Skip to main content
Log in

Organising equity exchanges

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past years equity exchanges have diversified their operations into business areas such as derivatives trading, post-trading services, and software sales. Securities trading and post-trading are subject to economies of scale and scope. The integration of these functions into one institution ensures efficiency by economising on transactions costs. Using balanced panel data from major equity exchanges over the period 2005–2008, we empirically analyse the effects of different business strategies on the costs per trade and the profitability of equity exchanges. The evidence confirms the existence of significant economies of scale. The evidence also shows that vertical integration increases the profitability of exchanges while diversification and horizontal integration reduces their profitability. Naturally, the increasing competition needs to be considered when analysing effects on profitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Euronext merged the former national exchanges of Belgium, France, Netherlands, and Portugal. OMX merged seven exchanges based in the Scandinavian and Baltic countries.

  2. Being responsible for issues of regulation and competition in the European financial market (for details see http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/financial-markets/clearing/index_en.htm).

  3. Being responsible for a safe a stable payment system (for details see http://www.ecb.int/paym/t2s/html/index.en.html).

  4. The exchanges were selected based on the statistics of the World Federation of Exchanges (2007). A horizontal business strategy is assumed if equities trading for more than one country is provided. Vertical integration is assumed if a share of at least 50% of a clearing and/or a settlement provider is held. Diversification is assumed if at least 10% of the revenues originate from non-equity trading or post-trading activities.

  5. NYSE Euronext owns a stake of Euroclear, NASDAQ OMX operates CSDs in the eastern markets, and the London Stock Exchange owns the Italian CCP and CSD.

  6. The markets where selected according to the Dow Jones Global Exchanges Index (Dow Jones Indexes 2007). Only exchanges primary focussing on equities where selected. The market value is calculated on the basis of the equity prices from Reuters from 2008-08-11.

  7. For the following analysis the net profit ration was chosen instead of the ROI due to the availability of the data in the annual reports.

  8. The data derives from the annual reports of the exchanges. In the table listed exchanges as well as not listed but for profit exchanges are included. The exchanges Euronext and OMX are listed separately as recent mergers are not reflected in all analysed annual reports.

  9. Not included in Table 3 are Dubai Financial Market, Singapore Exchange, Osaka Securities Exchange and Tokyo Stock Exchange Group due to missing data.

  10. The largest equity exchanges were selected according to the World Federation of Exchanges (2007) report. Only exchanges which published these information are listed. The costs and number of trades are from the annual reports of the exchanges or from the World Federation of Exchanges report 2007.

References

  • Annual Reports (2005–2008) Annual reports of 26 equity stock exchanges

  • Brealy RA, Myers SC (2000) Principles of corporate finance. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chlistalla M, Schaper T (2009) Modifying the balanced scorecard for a network industry—the case of the clearing industry. In: Godart C, Gronau N, Sharma S, Canals G (eds) Proceedings of the 9th IFIP conference on e-business, e-services, and e-society. Nancy, France

  • Domowitz I, Steil B (1999) Automation, trading costs, and the structure of the trading services industry, Brookings-wharton papers on financial services

  • Dow Jones Indexes (2007) Dow Jones global exchanges index—factsheet. http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/downloads/fact_info/Global_Exchg_Facts.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2008

  • Dyson B (2009) Fight to stay on the top, the trade, issue 19

  • EU Commission (2006) Draft working document on post-trading. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/financial-markets/docs/clearing/draft/draft_en.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2008

  • EU Commission (2009) SEC (2009) 905 staff working paper

  • European Central Bank (2007) ‘TARGET2-securities—the T2S blueprint. http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/t2sblueprint0703en.pdf. Retrieved 22 Nov 2009 (March 2007)

  • Groppelli A, Nikbakht E (2006) ‘Finance’, Barron’s educational series

  • Harris L (2003) Trading and exchanges. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan I, Schmiedel H (2003) ‘Do networks in the stock exchange industry pay off? European evidence’, bank of Finland discussion papers 2/2003

  • Kaplan R (1984) The evolution of management accounting. Account Rev 59(3):390–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Knieps G (2006) Competition in the post-trade markets: a network economic analysis of the securities business. J Ind Compet Trade 6(1):45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkamäki M (2000) Economies of scale and implicit merger in stock exchange activities?’ http://fmg.lse.ac.uk/upload_file/40_malkamaki.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2008

  • Markides CC, Williamson P (1994) Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strateg Manag J 15:149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsson U (2009) Stock exchange merger and liquidity: the case of Euronext. J Financ Mark 12(2):229–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxera (2007) Methodology for monitoring prices, costs, and volumes of trading and post-trading activities. Report prepared for the European commission, July 2007

  • Pirrong C (2008) The industrial organization of execution, clearing and settlement in financial markets. CFS, DBAG and EFL research conference, Frankfurt, 13–14th June 2008

  • Schmiedel H (2001) Technological development and concentration of stock exchanges in Europe. Bank of Finland discussion paper 21

  • Schmiedel H, Malkamaki M, Tarkka J (2006) Economics of scale and technological developments in securities depository and settlement systems. J Bank Financ 30:1783–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz RA, Francioni R (2004) Equity markets in action. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Serifsoy B (2007a) Stock exchange business models and their operative performance. J Bank Financ 31:2978–3012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serifsoy B (2007b) Demutualization, outsider ownership, and stock exchange performance: empirical evidence. Economics of Governance 9:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Serifsoy B, Weiß M (2007) Settling for efficiency—a framework for the European securities transaction industry. J Bank Financ 31:3034–3057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt F (2006) ‘Intraday margining of central counterparties: EU practice and a theoretical evaluation of benefits and costs. Netherlands Central Bank, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • World Federation of Exchanges (2007) Cost and revenue survey 2007. http://www.world-exchanges.org/publications/2006%20Cost%20&%20Revenue%20Survey.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2008

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Schaper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaper, T. Organising equity exchanges. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 10, 43–60 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-010-0155-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-010-0155-z

Keywords

Navigation