Skip to main content
Log in

Needs and attitudes of Singaporeans towards home service robots: a multi-generational perspective

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a study aiming to assess how users belonging to different generations perceive service robots in the home context, in order to gain insights of multiple aspects of user needs and attitudes towards robots as to inform the design of robots that are universally acceptable. Surveys with 30 subjects from 10 Singaporean families were conducted. These subjects belonged to three generations, namely young adults, working adults, and elderly people. The survey had two phases; during the first phase, interviews were conducted in users’ homes to assess their general attitudes and preferences of service robots. The second phase involved an interaction process between the users and a prototype robot in a simulated smart home environment. Users’ feedback was collected according to multiple aspects of robot usability and acceptability. It was found that users of all ages were wishing for service robots to help handle home chores, and they expected the robot to complete the task with good reliability and efficiency. However, users of different age groups showed different patterns of concerns over robot usage. A multi-generational perspective is helpful to understand users’ needs and attitudes that reflect age differences. It also provides insights into how members of a family share attitudes towards robots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meng, Q., Lee, M.H.: Design issues for assistive robotics for the elderly. Adv. Eng. Inform. 20, 171–186 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Graf, B., Hans, M., Schraft, R.D.: Care-O-bot II—development of a next generation robotic home assistant. Auton. Robots 16, 193–205 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L., Werry, I.: What is a robot companion—friend, assistant or butler? In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp 1192–1197 (2005)

  4. Ray, C., Mondada, F., Siegwart, R.: What do people expect from robots? In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ 2008 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nice, France, September 22–26. pp 3816–3821 (2008)

  5. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot 2, 361–375 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salvini, P., Laschi, C., Dario, P.: Design for acceptability: improving robots’ coexistence in human society. Int. J. Soc. Robot 2(4), 451–460 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, M.K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J.: Receptionist or information kiosk: how do people talk with a robot? In: CSCW 2010, Savannah, Georgia, USA., February 6–10. pp 31–40 (2010)

  8. Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C.: Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In: 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI’06), Salt Lake City, USA, March 2–4. pp 258–265 (2006)

  9. Takayama, L., Ju, W., Nass, C.: Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do, In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI’08), Amsterdam, Netherlands, March 12-15, 2008. pp 25–32 (2008)

  10. Kanda, T., Shiomi, M., Miyashita, Z., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: An affective guide robot in a shopping mall. In: 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, La Jolla, pp 173–180 (2009)

  11. Beer, J.M., Smarr, C.-A., Chen, T.L., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T.L., Kemp, C.C., Rogers, W.A.: The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. In: HRI’12, Boston, March 5–8. pp 335–342 (2012)

  12. Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., Janse, M.D.: Expressive robots in education. In: CHI 2010, Atlanta, USA, April 10–15. ACM, pp 1613–1622 (2010)

  13. Gallego-Perez, J., Lohse, M., Evers, V.: Robots to motivate elderly people: present and future challenges. In: The 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Gyeongju, Korea, August 26–29. pp 685–690 (2013)

  14. Pigini, L., Facal, D., Blasi, L., Andrich, R.: Service robots in elderly care at home: users’ needs and perceptions as a basis for concept development. Technol. Disabil. 24(4), 303–311 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khan, Z.: Attitudes towards intelligent service robots. Interaction and Presentation Laboratory, KTH, TRITA-NA-P9821, IPLab-154 (1998)

  16. Arras, K.O., Cerqui, D.: Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000-people survey. Autonomous Systems Lab, EPFL, Technical Report Nr. 0605-001 (2005)

  17. Maciuszek, D., Aberg, J., Shahmehri, N.: What help do older people need? Constructing a functional design space of electronic assistive technology applications. In: ASSETS’05, Baltimore, USA, October 9–12. pp 4–11 (2005)

  18. Young, J.E., Sung, J.-Y., Voida, A., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T., Christensen, H.I., Grinter, R.E.: Evaluating human–robot interaction: focusing on the holistic interaction experience. Int. J. Soc. Robot 3(1), 53–67 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sung, J., Grinter, R.E., Christensen, H.I.: Domestic robot ecology: an initial framework to unpack long-term acceptance of robots at home. Int. J. Soc. Robot 2(4), 417–429 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitsunaga, N., Miyashita, Z., Shinozawa, K., Miyashita, T.: What makes people accept a robot in a social environment. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nice, France, Sept 2008. pp 22–26 (2008)

  21. Libin, A., Libin, E.V.: Person–robot interactions from the robopsychologists’ point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach. Proc. IEEE 92, 1789–1803 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Musha, T., Kimura, S., Musha, T., Kimura, S.: Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by eeg. In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Alberta, Canada, 2–6 Aug, 2005. pp 1552–1557 (2005)

  23. Lee, M., Rittenhouse, M., Abdullah, H.A.: Design issues for therapeutic robot systems: results from a survey of physiotherapists. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 42, 239–252 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people. J. Phys. Agents 2(2), 33–40 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Young, J.E., Hawkins, R., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T.: Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology. Int. J. Soc. Robot 1(1), 95–108 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of healthcare robots for older population: review and future directions. Int. J. Soc. Robot 1, 319–330 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot 1, 71–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gross, H.-M., Schröter, C., Müller, S., Volkhardt, M., Einhorn, E., Bley, A., Langner, T., Merten, M., Huijnen, C., van den Heuvel, H., van Berlo, A.: Further progress towards a home robot companion for people with mild cognitive impairment. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (IEEE-SMC), Seoul, South Korea, 2013. pp 637–644

  29. Gross, H.-M., Schroeter, S., Mueller, S., Volkhardt, M., Einhorn, E., Bley, A., Martin, C., Langner, T., Merten, M.: Progress in developing a socially assistive mobile home robot companion for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2011), San Francisco, USA. pp 2430–2437 (2011)

  30. Schröter, C., Müller, S., Volkhardt, M., Einhorn, E., Huijnen, C., van den Heuvel, H., van Berlo, A., Bley, A., Gross, H.-M.: Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2013), Karlsruhe, Germany. pp 1145–1151 (2013)

  31. Gross, H.-M., Schröter, C., Müller, S., Volkhardt, M., Einhorn, E., Bley, A., Martin, C., Langner, T., Merten, M.: I’ll keep an eye on you: home robot companion for elderly people with cognitive impairment. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (IEEE-SMC 2011), Anchorage, USA. pp 2481–2488 (2011)

  32. Rehrl TaG, J., Golcar, M., Gentsch, S., Nobloch, J., Rigoll, G., Scheibl, K., Schneider, W., Ihsen, S., Wallhoff, F.: The robot ALIAS as a database for health monitoring for elderly people. In: Tagungsband des 6. Deutschen Ambient Assisted Living (AAL 2013), Kongresses, Berlin. pp 414–423 (2013)

  33. Geiger, J., Leykauf, T., Rehrl, T., Wallhoff, F., Rigoll, G.: The robot ALIAS as a gaming platform for elderly persons. In: Tagungsband des 6. Deutschen Ambient Assisted Living (AAL 2013), Kongresses, Berlin. pp 380–386 (2013)

  34. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Scopelliti, M., Siuliani, M.V., Fornara, F.: Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4(2), 146–155 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Frennert, S., Eftring, H., Östlund, B.: What older people expect of robots: A mixed methods approach. LNCS 8239, 19–29 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lehmann, H., Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Gelderblom, G.-J., Bedaf, S., Amirabdollahian, F.: What should a robot do for you? - Evaluating the needs of the elderly in the UK. In: The 6th International Conference on Advances in Computer–Human Interactions, Nice, France, February 24–March 1. pp 83–88 (2013)

  38. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Frennert, S., Eftring, H., Östlund, B.: Older people’s involvement in the development of a social assistive robot. LNCS 8239, 8–18 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mast, M., Burmester, M., Berner, E., Facal, D., Pigini, L., Blasi, L.: Semi-autonomous teleoperated learning in-home service robots for elderly care: a qualitative study on needs and perceptions of elderly people, family caregivers, and professional caregivers. In: The 20th International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics, Varna, Bulgaria. pp 1–6 (2010)

  41. Mast, M., Burmester, M., Krüger, K., Fatikow, S., Arbeiter, G., Graf, B., Kronreif, G., Pigini, L., Facal, D., Qiu, R.: User-centered design of a dynamic–autonomy remote interaction concept for manipulation-capable robots to assist elderly people in the home. J. Hum. Robot Interact. 1(1), 96–118 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bouma, H., Fozard, J.L., Bouwhuis, D.G., Taipale, V.: Gerontechnology in perspective. Gerontechnology 6(4), 190–216 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dautenhahn, K., Walters, M., Woods, S., Koay, K.L., Nehaniv, C., Sisbot, E.A., Alami, R., Simeon, T.: How may i serve you? A robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context. In: HRI’06, Salt Lake City, USA, March 2–4. pp 172–179 (2006)

  44. Buss, M., Carton, D., Gonsior, B., Kuehnlenz, K., Landsiedel, C., Mitsou, N., de Nijs, R., Zlotowski, J., Sosnowski, S., Strasser, E., Tscheligi, M., Weiss, A.D.W: Towards proactive human–robot interaction in human environments. In: International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, (2011)

  45. Butler, J.T., Agah, A.: Psychological effects of behavior patterns of a mobile personal robot. Auton. Robots 10(2), 185–202 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Carton, D., Turnwald, A., Wollherr, D., Buss, M.: Proactively approaching pedestrians with an autonomous mobile robot in urban environments. In: Desai, J.P. (ed.) Experimental Robotics, vol 88. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics Volume, pp 199–214. Springer, Québec City (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Koay, K.L.: Robotic etiquette: results from user studies involving a fetch and carry task. In: HRI’07, Arlington, March 8–11. pp 317–324 (2007)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qianli Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Q., Ng, J.S.L., Tan, O.Y. et al. Needs and attitudes of Singaporeans towards home service robots: a multi-generational perspective. Univ Access Inf Soc 14, 477–486 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0355-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0355-2

Keywords

Navigation