Skip to main content
Log in

Enabling user interface developers to experience accessibility limitations through visual, hearing, physical and cognitive impairment simulation

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

His paper presents a tool facilitating developers of user interfaces (UIs) to experience accessibility limitations that can be posed from various disabilities during the interaction of impaired users with their developments. In this respect, various aspects of visual, hearing, physical and cognitive impairments have been modelled through filters providing approximate, yet, realistic simulations over them. These filters have formed the basis for the developed tool, which can be used either on its own (as a standalone application), or be embedded in the NetBeans Integrated Development Environment. The tool, named DIAS, allows for impairment simulations to be performed over Java, mobile and web applications. Moreover, it integrates two of the most common assistive technologies (ATs), namely a screen reader and a magnifier. As a result, developers of UIs can not only experience how interaction would be affected from various impairments, but they can also understand how their developments would be perceived by impaired users through an AT. This work aims to provide an integrated, practical solution for impairment simulation, which could be easily adopted by developers, thus realistically increasing the possibilities for the future development of interactive applications that are more accessible to users with disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. High-quality versions of all the paper’s figures can be found at: http://160.40.50.182:8082/DIAS_UAIS/.

References

  1. American Optometric Association: Optometric clinical practice guideline: care of the patient with hyperopia (1997). http://www.aoa.org/documents/CPG-16.pdf

  2. Berson, E.L.: Retinitis pigmentosa. The Friedenwald Lecture. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34, 1659–1676 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas, P., Robinson, P.: Evaluating interface layout for visually impaired and mobility-impaired users through simulation. Universal Access in the Information Society pp. 1–18 (2011)

  4. Biswas, P.: Simulating HCI for special needs. SIGACCESS Access. Comput. (89), 7–10 (2007)

  5. Blessing, L.T., Chakrabarti, A.: Drm: A design research methodology. DRM—a Design Research Methodology, pp. 13–42. Springer, London (2009). http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1/page/1

  6. Boothroyd, A.: Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J. Speech Hear. Res. 27, 134–144 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley, S.: Hearing loss sampler. http://facstaff.uww.edu/bradleys/radio/hlsimulation/

  8. Bradski, G., Kaehler, A.: Learning OpenCV: computer vision with the OpenCV library. O’Reilly, New York (2008)

  9. Breiner, K., Wchner, T., Brunnlieb, M.: The disability-simulator: simulating the influences of disabilities on the usability of graphical user interfaces. In: Robertson, M. (ed.) Ergonomics and Health Aspects of Work with Computers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6779, pp. 109–118. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, M.M., Brown, G.C., Sharma, S., Landy, J., Bakal, J.: Quality of life with visual acuity loss from diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Arch. Ophthalmol. 120, 481–484 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burnham, R.W.: Color, a Guide to Basic Facts and Concepts. Wiley, New York (1963)

  12. Cardoso, C., Clarkson, P.J.: Simulation in user-centred design: helping designers to empathise with atypical users. J. Eng. Des. 23(1), 1–22 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elliott, D.B., Gilchrist, J., Whitaker, D.: Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity changes with three types of cataract morphology: are these techniques necessary in a clinical evaluation of cataract? Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 9, 25–30 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Faichild, M.D.: Color Appearance Models. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fluck, D.: Protanopia—red-green color blindness (2006). http://www.colblindor.com/2006/11/16/protanopia-red-green-color-blindness/

  16. Fujitsu Color Doctor. http://www.fujitsu.com/global/accessibility/assistance/cd/

  17. Fukumoto, I.: Computer simulation of parkinsonian tremor. J. Biomed. Eng. 8(1), 49–55 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenstein, V.C., Santos, R.A., Tsang, S.H., Smith, R.T., Barile, G.R., Seiple, W.: Preferred retinal locus in macular disease: characteristics and clinical implications. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 28, 1234–1240 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guez, J.E., Gargasson, J.F.L., Rigaudiere, F., O’Regan, J.K.: Is there a systematic location for the pseudo-fovea in patients with central scotoma? Vis. Res. 33(9), 1271–1279 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hartley, D.E.H.: Effects of conductive hearing loss on auditory temporal resolution. Ph.D. thesis (2000)

  21. Hartong, D., Berson, E., Dryja, T.: Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet 368, 1795–1809 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasdogan, G.: The role of user models in product design for assessment of user needs. Des. Stud. 17(1), 19–33 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Heijl, A., Lundqvist, L.: The frequency distribution of earliest glaucomatous visual field defects documented by automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh) 62, 658–664 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. IBM Adesigner. http://www-03.ibm.com/able/accessibility/services/adesigner.html

  25. Inclusive Design Toolkit Impairment Simulator. http://www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com/betterdesign2/simsoftware/simsoftware.html

  26. Java Access Bridge. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/index-jsp-136191.html

  27. JavaCV: Java interface to OpenCV. http://code.google.com/p/javacv/

  28. JAWS Screen Reader. http://www.freedomscientific.com/products/fs/jaws-product-page.asp

  29. Judd, D.B.: Contributions to color science. In: Macadams, D.L. (ed.), vol. 545. NBS, Washington (1979)

  30. Kalloniatis, M., Luu, C.: Psychophysics of vision: the perception of color (2011). http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/part-viii-gabac-receptors/color-perception

  31. Keates, S.: Designing user interfaces for ordinary users in extraordinary circumstances: a keyboard-only web-based application for use in airports. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 11(1), 1–12 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Keates, S., Clarkson, P., Robinson, P.: Design for participation: providing access to e-information for older adults. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 149–163 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Krill, A.E., Martin, D.: Photopic abnormalities in congenital stationary night blindness. Invest Ophthalmol. 10, 625–636 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lau, L.I., Liu, C.J., Chou, J.C., Hsu, W.M., Liu, J.H.: Patterns of visual field defects in chronic angle-closure glaucoma with different disease severity. Ophthalmology 110, 1890–1894 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Linksz, A.: An Essay on Colour Vision and Clinical Colour-vision Tests, p. 122. Grune & Stratton, New York (1964)

  36. Lundh, B.L., Lennerstrand, G.: Eccentric contrast sensitivity loss in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh) 59, 21–24 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mann, M.D.: The nervous system in action (2003). http://www.unmc.edu/physiology/Mann/mann7.html

  38. Margolin, V.: Getting to know the user. Des. Stud. 18(3), 227–236 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Miller-Guron, L., Lundberg, I.: Dyslexia and second language reading: a second bite at the apple? Read. Writ. 12, 41–61 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nathan, J.: Normal and abnormal colour vision. Aust. J. Optom. 50(5), 124–130 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  41. NetBeans Accessibility module (A11Y). http://wiki.netbeans.org/A11YShortly

  42. NetBeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE). http://netbeans.org/

  43. Nicolson, R.I., Fawcett, A.J., Dean, P.: Developmental dyslexia: the cerebellar deficit hypothesis. Trends Neurosci. 24(9), 508–511 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. NVDA Screen Reader. http://www.nvda-project.org/

  45. Personas of the ACCESSIBLE ontology. http://160.40.50.89/Accessible/Ontology/Version5.1/AccessibleOntologyOWLDoc/user.html

  46. Ripps, H.: Night blindness revisited: from man to molecules. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 23, 588–609 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A.: Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Pediatr. Rev. 24(5), 147–153 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Smith, V.C., Pokorny, J.: Large-field trichromacy in protanopes and deuteranopes. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 213–220 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stringham, J.M., Fuld, K., Wenzel, A.J.: Action spectrum for photophobia. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 20, 1852–1858 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. The DJ Native Swing Project. http://djproject.sourceforge.net/ns/

  51. Topouzis, F., Coleman, A.L., Yu, F., Mavroudis, L., Anastasopoulos, E., Koskosas, A., Pappas, T., Dimitrakos, S., Wilson, M.R.: Sensitivity and specificity of the 76-suprathreshold visual field test to detect eyes with visual field defect by Humphrey threshold testing in a population-based setting: the Thessaloniki eye study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 137, 420–425 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Vischeck tool. http://www.vischeck.com/

  53. VIS Simulator. http://vis.cita.uiuc.edu/

  54. WebAIM low vision simulator. http://webaim.org/simulations/lowvision

  55. Weber, J., Schultze, T., Ulrich, H.: The visual field in advanced glaucoma. Int. Ophthalmol. 13, 47–50 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Werner, E.B., Drance, S.M.: Early visual field disturbances in glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 95(7), 1173–1175 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Whittaker, S.G., Budd, J., Cummings, R.W.: Eccentric fixation with macular scotoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 29, 268–278 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  58. XUL Runner runtime. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XULRunner

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the EC FP7 project ACCESSIBLE—Accessibility Assessment Simulation Environment for New Applications Design and Development, Grant Agreement No. 224145 (http://www.accessible-eu.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Giakoumis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giakoumis, D., Kaklanis, N., Votis, K. et al. Enabling user interface developers to experience accessibility limitations through visual, hearing, physical and cognitive impairment simulation. Univ Access Inf Soc 13, 227–248 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0309-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0309-0

Keywords

Navigation