Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies indicate an increase in the abandonment rates of the use of Assistive Technology devices for several reasons: the non-participation of the user in the development of the technology, the lack of training and the non-adaptation of the device to the needs of users are the most reported complaints. In this context, this research aims to understand how users and developers (engineers and programmers) deal with Assistive Technology devices and whether the usability of a device can influence abandonment rates. We developed an electric-powered wheelchair system driven by eye tracking, and we performed usability tests (empirical and analytical evaluation methods) of this Assistive Technology device. The developed device was evaluated by two groups of volunteers: seven (7) developers with experience in Assistive Technology and five (5) users with severe motor disabilities. The participants found many usability issues in the developed system. We also realized that developers and users think differently about the development requirements of the device. Thus, it is possible to suggest that there is a need for discussion between developers and users before the development of an assisted device. Prior to the development of an Assistive Technology device, it is important to consider the opinion and point of view of users and developers. Following this path increases the chances that an assisted device will have a satisfactory usability evaluation and, consequently, user acceptance. In addition, there may be a decrease in abandonment rates on Assistive Technology devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.

References

  1. Bersch R. Introdução à Tecnologia Assistiva [Internet]. Porto Alegre - RS: Cedi - Centro Especializado em Desenvolvimento Infantil; 2013. Available from: http://www.assistiva.com.br/Introducao_Tecnologia_Assistiva.pdf

  2. Ravneberg, B.: Usability and abandonment of assistive technology. J Assist Technol. 6, 259–269 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dirks, S., Buhler, C.: Assistive technologies for people with cognitive impairments – Which factors influence technology acceptance? In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) Univers access human-computer interact methods, technology users UAHCI 2018 lecture notes computer science . Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carneiro, L., Rebelo, F., Filgueiras, E., et al.: Usability and user experience of technical aids for people with disabilities? A preliminary study with a wheelchair. Procedia Manuf. 3, 6068–6074 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wessels, R., Dijcks, B., Soede, M., et al.: Non-use of provided assistive technology devices: a literature overview. Technol Disabil. 15, 231–238 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Laurer A, Rust K, Smith R.: ATOMS Project Technical Report-Factor in Assistive Technology Device Abandonment: replacing “Abandonment” with “Discontinuance.” In: Lansdale MW., Ormerod TC, editors. Underst interfaces a Handb human-computer Interact [Internet]. 1994. Available from: http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-discontinuance.html

  7. Braccialli MP.: Qualidade de vida e novas tecnologias. In: Vilarta R, Guierrez GL, Carvalho TH, et al., editors. Campinas: IPES. p. 105–114 (2007)

  8. Brasil. Viver sem limite- Plano Nacial dos Direitos d Pessoa com Deficiência: SDH-PR/SNP2. 2013.

  9. Phillips, B., Zhao, H.: Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 5, 36–45 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elliott, M.A., Malvar, H., Maassel, L.L., et al.: Eye-controlled, power wheelchair performs well for ALS patients. Muscles and Nerve 60, 1–7 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dahmani, M., Chowdhury, M.E.H., Khandakar, A., et al.: An intelligent and low cost eye tracking system for motorized wheelchair control. Sensors 20, 3936 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, R., Li, Y., Yan, Y., et al.: Control of a wheelchair in an indoor environment based on a brain-computer interface and automated navigation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 24, 1–12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carlson, T., del Millán, J., R, : Brain-controlled wheelchairs. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 20, 65–73 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Porta, M., Ravarelli, A.: Some eye tracking solutions for severe motor disabilities. In: Hippe, Z.S., Kulikowski, J.L., Mroczek, T. (eds.) Hum – computer systems interact backgrounds Applications 2 Part 1, pp. 417–431. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. EyeTribe. The EyeTribe [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 1]. Available from: https://theeyetribe.com/theeyetribe.com/about/index.html.

  16. VisualStudio. Visual Studio [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 1]. Available from: https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/pt-br/.

  17. SM_Brasil. Seat Mobile do Brasil [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Oct 9]. Available from: http://www.seatmobile.com.br/sm2.asp.

  18. Jacob, R.J.: The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: what you look at is what you get. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 9, 152–169 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wardle, D.A.: The time delay in human vision. Phys Teach. 36, 442–444 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nielsen, J.: Usability engineering, 1st edn. Elsevier, United States of American (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerhardt-Powals, J.: Cognitive engineering principles for enhancing human-computer performance. Int J Humand-Computer Interact. 8, 189–211 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsui K. Developing heuristics for assistive robotics. Human-Robot Interact. ACM/IEEE International Conference; 2010. p. 193–194

  23. Tsui K. A process for developing specialized heuristics: case study in assistive robotics. Comput Sci Tech Rep. 2009;11

  24. Nielsen J. Why you only need to test with 5 users [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2017 Jul 15]. Available from: http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/~cengiz/cs540-485-soft-eng-fa14/resources/5userTesting.pdf

  25. Da Cruz, D.M.C., Emmel, M.L.G.: Políticas públicas de tecnlogia assitiva no Brasil: um estudo sobre a usabilidade e abandono por pessoas com Deficiência Física/Assistive Technology Public Policies in Brazil: a study about usability and abandonment. Rev FSA (Faculdade St Agostinho). 12, 79–106 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Torrens G. An evaluation of the potential order and priority of research methods, design heuristics within an Assistive Technology new product development process. Loughborought University; (2015)

  27. Braccialli, L.M.P.: Tecnologia assistiva: perspectiva de qualidade de vida para pessoas com deficiência. In: Vilarta, R., Guierrez, G.L., Carvalho, T.H.P.F. (eds.) Qual vida e novas Tecnol, pp. 105–114. IPES Editorial, Campinas (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stefano, F., Scherer, M.: Assistive technology assessment handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES). Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Assistive Technologies Group, Federal University of Uberlândia, Av Joao Naves de Avila 2160-Bloco 3N, Uberlandia, Brazil

    Ludymila R. Borges, Eduardo L. M. Naves & Angela A. R. Sa

Authors
  1. Ludymila R. Borges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eduardo L. M. Naves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Angela A. R. Sa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LRG developed the software, supervised the experiments and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. ELMN supervised, revised and gave the final approval of the manuscript. AARS has been involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content and has given final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela A. R. Sa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Approved by the Ethics Committee from Federal University of Uberlandia – Brazil. Prot. Number: CEP/UFU 37756614.0.0000.5152;

Consent to participate

Informed Consent Document was signed by the study participants and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Uberlandia – Brazil. Prot. Number: CEP/UFU 37756614.0.0000.5152;

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borges, L.R., Naves, E.L.M. & Sa, A.A.R. Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking. Univ Access Inf Soc 21, 1013–1022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00809-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00809-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation