Skip to main content
Log in

Mining maritime traffic conflict trajectories from a massive AIS data

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing volume of maritime traffic is proving a hindrance to navigational safety. Researchers have sought to improve the safety of maritime transportation by conducting statistical analysis on historical collision data in order to identify the causes of maritime collisions. However, this approach is hindered by the limited number of incidents that can be collected in a given area over a given period of time. Automatic Identification System (AIS) has made available enormous quantities of maritime traffic data. Trajectory data are collected through the electronic exchange of navigational data among ships and terrestrial and satellite base stations. Due to a massive AIS data of recording ship movement, such data provide great opportunity to discover maritime traffic knowledge of movement behavior analysis, route estimation, and the detection of anomalous behaviors. Our objective in this paper was to identify potential between-ship traffic conflicts through the discovery of AIS data. Traffic conflict refers to trajectories that could lead to a collision if the ships do not take any evasive action. In other words, conflicting trajectories can be treated as a near-collision cases for analysis. The prevention of collisions requires an efficient method by which to extract conflicting trajectories from a massive collection of AIS data. To this end, we developed a framework CCT Discovery that allows the automated identification of clusters of conflicting trajectories (CCTs) from AIS data without supervision. Experiments based on real-world data demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework in terms of accuracy and efficiency. For improvement in the navigational traffic safety, the discovered data of conflict trajectory can contribute to numerous applications, such as collision situation awareness and prediction, anti-collision behaviors modeling and recommendation, and conflict area analysis for maritime traffic flow management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AlRajie H, Ismail K (2016) Investigation of using microscopic traffic simulation tools to predict cyclist-vehicle-traffic conflicts at signalized intersections. In: Transportation research board 95th annual meeting, No. 16-4383

  2. Arguedas VF, Pallotta G, Vespe M (2014) Automatic generation of geographical networks for maritime traffic surveillance. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on information fusion (FUSION), pp. 1–8

  3. Cazzanti L, Millefiori LM, Arcieri G (2015) A document-based data model for large scale computational maritime situational awareness. In: Proceedings of 2015 IEEE international conference on big data, pp 1350–1356

  4. Chen Z, Shen HT, Zhou X (2011) Discovering popular routes from trajectories. In: Proceedings of 2011 IEEE 27th international conference on data engineering, pp 900–911

  5. Chin HC, Quek ST (1997) Measurement of traffic conflicts. Saf Sci 26(3):169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Debnath A, Chin H, Haque M (2011) Modelling port water collision risk using traffic conflicts. J Navig 64(1):645–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Debnath AK, Chin HC (2006) Analysis of marine conflicts. In: Proceedings of the 19th KKCNN symposium on civil engineering

  8. Debnath AK, Chin HC (2010) Navigational traffic conflict technique: a proactive approach to quantitative measurement of collision risks in port waters. J Navig 63(1):137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Basyouny K, Sayed T (2013) Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts. Saf Sci 51(1):160–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gettman D, Head L (2003) Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1840:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giannotti F, Nanni M, Pedreschi D (2006) Efficient mining of temporally annotated sequences. In: Proceedings of the 2006 SIAM international conference on data mining, pp 348–359

  12. Giannotti F, Nanni M, Pinelli F, Pedreschi D (2007) Trajectory pattern mining. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 330–339

  13. Guyet T, Quiniou R (2008) Mining temporal patterns with quantitative intervals. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE international conference on data mining workshops, pp 218–227

  14. Huang F, Liu P, Yu H, Wang W (2013) Identifying if vissim simulation model and ssam provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections. Accid Anal Prev 50:1014–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hung CC, Peng WC, Lee WC (2015) Clustering and aggregating clues of trajectories for mining trajectory patterns and routes. VLDB J Int J Very Large Data Bases 24(2):169–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeung H, Liu Q, Shen HT, Zhou X (2008) A hybrid prediction model for moving objects. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE 24th international conference on data engineering, pp 70–79

  17. Jeung H, Shen HT, Zhou X (2008) Convoy queries in spatio-temporal databases. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering, pp 1457–1459

  18. Kalnis P, Mamoulis N, Bakiras S (2005) On discovering moving clusters in spatio-temporal data. In: International symposium on spatial and temporal databases. Springer, pp 364–381

  19. Lai Z, Karim I, Xianghai M (2014) Traffic conflict techniques for road safety analysis: open questions and some insights. Can J Civ Eng 41(7):633–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JG, Han J, Li X, Gonzalez H (2008) Traclass: trajectory classification using hierarchical region-based and trajectory-based clustering. Proc VLDB Endow 1(1):1081–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JG, Han J, Whang KY (2007) Trajectory clustering: a partition-and-group framework. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, pp 593–604

  22. Lei P (2016) A framework for anomaly detection in maritime trajectory behavior. Knowl Inf Syst 47(1):189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lei P, Tsai T, Wen YT, Peng W (2017) A framework for discovering maritime traffic conflict from AIS network. In: 19th Asia-Pacific network operations and management symposium, APNOMS 2017, Seoul, Korea (South), September 27–29, 2017, pp 1–6

  24. Lei PR, Li SC, Peng WC (2013) Qs-stt: Quadsection clustering and spatial-temporal trajectory model for location prediction. Distrib Parallel Databases 31(2):231–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Q, Fan HSL (2012) A simulation model for detecting vessel conflicts within a seaport. Int J Mar Navig Saf Sea Transp 6(1):11–17

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li Z, Ding B, Han J, Kays R (2010) Swarm: mining relaxed temporal moving object clusters. Proc VLDB Endow 3(1–2):723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu CT, Lei PR, Peng WC, Su J (2011) A framework of mining semantic regions from trajectories. In: Proceedings of international conference on database systems for advanced applications, pp 193–207

  28. Mazzarella F, Arguedas VF, Vespe M (2015) Knowledge-based vessel position prediction using historical AIS data. In: IEEE workshop 2015 sensor data fusion: trends, solutions, applications (SDF), pp 1–6

  29. Monreale A, Pinelli F, Trasarti R, Giannotti F (2009) Wherenext: a location predictor on trajectory pattern mining. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 637–646

  30. Pallotta G, Vespe M, Bryan K (2013) Vessel pattern knowledge discovery from AIS data: a framework for anomaly detection and route prediction. Entropy 15(6):2218–2245

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Perkins SR, Harris JL (1968) Traffic conflict characteristics-accident potential at intersections. Highw Res Rec 225:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  32. Petelin B, Kononenko I, Malačič V, Kukar M (2013) Multi-level association rules and directed graphs for spatial data analysis. Expert Syst Appl 40(12):4957–4970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Petelin B, Kononenko I, Malačič V, Kukar M (2015) Dynamic fuzzy paths and cycles in multi-level directed graphs. Eng Appl Artif Intell 37:194–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Petzoldt T, Schleinitz K, Heilmann S, Gehlert T (2017) Traffic conflicts and their contextual factors when riding conventional versus electric bicycles. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 46:477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sang Lz, Yan Xp, Wall A, Wang J, Mao Z (2016) Cpa calculation method based on AIS position prediction. J Navig 69(6):1409–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Santos MY, Silva JP, Moura-Pires J, Wachowicz M (2012) Automated traffic route identification through the shared nearest neighbour algorithm. In: Bridging the geographic information sciences. Springer, pp 231–248

  37. Sayed T, Zaki MH, Autey J (2013) Automated safety diagnosis of vehicle-bicycle interactions using computer vision analysis. Saf Sci 59:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sayed T, Zein S (1999) Traffic conflict standards for intersections. Transp Plan Technol 22(4):309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shahdah U, Saccomanno F, Persaud B (2014) Integrated traffic conflict model for estimating crash modification factors. Accid Anal Prev 71:228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shie BE, Hsiao HF, Tseng V (2013) Efficient algorithms for discovering high utility user behavior patterns in mobile commerce environments. Knowl Inf Syst 37(2):363–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Silveira P, Teixeira A, Soares CG (2013) Use of ais data to characterise marine traffic patterns and ship collision risk off the coast of portugal. J Navig 66(6):879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sormunen OVE, Goerlandt F, Häkkinen J, Posti A, Hänninen M, Montewka J, Ståhlberg K, Kujala P (2014) Uncertainty in maritime risk analysis: extended case study on chemical tanker collisions. J Eng Marit Environ 124:142–157

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tan PN, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2013) Cluster analysis: basic concepts and algorithms. In: Introduction to data mining, pp 487–559

  44. Vespe M, Pallottaand G, Visentini I, Bryan K, Braca P (2012) Maritime trajectory mining for anomaly detection. In: Symposium on port and regional maritime security 2012

  45. Wei LY, Peng WC, Lee WC (2013) Exploring pattern-aware travel routes for trajectory search. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 4(3):48

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wei LY, Zheng Y, Peng WC (2012) Constructing popular routes from uncertain trajectories. In: Proc. the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD), pp 195–203

  47. Weng J, Meng Q, Qu X (2012) Vessel collision frequency estimation in the singapore strait. J Navig 65(2):207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wu G, Ding Y, Li Y, Bao J, Zheng Y, Luo J (2017) Mining spatio-temporal reachable regions over massive trajectory data. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 33rd international conference on data engineering (ICDE), pp 1283–1294

  49. Xue AY, Zhang R, Zheng Y, Xie X, Huang J, Xu Z (2013) Destination prediction by sub-trajectory synthesis and privacy protection against such prediction. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE 29th international conference on data engineering (ICDE), pp 254–265

  50. Yan W, Wen R, Zhang AN, Yang D (2016) Vessel movement analysis and pattern discovery using density-based clustering approach. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE international conference on big data (Big Data), pp 3798–3806

  51. Zhang W, Goerlandt F, Montewka J, Kujala P (2015) A method for detecting possible near miss ship collisions from ais data. Ocean Eng 107:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zheng K, Zheng Y, Yuan NJ, Shang S (2013) On discovery of gathering patterns from trajectories. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE 29th international conference on data engineering (ICDE), pp 242–253

  53. Zheng VW, Zheng Y, Xie X, Yang Q (2010) Collaborative location and activity recommendations with gps history data. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web, pp 1029–1038

  54. Zheng Y (2015) Trajectory data mining: an overview. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 6(3):29

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zheng Y, Xie X (2011) Learning travel recommendations from user-generated gps traces. Intell Syst Technol 2(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhou H, Hirasawa K (2018) Spatiotemporal traffic network analysis: technology and applications. In: Knowledge and information systems, pp 1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhu WY, Peng WC, Hung CC, Lei PR, Chen LJ (2014) Exploring sequential probability tree for movement-based community discovery. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(11):2717–2730

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Po-Ruey Lei was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, Project No. MOST-105-2221-E-012-003 and MOST-106-2221-E-012-004-MY2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Po-Ruey Lei.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, PR. Mining maritime traffic conflict trajectories from a massive AIS data. Knowl Inf Syst 62, 259–285 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-019-01355-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-019-01355-0

Keywords

Navigation