Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating the accessibility of higher education institution websites in the State of Kuwait: empirical evidence

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the current state of accessibility of higher education institution websites in the State of Kuwait. Using a quantitative approach, websites of higher education institutions were evaluated for their conformance to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0) standard. A total of 41 higher education homepages and college landing pages were evaluated. The following software conformance tools and metrics were used: AChecker, Total Validator, WAVE and HTML/CSS/ARIA. The evaluation was followed by a systematic analysis of the results, a comparison to other areas of accessibility research, and putting forth a set of recommendations for the improvement in higher education website accessibility. None of the higher education websites fully conformed to the WCAG 2.0 Level A standard across all tools used. The lowest ranking pages (24% of all pages) had an error rate above 35% across all aspects of the WCAG 2.0 guidelines. The majority of errors, at both WCAG 2.0 levels A and AA, fell under the perceivable criteria. Overall, the analysis suggested that accessibility was not accounted for during the website development and that careful re-design and repair of current issues should be a top priority. There is an urgent need to solve accessibility violations in higher education institution websites in Kuwait to support people with disabilities. Educational institutions should develop and enforce policies and laws as well as increase awareness of the WCAG standard amongst IT managers and developers. The institutions should also invest in their developers’ accessibility training and research as well as account for routine reviews of their web pages by people with disabilities and experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and Oman.

  2. A comprehensive list of the Web evaluation accessibility tools can be found at https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/.

  3. https://validator.w3.org/.

  4. https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/.

References

  1. Abu Doush, I., Alhami, I.: Evaluating the accessibility of computer laboratories, libraries, and websites in Jordanian Universities and Colleges. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Soc. Change 9(2), 44–60 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSC.2018040104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. AChecker: ATRC web accessibility checker. http://achecker.ca/checker/index.php. Accessed 19 May 2018

  3. Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., Acosta, T., Salvador-Ullauri, L.: Toward a combined method for evaluation of web accessibility. In: Rocha, Á., Guarda, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Systems (ICITS 2018), pp. 602–613. Springer, Cham (2018)

  4. Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., Salvador-Ullauri, L.: Evaluation of the web accessibility of higher-education websites. In: 2016 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1–6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2016.7760703

  5. Acosta-Vargas, P., Acosta, T., Luján-Mora, S.: Challenges to assess accessibility in higher education websites: a comparative study of Latin America Universities. IEEE Access 6, 36500–36508 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aguillo, I.F., Ortega, J.L., Fernndez, M.: Webometric ranking of world universities: introduction, methodology, and future developments. High. Educ. Europe 33(2–3), 233–244 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802254031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmi, A., Mohamad, R.: Evaluating accessibility of malaysian public universities websites using achecker and wave. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. 15, 193–214 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Akgul, Y., Vatansever, K.: Web accessibility evaluation of government websites for people with disabilities in Turkey. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. (2016). https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.4.3.201-210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akram, M., Sulaiman, R.B.: A systematic literature review to determine the web accessibility issues in Saudi Arabian university and government websites for disable people. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (2017). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alahmadi, T., Drew, S.: Accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university websites in world, Oceania, and Arab categories for home, admission, and course description webpages. J. Open Flex. Distance Learn. 21(1), 7–24 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alayed, A., Wald, M., Draffan, E.A.: Challenges to enhancing web accessibility in Saudi university websites: an exploratory study. In: The Fourth International Conference on Building and Exploring Web Based Environments, pp. 6–9 (2016)

  12. Alhuwail, D., AlMeraj, Z., Boujarwah, F.: Evaluating hospital websites in Kuwait to improve consumer engagement and access to health information: a cross-sectional analytical study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0660-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ali, L., Ali, F., Surendran, P., Thomas, B.: Information systems accessibility of educational websites in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 7, 728–732 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.10.962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Khalifa, H.S.: The accessibility of saudi arabia government web sites: an exploratory study. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11(2), 201–210 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-010-0215-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Khalifa, H.S., Baazeem, I., Alamer, R.: Revisiting the accessibility of saudi arabia government websites. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 16(4), 1027–1039 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0495-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alshamari, M.: Accessibility evaluation of arabic e-commerce web sites using automated tools. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 9(9), 439–451 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2016.99029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burke, P.J.: The Right to Higher Education: Beyond Widening Participation, 1st edn. Routledge, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Contrast Checker (2019). https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  19. Duplaga, M.: Digital divide among people with disabilities: analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of internet use and activities performed online. PLoS ONE 12(6), e0179825 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonçalves, R., Rocha, T., Martins, J., Branco, F., Au-Yong-Oliveira, M.: Evaluation of e-commerce websites accessibility and usability: an e-commerce platform analysis with the inclusion of blind users. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 17(3), 567–583 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0557-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodwin, M., Susar, D., Nietzio, A., Snaprud, M., Jensen, C.S.: Global web accessibility analysis of national government portals and ministry web sites. J. Inf. Technol. Politics 8(1), 41–67 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2010.508011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huerta, T.R., Hefner, J.L., Ford, E.W., McAlearney, A.S., Menachemi, N.: Hospital website rankings in the United States: expanding benchmarks and standards for effective consumer engagement. J. Med. Internet Res. 16(2), e64 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. İşeri, Eİ., Uyar, K., İlhan, Ü.: The accessibility of Cyprus Islands higher education institution websites. Procedia Comput. Sci. 120, 967–974 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K.: Accessibility of Indian universities homepages: an exploratory study. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 30(2), 268–278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 17(2), 437–445 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0541-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamal, I.W., Wahsheh, H.A., Alsmadi, I.M., Al-Kabi, M.N.: Evaluating web accessibility metrics for Jordanian universities. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (2016). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamoun, F., Almourad, M.B.: Accessibility as an integral factor in e-government web site evaluation: the case of Dubai e-government. Inf. Technol. People 27(2), 208–228 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2013-0130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kesswani, N., Kumar, S.: Accessibility analysis of websites of educational institutions. Perspect. Sci. 8, 210–212 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kurt, S.: Moving toward a universally accessible web: web accessibility and education. Assist. Technol. 31(4), 199–208 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2017.1414086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A., Greenidge, K.D.: Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 20(2), 269–288 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J., Malarkey, C.: What frustrates screen reader users on the web: a study of 100 blind users. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 22(3), 247–269 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310709336964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee, K.: Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: a historical view. Internet High. Educ. 33, 15–23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leitner, M.L., Strauss, C., Stummer, C.: Web accessibility implementation in private sector organizations: motivations and business impact. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 15(2), 249–260 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0380-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, Y.Q., Bielefield, A., McKay, P.: Are urban public libraries websites accessible to Americans with disabilities? Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 18(1), 191–206 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0571-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Manzoor, M., Hussain, W., Ahmed, A., Iqbal, M.J.: The importance of higher education website and its usability. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 1(2), 150–163 (2012). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbas.v1i2.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Moreno, L., Martinez, P.: Overlapping factors in search engine optimization and web accessibility. Online Inf. Rev. 37(4), 564–580 (2013). Acessed 11 Apr 2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mulloy, A.M., Gevarter, C., Hopkins, M., Sutherland, K.S., Ramdoss, S.T.: Assistive technology for students with visual impairments and blindness. In: Assistive Technologies for People with Diverse Abilities, pp. 113–156. Springer (2014)

  38. Nations, U.: Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (2006). https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/resources/general-assembly/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-ares61106.html

  39. Sandhu, A.K.: Foregrounding accessibility for user experience design. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas (2015)

  40. Shawar, B.A.: Evaluating web accessibility of educational websites. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 10(4), 4–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Solovieva, T.I., Bock, J.M.: Monitoring for accessibility and university websites: meeting the needs of people with disabilities. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 27(2), 113–127 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Spinczyk, D., Makowski, M., Kempa, W., Rojewska, K.: Factors influencing the process of learning mathematics among visually impaired and blind people. Comput. Biol. Med. 104, 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tashtoush, Y.M., Darabseh, A.F., Al-Sarhan, H.N.: The Arabian e-government websites accessibility: a case study. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), pp. 276–281 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IACS.2016.7476064

  44. The UN Sustainable Development Goals (2018). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300

  45. TotalValidator: Total validator. https://www.totalvalidator.com. Accessed 19 May 2018

  46. UNDP-Kuwait: “Kuwait Digital Accessibility Framework” workshop|UNDP in Kuwait (2018). http://www.kw.undp.org/content/kuwait/en/home/presscenter/articles/_kuwait-digital-accessibility-framework-workshop.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  47. UNDP-Kuwait: achieving Kuwait 2035 vision towards persons with disability (2018). http://www.kw.undp.org/content/kuwait/en/home/operations/projects/human_development/achieving-kuwait-2035-vision-towards-persons-with-disability.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  48. U.S. General Services Administration: IT Accessibility Laws and Policies. https://www.section508.gov/manage/laws-and-policies. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  49. Vigo, M., Brown, J., Conway, V.: Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, W4A ’13, pp. 1:1–1:10. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2461121.2461124

  50. Vigo, M., Brajnik, G.: Automatic web accessibility metrics: where we are and where we can go. Interact. Comput. 23(2), 137–155 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.01.001. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. W3C: World Wide Web consortium (W3C): introduction to web accessibility (WAI) (2018). https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro/. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  52. W3C: World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Introduction to Web Accessibility. https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  53. WAI: Web Accessibility Initiative WAI: Diverse abilities and barriers (2018). https://www.w3.org/WAI/people-use-web/abilities-barriers/. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  54. WAVE: WAVE Web accessibility tool. http://wave.webaim.org. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  55. WCAG2.0, W.: Web content accessibility guidelines. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  56. Weber, A.S., City, E.: Inclusive education in the gulf cooperation council. J. Educ. Instr. Stud. World 2(2), 85–97 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zainab AlMeraj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AlMeraj, Z., Boujarwah, F., Alhuwail, D. et al. Evaluating the accessibility of higher education institution websites in the State of Kuwait: empirical evidence. Univ Access Inf Soc 20, 121–138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00717-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00717-8

Keywords

Navigation