Skip to main content
Log in

An automatic human chromosome metaspread image selection technique

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The human chromosome metaspread images are used to generate the karyogram that is used for the diagnosis of the genetic defects. The genetic defects occur due to variation in either the structure of the chromosomes or the number of chromosomes present in the cell. The human chromosome metaspread image selection process is very critical in the karyogram generation task. It is very tedious and time-consuming process and is generally done manually by an expert cytogeneticist. The manual selection results may be biased, and it is possible that the whole search space is not explored to find the best metaspread image. The mood of the cytogeneticist will also greatly affect the selection results. So there is a strong need to automate the process of human chromosome metaspread image selection process. The proposed approach ranks the metaspread images based upon the quality score that is calculated using the count of the chromosomes of various orientations present in the metaspread image. The ranking has been done based upon ordinal ranking process, wherein a unique rank is assigned to each image based upon a set of rules. The rule base aids in the tiebreaking process in case the same quality score is derived for more than one metaspread image. The decision-making process of the expert cytogeneticist has been emulated by using a set of if–then rules. The proposed technique helps to select the best metaspread image, by exploring the complete set of images that can be used for the karyogram generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agam G, Member S, Dinstein H (1997) Geometric separation of partially overlapping nonrigid objects applied to automatic chromosome classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(11):1212–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alberts VV, Hillie KT, Demanet CM (2000) Atomic force microscopy imaging of polycrystalline CuInSe2 thin films. J Microsc. 197(Pt 2):206–215. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00652.x

  3. Arora T, Dhir R (2014) An efficient segmentation method for overlapping chromosome images. Int J Comput Appl 95(1):29–32. doi:10.5120/16560-4861

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arora T, Dhir R (2015) A review of metaphase chromosome image selection techniques for automatic karyotype generation. Med Biol Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s11517-015-1419-z

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arora T, Dhir R (2016a) A novel approach for segmentation of human metaphase chromosome images using region based active contours. Int Arab J Inf Technol, pp 1–5

  6. Arora T, Dhir R (2016b) Correlation based feature selection & classification via regression of segmented chromosomes using geometric features. Med Biol Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s11517-016-1553-2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arora T, Dhir R (2016c) Segmentation approaches for human metaspread chromosome images using level set methods. In: International conference on mass data analysis of images and signals MDA 2016 in New York

  8. Choi H, Bovik AC, Castleman KR (2006) Maximum-likelihood decomposition of overlapping and touching M-FISH chromosomes using geometry, size and color information. In: Twenty-eighth annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and society, New York

  9. Devaraj S, Vijaykumar VR, Soundrarajan GR (2013) Leaf biometrics based karyotyping of G-band chromosomes. Int J Hum Genet 13(3):131–138

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gujendran V, Rodriguez JJ (2004) Chromosome counting via digital image analysis. In: Proceedings of international conference on image processing. IEEE, pp 2929–2932

  11. Hall M (1999) Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning. PhD Thesis., Department of Computer Science, Waikato University, New Zealand (April)

  12. Huber R, Kulka U, Lörch T, Braselmann H, Bauchinger M (1995) Automated metaphase finding: an assessment of the efficiency of the METAFER2 system in a routine mutagenicity assay. ELSEVIER Mutat Res 334:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karvelis P, Likas A, Fotiadis DI (2010) Identifying touching and overlapping chromosomes using the watershed transform and gradient paths. Pattern Recogn Lett 31:2474–2488. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2010.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Munot MV (2011) Automated Karyotyping of Metaphase Cells with Touching Chromosomes. Int J Comput Appl 29(12):14–20

    Google Scholar 

  15. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. In: IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 62–66. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076

  16. Qiu Y, Chen X, Li Y, Chen WR, Zheng B, Li S, Liu H (2013) Evaluations of auto-focusing methods under a microscopic imaging modality for metaphase chromosome image analysis. Anal Cell Pathol 36:37–44. doi:10.3233/ACP-130077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ranking. (n.d.). Retrieved 24 Jan 2016. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ranking

  18. Shippey G, Carothers AD, Gordon J (1986) Operation and performance of an automatic metaphase finder based on the MRC fast interval processor. J Histochem Cytochem 34(10):1245–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Somasundaram D, Palaniswami S, Vijayabhasker R, Venkatesakumar V (2014) G-band chromosome segmentation, overlapped chromosome separation and visible band calculation. Int J Hum Genet 14(2):73–81

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tjio JH, Levan A (1956) The chromosome number of man. Genetics 10(6):80–85

    Google Scholar 

  21. Uttamatanin R, Yuvapoositanon P, Intarapanich A, Kaewkamnerd S, Phuksaritanon R, Assawamakin A, Tongsima S (2013) MetaSel: a metaphase selection tool using a Gaussian-based classification technique. BMC Bioinform 14:S13. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-S16-S13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Uttamatanin R, Yuvapoositanon P, Intarapanich A, Kaewkamnerd S, Tongsima S (2013) Band classification based on chromosome shapes. In: 13th international symposium on communications and information technologies (ISCIT), pp 464–468

  23. Van Den Berg HTCM, De France HF, Habbema JDF, Raatgever JW (1981) Automated selection of metaphase cells by quality. Cytometry 1(6):363–368. doi:10.1002/cyto.990010602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang X, Li S, Liu H, Wood M, Chen WR, Zheng B (2008) Automated identification of analyzable metaphase chromosomes depicted on microscopic digital images. J Biomed Inform 41(2):264–271. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2007.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wenzhong Y (2009) A counting algorithm for overlapped chromosomes. In: 3 rd international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering. IEEE, pp 1–3

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanvi Arora.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arora, T., Dhir, R. An automatic human chromosome metaspread image selection technique. Knowl Inf Syst 52, 773–790 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1024-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1024-6

Keywords

Navigation