Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A quantitative analysis of product categorization standards: content, coverage, and maintenance of eCl@ss, UNSPSC, eOTD, and the RosettaNet Technical Dictionary

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many e-business scenarios require the integration of product-related data into target applications or target documents at the recipient’s side. Such tasks can be automated much better if the textual descriptions are augmented by a machine-feasible representation of the product semantics. For this purpose, categorization standards for products and services, like UNSPSC, eCl@ss, the ECCMA Open Technical Dictionary (eOTD), or the RosettaNet Technical Dictionary (RNTD) are available, but they vary in terms of structural properties and content. In this paper, we present metrics for assessing the content quality and maturity of such standards and apply these metrics to eCl@ss, UNSPSC, eOTD, and RNTD. Our analysis shows that (1) the amount of content is very unevenly spread over top-level categories, which contradicts the promise of a broad scope implicitly made by the existence of a large number of top-level categories, and that (2) more expressive structural features exist only for parts of these standards. Additionally, we (3) measure the amount of maintenance in the various top-level categories, which helps identify the actively maintained subject areas as compared to those which ones are rather dead branches. Finally, we show how our approach can be used (4) by enterprises for selecting an appropriate standard, and (5) by standards bodies for monitoring the maintenance of a standard as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albers M, Jonker CM, Karami M, et al. (2004) Agent models and different user ontologies for an electronic market place. Knowl Inf Syst 6:1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beneventano D, Guerra F, Magnani S, et al. (2004) A Web Service based framework for the semantic mapping amongst product classification. J Electron Comm Res 5:114–127

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corcho O, Gómez-Pérez A (2001) Solving integration problems of e-commerce standards and initiatives through ontological mappings. In: CEUR workshop proceedings 47, Workshop on e-business and intelligent web, pp 131–140

  4. Fairchild AM, de Vuyst B (2002) Coding standards benefiting product and service information in e-commerce. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-35). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fensel D, Ding Y, Omelayenko B, et al. (2001) Product data integration in B2B e-commerce. IEEE Intell Syst 16:54–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fensel D, McGuinness DL, Schulten E, et al. (2001) Ontologies and electronic commerce. IEEE Int Syst 16:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fenton NE, Pfleeger SL (1996) Software metrics: a rigorous and practical approach. International Thomson Computer Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. He M, Leung HF (2002) Agents in e-commerce: state of the art. Knowl Inf Syst 4:257–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hepp M (2003) Güterklassifikation als semantisches Standardisierungsproblem. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hepp M (2004) Measuring the Quality of descriptive languages for products and services. In: Dorloff FD, Leukel J, Schmitz V (eds) E-business—Standardisierung und Integration. pp 157–168. Cuvillier, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hepp M (2005) Representing the hierarchy of industrial taxonomies in OWL: the gen/tax approach. In: CEUR workshop proceedings 155, Workshop semantic web case studies and best practices for eBusiness (SWCASE05), pp 49–56

  12. Hepp M, Leukel J, Schmitz V (2005a) Content metrics for products and services categorization standards. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on e-technology, e-commerce and e-service (EEE-05), pp 740–745. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hepp M, Leukel J, Schmitz S (2005b) A quantitative analysis of eCl@ss, UNSPSC, eOTD, and RNTD content, coverage, and maintenance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on e-business engineering (ICEBE 2005), pp 572–581. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hepp M, Bachlechner D, Siorpaes K (2005c) OntoWiki: community-driven ontology engineering and ontology usage based on Wikis. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international symposium on Wikis (WikiSym 2005)

  15. Hepp M (2006) Products and services ontologies: a methodology for deriving OWL ontologies from industrial categorization standards. Int J Semantic Web Inf Syst (IJSWIS) 2:72–99

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hepp M, Bachlechner D, Siorpaes K (2006) Harvesting Wiki consensus—using Wikipedia entries as ontology elements. In: CEUR workshop proceedings 206: SemWiki2006—from Wiki to Semantics

  17. Leukel J, Schmitz V, Dorloff FD (2002) A modeling approach for product classification systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th international workshop on database and expert systems applications (DEXA’02), pp 868–874. ACM Press, New York, NY

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Li H (2000) XML and industrial standards for electronic commerce. Knowl Inf Syst 2:487–497

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Magkanaraki A, Alexaki S, Christophides V, et al. (2002) Benchmarking RDF schemas for the semantic web. In: LNCS Vol. 2342, Proceedings of the first international semantic web conference (ISWC2002), pp 132–146. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Obrst L, Wray RE, Liu H (2001) Ontological engineering for B2B e-commerce. In: Proceedings of the international conference on formal ontology in information systems (FOIS’01), pp 117–126. ACM Press, New York, NY

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Omelayenko B (2001) Ontology integration tasks in business-to-business e-commerce. In: LNCS Vol. 2070, Proceedings of the 14th international conference on industrial & engineering applications of artificial intelligence & expert systems, pp 119–124. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schulten E, Akkermans H, Botquin G et al. (2001) The e-commerce product classification challenge. IEEE Intell Syst 16:86–89

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stonebraker M, Hellerstein JM (2002) Content integration for e-business. In: Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, pp 552–560. ACM Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  24. U.S. Census Bureau (2006) North American industry classification system (NAICS). Available at http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html. Retrieved March 15, 2006

  25. Yan G, Ng WK, Lim EP (2002) Product schema integration for electronic commerce—a synonym comparison approach. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 4:583–598

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Semantics in Business Information Systems Group, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 21a, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

    Martin Hepp

  2. Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA

    Martin Hepp

  3. University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany

    Joerg Leukel

  4. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

    Volker Schmitz

Authors
  1. Martin Hepp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joerg Leukel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Volker Schmitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hepp.

Additional information

A preliminary and shorter version of this paper was presented at the IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, ICEBE 2005.

Martin Hepp is a Senior Researcher at the Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) at the University of Innsbruck in Innsbruck, Austria, where he heads the research group “Semantics in Business Information Systems”. He created eClassOWL, the first industry-strength ontology for products and services and is currently working on using Semantic Web services technology for Business Process Management. Before joining DERI, he was an Assistant Professor of Computer Information Systems at Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers (FL) and a Visiting Scientist with the e-Business Solutions Group at the IBM Zurich Research Laboratory. Martin holds a Master’s degree in Business Management and Business Information Systems and a Ph.D. in Business Information Systems from the University of Wuerzburg (Germany).

Joerg Leukel is a Senior Researcher and Lecturer in the Department of Information Systems II at the University of Hohenheim in Stuttgart, Germany, where he leads the Logistics Research Group. Prior to this, he was with the University of Duisburg-Essen, where he earned a M.Sc. and a Ph.D. degree in Business Information Systems. His research interests are in the areas of inter-organizational information systems, supply chain management, product lifecycle management, semantic interoperability, business ontologies, and standardization.

Volker Schmitz is a Senior Researcher and Lecturer at the Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems at the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany. He holds a M.Sc. in Computer Science from RWTH Aachen University and is a member of several national and international standardization initiatives. Since 1999, he has been responsible for the development of the e-business standards BMEcat and openTRANS. His research and teaching interests include e-procurement, e-markets, catalog and product data management, product classifications, business ontologies, and standardization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hepp, M., Leukel, J. & Schmitz, V. A quantitative analysis of product categorization standards: content, coverage, and maintenance of eCl@ss, UNSPSC, eOTD, and the RosettaNet Technical Dictionary. Knowl Inf Syst 13, 77–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-006-0054-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-006-0054-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation