Abstract
In the past years equity exchanges have diversified their operations into business areas such as derivatives trading, post-trading services, and software sales. Securities trading and post-trading are subject to economies of scale and scope. The integration of these functions into one institution ensures efficiency by economising on transactions costs. Using balanced panel data from major equity exchanges over the period 2005–2008, we empirically analyse the effects of different business strategies on the costs per trade and the profitability of equity exchanges. The evidence confirms the existence of significant economies of scale. The evidence also shows that vertical integration increases the profitability of exchanges while diversification and horizontal integration reduces their profitability. Naturally, the increasing competition needs to be considered when analysing effects on profitability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Euronext merged the former national exchanges of Belgium, France, Netherlands, and Portugal. OMX merged seven exchanges based in the Scandinavian and Baltic countries.
Being responsible for issues of regulation and competition in the European financial market (for details see http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/financial-markets/clearing/index_en.htm).
Being responsible for a safe a stable payment system (for details see http://www.ecb.int/paym/t2s/html/index.en.html).
The exchanges were selected based on the statistics of the World Federation of Exchanges (2007). A horizontal business strategy is assumed if equities trading for more than one country is provided. Vertical integration is assumed if a share of at least 50% of a clearing and/or a settlement provider is held. Diversification is assumed if at least 10% of the revenues originate from non-equity trading or post-trading activities.
NYSE Euronext owns a stake of Euroclear, NASDAQ OMX operates CSDs in the eastern markets, and the London Stock Exchange owns the Italian CCP and CSD.
The markets where selected according to the Dow Jones Global Exchanges Index (Dow Jones Indexes 2007). Only exchanges primary focussing on equities where selected. The market value is calculated on the basis of the equity prices from Reuters from 2008-08-11.
For the following analysis the net profit ration was chosen instead of the ROI due to the availability of the data in the annual reports.
The data derives from the annual reports of the exchanges. In the table listed exchanges as well as not listed but for profit exchanges are included. The exchanges Euronext and OMX are listed separately as recent mergers are not reflected in all analysed annual reports.
Not included in Table 3 are Dubai Financial Market, Singapore Exchange, Osaka Securities Exchange and Tokyo Stock Exchange Group due to missing data.
The largest equity exchanges were selected according to the World Federation of Exchanges (2007) report. Only exchanges which published these information are listed. The costs and number of trades are from the annual reports of the exchanges or from the World Federation of Exchanges report 2007.
References
Annual Reports (2005–2008) Annual reports of 26 equity stock exchanges
Brealy RA, Myers SC (2000) Principles of corporate finance. McGraw-Hill, New York
Chlistalla M, Schaper T (2009) Modifying the balanced scorecard for a network industry—the case of the clearing industry. In: Godart C, Gronau N, Sharma S, Canals G (eds) Proceedings of the 9th IFIP conference on e-business, e-services, and e-society. Nancy, France
Domowitz I, Steil B (1999) Automation, trading costs, and the structure of the trading services industry, Brookings-wharton papers on financial services
Dow Jones Indexes (2007) Dow Jones global exchanges index—factsheet. http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/downloads/fact_info/Global_Exchg_Facts.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2008
Dyson B (2009) Fight to stay on the top, the trade, issue 19
EU Commission (2006) Draft working document on post-trading. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/financial-markets/docs/clearing/draft/draft_en.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2008
EU Commission (2009) SEC (2009) 905 staff working paper
European Central Bank (2007) ‘TARGET2-securities—the T2S blueprint. http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/t2sblueprint0703en.pdf. Retrieved 22 Nov 2009 (March 2007)
Groppelli A, Nikbakht E (2006) ‘Finance’, Barron’s educational series
Harris L (2003) Trading and exchanges. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hassan I, Schmiedel H (2003) ‘Do networks in the stock exchange industry pay off? European evidence’, bank of Finland discussion papers 2/2003
Kaplan R (1984) The evolution of management accounting. Account Rev 59(3):390–418
Knieps G (2006) Competition in the post-trade markets: a network economic analysis of the securities business. J Ind Compet Trade 6(1):45–60
Malkamäki M (2000) Economies of scale and implicit merger in stock exchange activities?’ http://fmg.lse.ac.uk/upload_file/40_malkamaki.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2008
Markides CC, Williamson P (1994) Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strateg Manag J 15:149–165
Nielsson U (2009) Stock exchange merger and liquidity: the case of Euronext. J Financ Mark 12(2):229–267
Oxera (2007) Methodology for monitoring prices, costs, and volumes of trading and post-trading activities. Report prepared for the European commission, July 2007
Pirrong C (2008) The industrial organization of execution, clearing and settlement in financial markets. CFS, DBAG and EFL research conference, Frankfurt, 13–14th June 2008
Schmiedel H (2001) Technological development and concentration of stock exchanges in Europe. Bank of Finland discussion paper 21
Schmiedel H, Malkamaki M, Tarkka J (2006) Economics of scale and technological developments in securities depository and settlement systems. J Bank Financ 30:1783–1806
Schwartz RA, Francioni R (2004) Equity markets in action. Wiley, Hoboken
Serifsoy B (2007a) Stock exchange business models and their operative performance. J Bank Financ 31:2978–3012
Serifsoy B (2007b) Demutualization, outsider ownership, and stock exchange performance: empirical evidence. Economics of Governance 9:4
Serifsoy B, Weiß M (2007) Settling for efficiency—a framework for the European securities transaction industry. J Bank Financ 31:3034–3057
Wendt F (2006) ‘Intraday margining of central counterparties: EU practice and a theoretical evaluation of benefits and costs. Netherlands Central Bank, Amsterdam
World Federation of Exchanges (2007) Cost and revenue survey 2007. http://www.world-exchanges.org/publications/2006%20Cost%20&%20Revenue%20Survey.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaper, T. Organising equity exchanges. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 10, 43–60 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-010-0155-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-010-0155-z