Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the relationships among specific technostress inhibitors (literacy facilitation, technical support provision, and involvement facilitation) and creators (techno-overload, techno-complexity, techno-insecurity, and techno-uncertainty) and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education. Data from 312 university teachers were analyzed through partial least squares structural equation modelling. The findings indicate that involvement facilitation, in particular, and technical support provision might have significantly curbing effects on three technostress creators (techno-overload, techno-complexity, and techno-insecurity). However, literacy facilitation as one technostress inhibitor might stimulate the development of technostress creators. As to the effect of technostress on university teachers’ work performance, techno-complexity and techno-insecurity had significant negative influence on their work performance. Nevertheless, techno-overload as one technostress creator was positively associated with their work performance. Meanwhile, literacy facilitation and involvement facilitation demonstrated positive effects on university teachers’ work performance. Additionally, the group comparison between young and senior university teachers suggested that literacy facilitation might more greatly boost two technostress creators (techno-overload and techno-complexity) for senior teachers than young teachers. Nonetheless, no gender difference was observed among university teachers in suffering from technostress. This study’s findings provide evidence-based support for policymakers and information and communication technology (ICT) providers in higher education to develop strategies for effective ICT integration in learning and teaching by accounting for university teachers’ technostress in the use of ICT in their work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Fudail M, Mellar H (2008) Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Comput Educ 51:1103–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atanasoff L, Venable MA (2017) Technostress: implications for adults in the workforce. J Career Dev Q 65:326–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brod C (1984) Technostress: the human cost of the computer revolution. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks S, Califf C (2017) Social media-induced technostress: its impact on the job performance of it professionals and the moderating role of job characteristics. Comput Netw 114:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform Syst Res 14:189–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillside

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dey EL, Burn HE, Gerdes D (2009) Bringing the classroom to the web: effects of using new technologies to capture and deliver lectures. Res High Educ 50:377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Mark Res 18:382–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuglseth AM, Sørebø Ø (2014) The effects of technostress within the context of employee use of ICT. Comput Hum Behav 40:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn M (2008) The future of higher education: How technology will shape learning. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182088/

  • Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Res Theor Pract 19:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hatlevik IK, Hatlevik OE (2018) Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Front Psychol 9:935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao KL (2017) Compulsive mobile application usage and technostress: the role of personality traits. Online Inf Rev 41:272–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung WH, Chen K, Lin CP (2015) Does the proactive personality mitigate the adverse effect of technostress on productivity in the mobile environment? Telemat Inform 32:143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang I, Cha O (2018) Examining technostress creators and role stress as potential threats to employees' information security compliance. Comput Hum Behav 81:282–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jena R (2015) Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: an empirical study among Indian academician. Comput Hum Behav 51:1116–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo YJ, Lim KY, Kim NH (2016) The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Comput Educ 95:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr-Wisniewski P, Lu Y (2010) When more is too much: operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity. Comput Hum Behav 26:1061–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchiori DM, Mainardes EW, Rodrigues RG (2019) Do individual characteristics influence the types of technostress reported by workers? Int J Hum-Comput Int 35:218–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz DM, Laha R, Perone BP, Pea RD, Bailenson JN (2018) Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Front Psychol 9:2364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortagus JC, Kramer DA, Umbricht MR (2018) Exploring the IT productivity paradox in higher education: the influence of IT funding on institutional productivity. J High Educ 89:129–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol 63:539–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragu-Nathan T, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan BS, Tu Q (2008) The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Inform Syst Res 19:417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salo M, Pirkkalainen H, Koskelainen T (2019) Technostress and social networking services: explaining users' concentration, sleep, identity, and social relation problems. Inf Syst 29:408–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez G (2013) PLS path modeling with R. Trowchez Editions, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellberg C, Susi T (2014) Technostress in the office: a distributed cognition perspective on human–technology interaction. Cogn Technol Work 16:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shedletsky LJ, Aitken JE (2001) The paradoxes of online academic work. Commun Educ 50:206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik EM, Skaalvik S (2017) Still motivated to teach? A study of school context variables, stress and job satisfaction among teachers in senior high school. Soci Psychol Educ 20:15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syvänen A, Mäkiniemi JP, Syrjä S, Heikkilä-Tammi K, Viteli J (2016) When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers? Seminar Net 12:95–109. https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/seminar/article/view/2281

  • Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan T (2010) Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. J Manag Inf Syst 27:303–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan T, Ragu-Nathan BS (2011) Crossing to the dark side: examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress. Commun ACM 54:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar M, Pullins EB, Ragu-Nathan T (2015) Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Inf Syst 25:103–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wæraas A, Solbakk MN (2009) Defining the essence of a university: lessons from higher education branding. High Educ 57:449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willaby HW, Costa DS, Burns BD, MacCann C, Roberts RD (2015) Testing complex models with small sample sizes: a historical overview and empirical demonstration of what partial least squares (PLS) can offer differential psychology. Pers Individ Differ 84:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinghua Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Appendix Tables 6, 7, 8.

Table 6 The survey instrument and the sources of the constructs
Table 7 Cross-loadings of variables in the measurement model
Table 8 Comparison between female and male teachers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Wang, X. Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education. Cogn Tech Work 23, 315–330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00625-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00625-0

Keywords

Navigation