Skip to main content
Log in

An integrated semantic framework supporting universal accessibility to ICT

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As we are moving rapidly to a digital economy, accessing and effectively using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in everyday life is widely recognized as an important requirement. However, the accessibility technologies that we have up to date are meeting the needs of only some, at a very high cost and, as a consequence, accessible ICT for all people still remains a major research and development goal. This work presents an integrated ontological framework for the semantic representation of terms and concepts (i.e., related to user needs and preferences (N&P) with respect to ICT use, as well as solutions, platforms and devices) that are required for addressing the universal accessibility in the scope of the Cloud4all project and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII). Cloud4all aims at advancing and building upon the concept of GPII through the development of the necessary tools and models for making ICT accessible for all by exploiting the cloud computing paradigm. The main goal of the proposed framework lays in the separation between generalized accessibility concepts, user interaction mechanisms and N&P with the particular details of different ICT artifacts. Thus, the framework aims at integrating concepts related with user N&P, as well as ICT solutions, platforms, devices and their customizable settings along with information concerning their vendors or implementers, in order to (a) offer the necessary expressiveness for defining/representing personal N&P across applications, platforms and devices, (b) link N&P with the conditions/context according to which these shall be applicable for (e.g., considering the user activity and the physical environment), (c) link interaction requirements (originated from user characteristics) with N&P and (d) support the Cloud4all matchmaking process through the mapping between N&P and application-specific settings based on semantic rules and automatic reasoning techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the scope of this work, the term solution refers to a standalone application, an application offered as a service, a service or an assistive technology (AT) that “allows the user to perform an activity in a given environment, overcoming existing barriers” [4].

  2. http://www.eastin.eu/en-GB/searches/products/isoSearch/22.

  3. http://www.eastin.eu/en-GB/searches/products/isoSearch/24.

References

  1. Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII): http://gpii.net/ (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

  2. The Clou4all project: http://cloud4all.info/ (2012). Accessed Oct 2013

  3. Armbrust, M., et al.: A view of cloud computing. Commun. ACM 53(4), 50–58 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. European Thematic Network on Assistive Information and Communication Technologies, D2.2—Synopsis of the information needs: http://www.etna-project.eu/ftp/ETNA_DELIVERABLE_D2_2.pdf (2011). Accessed Oct 2013

  5. Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 43(5–6), 907–928 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prcela, M., Gamberger, D., Jovic, A.: Semantic web ontology utilization for heart failure expert system design. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 136, 851–856 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. O’Connor, M., Shankar, R., Tu, S.: Using semantic web technologies for knowledge-driven querying of biomedical data. Lecture Notes Artif. Intell. 4594, 267–276 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO/IEC 24751: Information technology—individualized adaptability and accessibility in e-learning, education and training (2008)

  9. ETSI ES 202 746: Human Factors (HF); Personalization and User Profile Management; User Profile Preferences and Information (2010)

  10. The AccessForAll standardization group: http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/ISO24751/AccessForAll+Working+Group (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

  11. ISO 9999:2011: Assistive Products for Persons with Disability—Classification and Terminology (2011)

  12. Heckmann, D., Schwartz, T., Brandherm B., Kröner, A.: Decentralized user modeling with UserML and GUMO. In: Dolog, P., Vassileva, J. (eds.). Proceedings of Decentralized, Agent Based and Social Approaches to User Modeling Workshop (DASUM), pp. 61–65. Edinburgh, Scotland (2005)

  13. RDF Primer: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/ (2004). Accessed Oct 2013

  14. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview: Available online via: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ (2004). Accessed Oct 2013

  15. Sutterer, M., Droegehorn, O., David, K.: UPOS: user profile ontology with situation-dependent preferences support. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction, Sainte Luce, Martinique, pp. 230–235 (2008)

  16. Yurchyshyna, A., Faron-Zucker, C., Le Thanh, N., Zarli, A.: Adaptation of the domain ontology for different user profiles: application to conformity checking in construction. In: Cordeiro, J., Filipe, J. (eds.). WEBIST 2009, LNBIP, Vol. 45, pp. 128–141 (2010)

  17. Panagiotopoulos, I., Seremeti, L., Kameas, A.: An alignable user profile ontology for ambient intelligence environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Environments, pp. 270–276 (2011)

  18. Hella, L., Krogstie, J.: A structured evaluation to assess the reusability of models of user profiles. In: Bider, I., et al. (eds.) BPMDS 2010 and EMMSAD 2010, LNBIP, vol. 50, pp. 220–233. Springer, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kobsa, A.: Generic user modeling systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) The Adaptive Web, LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 136–154. Springer, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. ISO/IEC 24751-2: “Access for all” personal needs and preferences for digital delivery (2008)

  21. ISO/IEC 24751-6: Information technology—framework for specifying a common access profile (CAP) of needs and capabilities of users, systems, and their environments (2008)

  22. Sala, P., Fernandez, C., Mocholí, J.B., Presencia, P., Naranjo, J.C.: Implementation of the ISO/IEC 24756 for the interaction modeling of an AAL space. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Context Diversity. LNCS, Vol. 6767, pp. 210–219 (2011)

  23. The VUMS project: http://www.veritas-project.eu/vums/ (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

  24. The GUIDE project: http://www.guide-project.eu/ (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

  25. The myUI project: http://www.myui.eu/ (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

  26. The VERITAS project: http://veritas-project.eu/ (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

  27. The VICON project: http://www.vicon-project.eu/ (2012). Accessed Oct 2013

  28. The ACCESSIBLE project: http://www.accessible-eu.org/ (2012). Accessed Oct 2013

  29. The AEGIS project: http://www.aegis-project.eu/ (2012) Accessed Oct 2013

  30. The ASK-IT project: http://www.ask-it.org/ (2009). Accessed Oct 2013

  31. Castro, A.G. Normann, I. Hois, J. Kutz, O.: Ontologizing metadata for assistive technologies—the OASIS repository. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Ontologies in Interactive Systems, Liverpool, UK, pp. 57–62 (2008)

  32. The INREDIS project: http://www.inredis.es/ (2012). Accessed Oct 2013

  33. Open Mobile Alliance: User Agent Profile v 2.0. http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/technical/release_program/docs/UAProf/V2_0-20060206-A/OMA-TS-UAProf-V2_0-20060206-A.pdf (2006). Accessed Oct 2013

  34. Schulz, M., Schmidt, S., Engelbrecht, K.-P., Möller, S.: Using device models for analyzing user interaction problems. In: Proceedings of 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS ‘11, pp. 303–304, New York (2011)

  35. LaPlant, B., Trewin, S., Zimmermann, G., Vanderheiden, G.: The universal remote console: a universal access bus for pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 3(1), 76–80 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. The EASTIN database: http://www.eastin.eu/ (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

  37. The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System: http://protege.stanford.edu/ (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

  38. Baader, F., et al.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  39. The GPII wiki: http://wiki.gpii.net/ (2012). Accessed Oct 2013

  40. The Cloud4all Use Cases: http://wiki.gpii.net/index.php/Use_Cases (2013). Accessed Oct 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007–2013) under Grant Agreement No 289016—the Cloud4all project. The authors would like to thank the Cloud4all partners for their influential contributions in the current work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vassilis Koutkias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koutkias, V., Kaklanis, N., Votis, K. et al. An integrated semantic framework supporting universal accessibility to ICT. Univ Access Inf Soc 15, 49–62 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0372-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0372-1

Keywords

Navigation