Abstract
In recent years, services science has emerged as a discipline of increasing importance, and one that aims to promote service innovation and increase service productivity by aligning disparate scientific, management, and engineering perspectives. It emphasizes that service innovation should be capable of creating value for both service providers and consumers. To realize the core thinking of services science, that is, attaining high value and high productivity, service design has to incorporate many factors into its consideration. Based on the ideas of this new research field, we develop a personalized daily-life activity recommendation service that includes: information behavior, business value, and technology architecture as our service design considerations. Our services can be requested in a ubiquitous environment and include users’ contextual information which is an important factor in information behavior. With regard to IT architecture, we use service-oriented architecture (SOA) that provides the flexibility and extensiveness of technology, as well as permits new innovative services to be easily added.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe T (2005) What is service science? FRI research report no. 246, Fujitsu Research Institute
Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005a) Towards the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2005.99
Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005b) Personalization technologies: a process-oriented perspective. Commun ACM 48(10):83–90. doi:10.1145/1089107.1089109
Adomavicius G, Sankaranarayanan R, Sen S, Tuzhilin A (2005) Incorporating contextual information in recommender systems using a multidimensional approach. ACM Trans Inf Syst 23(1):103–145. doi:10.1145/1055709.1055714
Bettman JR, Johnson EJ, Payne JW (1991) Consumer decision making. In: Robertson T, Kassarjian H (eds) Handbook of consumer behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 50–84
Bitner MJ, Brown SW (2006) The evolution and discovery of services science in business schools. Commun ACM 49(7):73–78. doi:10.1145/1139922.1139952
Bitner MJ, Brown SW, Goul M, Urban S (2006) Services science journey: foundations, progress, challenges. services sciences, management and engineering-education for the 21st century conference, IBM Palisades, New York
Brozovsky L, Petricek V (2007) Recommender system for online dating service. eprint arXiv:cs/0703042. http://aps.arxiv.org/abs/cs/0703042
Cho S, Lee M, Jang C, Choi E (2006) Multidimensional filtering approach based on contextual information. International conference on hybrid information technology (ICHIT 2006)
Choo CW, Detlor B, Turnbull D (1998) A behavioral model of information seeking on the web-preliminary results of a study of how managers and IT specialists use the web. In: Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the American Society for information science, Pittsburgh, pp 290–302
Glushko RJ (2007) What is a service? Services science lecture series (INFO 290–16), University of California, Berkeley. http://dret.net/lectures/ssme-spring07/GlushkoNotes.pdf
Godbold N (2006) Beyond information seeking: towards a general model of information behavior. Information research 11(4), paper 269
Herlocker JL, Konstan JA, Terveen LG, Riedl JT (2004) Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1):5–53. doi:10.1145/963770.963772
Hidaka K (2006) Trends in services sciences in Japan and abroad. Sci Technol Trends Q Rev 19:35–47
Kaschek R, Matthews C, Schewe KD, Wallace C (2006) Information systems design: through adaptivity to ubiquity. Inf Syst E-Business Manage 4(2):137–158. doi:10.1007/s10257-005-0028-z
Klein NM, Yadav M (1989) Context effects on effort and accuracy in choice: an inquiry into adaptive decision making. J Consum Res 16:410–420
Maglio PP, Srinivasan S, Kreulen JT, Spohrer J (2006) Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Commun ACM 49(7):81–85. doi:10.1145/1139922.1139955
Paulson LD (2006) Services science: a new field for today’s economy. IEEE Comput Mag 39(8):18–21
Pettigrew KE, Fidel R, Bruce H (2001) Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annu Rev Inf Sci Tech 35:43–78 ARIST
Rust RT, Miu C (2006) What academic research tells us about service. Commun ACM 49(7):49–54. doi:10.1145/1139922.1139948
Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2000) Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender systems-a case study. In: Proceedings of the ACM WebKDD workshop
Sheth A, Verma K, Gomadam K (2006) Semantics to energize the full services spectrum. Commun ACM 49(7):55–61. doi:10.1145/1139922.1139949
Spohrer J, Maglio PP (2006) The emergence of service science: toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. IBM Almaden Research Center
Spohrer J, Riecken D (2006) Services science: introduction. Commun ACM 49(7):30–32. doi:10.1145/1139922.1139944
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Science Council Grants NSC95-2218-E-002-022/026, NSC96-3114-P-001-002-Y, and Intel Higher Education Research Grants on Digial Health (2006) and WiMAX (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, CY., Wu, YH. & Chou, SC.T. Toward a ubiquitous personalized daily-life activity recommendation service with contextual information: a services science perspective. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 8, 13–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-008-0107-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-008-0107-z