Abstract
With the thriving of different natural interaction paradigms—such as gesture-based interfaces—it becomes important to understand how these novel interfaces can influence users’ performance when it comes to their age. Recent advances made in human–computer interaction allow us to manipulate digital contents more intuitively; however, no work has yet been reported that systematically evaluates how gestural interfaces may influence the performance of different user groups. Different optical sensors, which allow human body acquisition with reliable accuracy, have been released, and with the appearance of such controllers for gesture recognition, it becomes important to understand if different age-related groups display similar performance levels concerning gestural interaction, or, on the other hand, if specific sensors could induce better results than others when dealing with users of different age brackets. In this article, we compare two gesture-sensing devices (Microsoft Kinect and Leap Motion) using the Fitts’ law model to evaluate target acquisition performance, with relation to three user groups: children, young adults and older adults. This case study involved 60 participants that were asked to perform a simple continuous selection task as quickly and accurately as possible using one of the devices for gestural recognition. Indeed, performance results showed statistically significant differences among the age groups in the selection task accomplished. However, when considering the users’ performance with regard to both input devices compared side by side, there were no significant differences in each group of users. We believe this situation could imply that the device itself might not have influenced the users’ performance, but actually the users’ age might. The participants feedback was interesting on account of their behaviors and preferences: Although there are no significant differences in performance, there could be when it comes to user preference.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accot, J., Zhai, S.: Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems the CHI is the Limit—CHI ’99, pp. 466–472. ACM Press, New York (1999). doi:10.1145/302979.303133. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=302979.303133
Anastasiou, D.: Gestures in assisted living environments. In: Efthimiou, E., Kouroupetroglou, G., Fotinea, S.E. (eds.) Gesture and Sign Language in Human–Computer Interaction and Embodied Communication, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7206. Springer, Berlin (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34182-3. http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-34182-3
Antle, A.N., Droumeva, M., Ha, D.: Hands on what? In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children—IDC ’09, p. 80. ACM Press, New York (2009). doi:10.1145/1551788.1551803
Beyer, H.: Tukey, John W.: Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Reading, Mass.—Menlo Park, Cal., London, Amsterdam, Don Mills, Ontario, Sydney, 1977, XVI, 688 S. Biometr. J. 23(4), 413–414 (1981). doi:10.1002/bimj.4710230408
Bill Buxton.: CES 2010: NUI with Bill Buxton. http://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/LarryLarsen/CES-2010-NUI-with-Bill-Buxton (2010)
Blake, J.: The natural user interface revolution. In: Natural User Interfaces in .NET, Chapter 1, pp. 1–43. Manning Publications Co, Greenwich (2012)
Bobeth, J., Schrammel, J., Deutsch, S., Klein, M., Drobics, M., Hochleitner, C., Tscheligi, M.: Tablet, gestures, remote control? In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video—TVX ’14, pp. 139–146. ACM Press, New York (2014). doi:10.1145/2602299.2602315. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2602299.2602315
Carvalho, D., Bessa, M., Oliveira, L., Guedes, C., Peres, E., Magalhães, L.: New interaction paradigms to fight the digital divide: a pilot case study regarding multi-touch technology. Proc. Comput. Sci. 14, 128–137 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.015
Carvalho, D., Bessa, M., Peres, E., Magalhães, L., Guedes, C., Oliveira, L.: Developing a multi-touch serious game to fight the digital divide: the Portuguese ATM—a pilot case study. In: 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–6. IEEE, Madrid (2012)
Carvalho, D., Bessa, M., Magalhães, L.: Different interaction paradigms for different user groups: an evaluation regarding content selection. In: Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction—Interaccion’14, p. 40. ACM, Puerto de la Cruz (2014). doi:10.1145/2662253.2662293
Carvalho, D., Bessa, M., Magalhaes, L., Carrapatoso, E.: Interaction paradigms versus age-related user profiles: an evaluation on content selection. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 13(2), 532–539 (2015). doi:10.1109/TLA.2015.7055575
Chen, W.: Gesture-Based Applications for Elderly People, Chapter Gesture-Ba, pp. 186–195. Springer, Berlin (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39330-3_20
Donker, A., Reitsma, P.: Young children’s ability to use a computer mouse. Comput. Educ. 48(4), 602–617 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.001. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1222672.1223015
Findlater, L., Froehlich, J.E., Fattal, K., Wobbrock, J.O., Dastyar, T.: Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’13, p. 343. ACM Press, New York (2013). doi:10.1145/2470654.2470703
Fitts, P.M.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 47(6), 381–391 (1954). doi:10.1037/h0055392. http://content.apa.org/journals/xge/47/6/381
Gerling, K., Livingston, I., Nacke, L., Mandryk, R.: Full-body motion-based game interaction for older adults. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’12, p. 1873. ACM Press, New York (2012). doi:10.1145/2207676.2208324. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2207676.2208324
Hilliges, O., Izadi, S., Wilson, A.D., Hodges, S., Garcia-Mendoza, A., Butz, A.: Interactions in the air. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology—UIST ’09, p. 139. ACM Press, New York (2009). doi:10.1145/1622176.1622203
Hoaglin, D.C., Iglewicz, B.: Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82(400), 1147–1149 (1987)
Holzinger, A. (ed.): HCI and Usability for Medicine and Health Care, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4799. Springer, Berlin (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76805-0. http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-540-76805-0
Inai, Y.: Age-related differences in pointing movements in restricted visual tasks and their design implication. In: 2013 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering, pp. 439–443. IEEE (2013). doi:10.1109/ICCME.2013.6548286
ISO.: ISO 9241-9 International standard: ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices: International Organization for Standardization. Tech. Rep. (2000)
ISO.: ISO 9241–400:2007: ergonomics of human–system interaction—Part 400: Principles and requirements for physical input devices: International Organization for Standardization. Tech. rep, International Organization for Standardization (2007)
Jain, J., Lund, A., Wixon, D.: The future of natural user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI EA ’11, p. 211. ACM Press, New York (2011). doi:10.1145/1979742.1979527
Joiner, R., Messer, D., Light, P., Littleton, K.: It is best to point for young children: a comparison of children’s pointing and dragging. Comput. Hum. Behav. 14(3), 513–529 (1998). doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00021-1
Jonsson, I.M., Nass, C., Min Lee, K.: Mixing personal computer and handheld interfaces and devices: effects on perceptions and attitudes. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 61(1), 71–83 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.11.005
Kjeldsen, R., Kender, J.: Toward the use of gesture in traditional user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pp. 151–156 (1996)
Królak, A., Strumiłło, P.: Eye-blink detection system for human–computer interaction. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 11(4), 409–419 (2011). doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0256-6. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10209-011-0256-6
Labs T.: Myo gesture control armband—wearable technology (2016). https://www.myo.com/
Lane, A.E., Ziviani, J.M.: Factors influencing skilled use of the computer mouse by school-aged children. Comput. Educ. 55(3), 1112–1122 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.008
Lemos, GCEMP.: Habilidades cognitivas e rendimento escolar entre o 5. e 12. anos de escolaridade. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade do Minho (2006)
Lievens, J., Van Daele, T.: Touch teach learn. Unlocking the potential of touch enabled mobile devices for higher education. In: INTED 2015 Proceedings 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, pp. 5298–5304 (2015)
Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 140, 55 (1932)
MacKenzie, I.S.: Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human–computer interaction. Hum. Comput. Interact. 7(1), 91–139 (1992). doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1461854.1461857
MacKenzie, I.S.: Movement time prediction in human–computer interfaces, pp. 483–492 (1995). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=212925.212969. http://www.yorku.ca/mack/GI92.html
MacKenzie, I.S., Kauppinen, T., Silfverberg, M.: Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’01, pp. 9–16. ACM Press, New York (2001). doi:10.1145/365024.365028. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=365024.365028
Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 43–52 (2003). doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_SlahUndXX6
Neerincx, M.A., Cremers, A.H.M., Kessens, J.M., van Leeuwen, D.A., Truong, K.P.: Attuning speech-enabled interfaces to user and context for inclusive design: technology, methodology and practice. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 8(2), 109–122 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10209-008-0136-x. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10209-008-0136-x
Newell, A., Card, S.: The prospects for psychological science in human–computer interaction. Hum. Comput. Interact. 1(3), 209–242 (1985). doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0103_1
Nielsen, J.: Noncommand user interfaces. Commun. ACM 36(4), 83–99 (1993). doi:10.1145/255950.153582. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=255950.153582
Osborne, J.W., Overbay, A.: The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 9(6) (2004). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=6
Oviatt, S.L.: Multimodal interfaces. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J.A. (eds.) The human–computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, Multimodal Interfaces, 2nd edn, pp. 413–432. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007)
PrioVR.: Priovr // suit up. game on. (2016) http://www.priovr.com/
Ren, Z., Meng, J., Yuan, J., Zhang, Z.: Robust hand gesture recognition with kinect sensor. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia—MM ’11, p. 759. ACM Press, New York (2011). doi:10.1145/2072298.2072443. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2072298.2072443
Rohs, M., Oulasvirta, A., Suomalainen, T.: Interaction with magic lenses. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’11, p. 2725. ACM Press, New York (2011). doi:10.1145/1978942.1979343. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1978942.1979343
Sambrooks, L., Wilkinson, B.: Comparison of gestural, touch, and mouse interaction with Fitts’ law. In: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer–Human Interaction Conference on Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration—OzCHI ’13, pp. 119–122. ACM Press, New York (2013). doi:10.1145/2541016.2541066. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2541016.2541066
Schapira, E., Sharma, R.: Experimental evaluation of vision and speech based multimodal interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Workshop on Percetive User Interfaces—PUI ’01, p. 1. ACM Press, New York (2001). doi:10.1145/971478.971481. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=971478.971481
Schubö, A., Vesper, C., Wiesbeck, M., Stork, S.: Movement Coordination in Applied Human–Human and Human–Robot Interaction, Chapter Movement C, pp. 143–154. Springer, Berlin (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76805-0_12
Shrawankar, U., Thakare, V.: Speech user interface for computer based education system. In: 2010 International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (CSIP), pp. 148–152 (2010)
Sodnik, J., Dicke, C., Tomažič, S., Billinghurst, M.: A user study of auditory versus visual interfaces for use while driving. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66(5), 318–332 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.001
Soukoreff, R.W., MacKenzie, I.S.: Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 61(6), 751–789 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.001
Stephanidis, C.: User interfaces for all: new perspectives into human–computer interaction. In: Stephanidis, C. (eds.) User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools, Chapter 1, p. 760. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)
Tecchia, F., Alem, L., Huang, W.: 3D helping hands. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry—VRCAI ’12, p. 323. ACM Press, New York (2012). doi:10.1145/2407516.2407590. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2407516.2407590
Toomim, M., Kriplean, T., Pörtner, C., Landay, J.: Utility of human–computer interactions. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’11, p. 2275. ACM Press, New York (2011). doi:10.1145/1978942.1979277. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1978942.1979277
van Dam, A.: Post-WIMP user interfaces. Commun. ACM 40(2), 63–67 (1997). doi:10.1145/253671.253708
Walter, R., Bailly, G., Müller, J.: StrikeAPose. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’13, p. 841. ACM Press, New York (2013). doi:10.1145/2470654.2470774. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2470654.2470774
Weichert, F., Bachmann, D., Rudak, B., Fisseler, D.: Analysis of the accuracy and robustness of the leap motion controller. Sensors (Basel Switz) 13(5), 6380–6393 (2013). doi:10.3390/s130506380. http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/13/5/6380/htm
Wigdor, D., Fletcher, J., Morrison, G.: Designing User Interfaces for Multi-touch and Gesture Devices, pp. 2755–2758. ACM, London (2009). doi:10.1145/1520340.1520399
Zhai, S., Kong, J., Ren, X.: Speed-accuracy tradeoff in Fitts’ law tasks—on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 61(6), 823–856 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.007
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support and contribution of “Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro” and the schools that took part in this study: “Monsenhor Jerónimo do Amaral,” “Escola Secundária Morgado de Mateus,” and the studies center “Super-Heróis,” all in Vila Real, Portugal. Diana Carvalho has a Ph.D. fellowship granted by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/81541/2011). This work is also supported by the project “R&D Project DOUROTUR - Tourism and technological innovation in the Douro/NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000014” is financed by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), under the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (2014/2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carvalho, D., Bessa, M., Magalhães, L. et al. Performance evaluation of different age groups for gestural interaction: a case study with Microsoft Kinect and Leap Motion. Univ Access Inf Soc 17, 37–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0518-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0518-4