NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RM (1990) Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Paper presented at the Situational awareness: limitations and enhancement in the aviation environment, Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France

  • Teutsch J, Postma-Kurlanc A (2014) Enhanced virtual block control for Milan Malpensa Airport in low visibility. In: Integrated communications, navigation and surveillance conference (ICNS) 2014. IEEE, pp E1-1–E1-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/icnsurv.2014.6819984

  • Vidulich MA (2000) The relationship between mental workload and situation awareness. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 21. SAGE Publications, pp 3-460–463

  • Wickens CD (2002) Situation awareness and workload in aviation. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 11:128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, Mavor AS, McGee JP (1997) Flight to the future: human factors in air traffic control. National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C-W, Yang L-C, Cheng T-C, Jou Y-T, Chiou S-W (2012) Assessing mental workload and situation awareness in the evaluation of computerized procedures in the main control room. Nucl Eng Des 250:713–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.05.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young MS, Brookhuis KA, Wickens CD, Hancock PA (2015) State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research received funding from the German Aerospace Center institutional funding mechanism dedicated to the human center approach for automation, which is sponsored by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. German Aerospace Center, Lilienthalplatz 7, 38108, Brunswick, NI, Germany

    Maik Friedrich & Marcus Biella

  2. Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    Maresa Biermann, Patrick Gontar & Klaus Bengler

Authors
  1. Maik Friedrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maresa Biermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick Gontar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcus Biella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Klaus Bengler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maik Friedrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Friedrich, M., Biermann, M., Gontar, P. et al. The influence of task load on situation awareness and control strategy in the ATC tower environment. Cogn Tech Work 20, 205–217 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0464-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0464-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation