Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From positive and negative cognition perspectives to explore e-shoppers’ real purchase behavior: an application of tricomponent attitude model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study developed a research model based on the tricomponent attitude model and explored factors influencing e-shoppers’ real purchase behaviors. This study showed that these determinants could be divided into positive and negative approaches. The research sample consisted of 385 valid respondents who are experienced users on Books.com.tw. This research study adopted the structural equation modeling to test the proposed model and the alternative models. The proposed model showed a good fit. In the proposed model, we found that both perceived risk and perceived value indirectly influence affective trust via cognitive trust. Both cognitive trust and affective trust enhance two commitment outcomes (calculative commitment and affective commitment). In addition, affective trust mediates the relationship between cognitive trust and affective commitment, and affective commitment mediates the relationship between affective trust and behavioral intention. Besides, satisfaction is the mediator between trust and commitment. In the moderating effect, we find satisfaction also moderates both the effects of cognitive trust on calculative commitment and the affective trust on affective commitment. This study also provides conclusions and practical implications to marketers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1973) Attitudes and normative beliefs: factors influencing behavioral intentions. J Pers Soc Psychol 2(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RE, Srinivasan SS (2003) E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: a contingency framework. Psychol Mark 20(2):123–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnould E, Price L, Zinkhan G (2004) Consumers, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal HS, Irving PG, Taylor SF (2004) A three-component model of customer commitment to service providers. J Acad Mark Sci 32(3):234–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer RA (1960) Consumer behavior as risk-taking. In: Hancock RS (ed) Proceeding of dynamic marketing for a changing world of 43rd national conference. America Marketing Association, Chicago, pp 389–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer HH, Grether M, Leach M (2002) Building customer relations over the Internet. Ind Mark Manage 31(2):155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty SE, Mayer M, Coleman JE, Reynolds KE, Lee J (1996) Customer-sales associate retail relationships. J Retail 72(3):223–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Bestavros A (2000) Banking industry walks ‘tightrope’ in personalization of Web services. Bank Syst Techol 37(1):54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A (2000) Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages. Syst Hum 30(4):411–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Next (2011) Top 50 of Taiwan e-commerce. Retrieved Oct 2011, http://mag.chinatimes.com/mag-cnt.aspx?artid=9796

  • Čater B, Čater T (2010) Emotional and rational motivations for customer loyalty in business-to-business professional services. Serv Ind J 29(8):1151–1169

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Barnes S (2007) Initial trust and online buyer behavior. Ind Manage Data Syst 107(1):21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Dubinsky AJ (2003) A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: a preliminary investigation. Psychol Mark 20(4):323–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH, Lee KP (2008) The role of personality traits and perceived values in persuasion: an elaboration likelihood model perspective on online shopping. Soc Behav Pers 36(10):1379–1400

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CM, Hsu MH, Lai H, Chang CM (2012) Re-examining the influence of trust on online repeat purchase intention: the moderating role of habit and its antecedents. Decis Support Syst 53(4):835–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung KH, Shin JI (2009) The relationship between site characteristics, relationship quality, and word of mouth. Int J Bus Inf 4(2):137–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Close AG, Kukar-Kinney M (2010) Beyond buying: motivations behind consumers’ online shopping cart use. J Bus Res 63(9/10):986–992

    Google Scholar 

  • Comegys C, Hannula M, Vaisanen J (2009) Effects of consumer trust and risk on online purchase decision-making: a comparison of Finnish and United States students. Int J Manage 26(2):295–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox DF, Rich SU (1964) Perceived risk and consumer decision-making: the case of telephone shopping. J Mark Res 1(4):32–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo ÁH, Rodríguez IA, Rodríguez DB (2008) Explaining B2C e-commerce acceptance: an integrative model based on the framework by Gatignon and Robertson. Int Comput 20(2):212–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby LA, Evans KR, Cowles D (1990) Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. J Mark 54(3):68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar PA, Dolen WM, Ruyter KD (2009) A dual-sequence framework for B2C relationship formation: moderation effects of employee communication style in online group chat. Psychol Mark 6(2):145–174

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cannière MH, De Pelsmacker P, Geuens M (2009) Relationship quality and the theory of planned behavior models of behavioral intentions and purchase behavior. J Bus Res 62(1):82–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M (1958) Trust and suspicion. J Conf Res 2(4):265–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WB, Monroe KB, Grewal D (1991) Effects of price, brand and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. J Mark Res 28(3):307–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsch MJ, Swanson SR, Kelly SW (1998) The role of relationship quality in the stratification of vendors as perceived by customers. J Acad Mark Sci 26(2):128–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastlick MA, Lotz SL, Warrington P (2006) Understanding online B-to-C relationships: an integrated model of privacy concerns, trust, and commitment. J Bus Res 59(8):877–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Electronic Commerce Times (2008) Disclosure of Books customer information. Retrieved Oct 2011, http://www.ectimes.org.tw/Shownews.aspx?id=081121002658

  • Electronic Commerce Times (2011a) Books online bookstores renamed toward comprehensive e-commerce development. Retrieved Oct 2011, http://www.ectimes.org.tw/Shownews.aspx?id=110105223334

  • Electronic Commerce Times (2011b) Paying to download e-Books is expected to growth. Retrieved Oct 2011, http://www.ectimes.org.tw/Shownews.aspx?id=5509

  • Featherman MS, Pavlou PA (2003) Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. J Hum Comput Stud 59(4):451–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker D (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao T, Sirgy MJ, Bird MM (2005) Reducing buyer decision-making uncertainty in organizational purchasing: can supplier trust, commitment, and dependence help? J Bus Res 58(4):397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino E, Johnson MS (1999) The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. J Mark 63(2):70–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaski JF, Nevin JR (1985) The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power sources in a marketing channel. J Mark Res 22(2):130–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D, Straub DW, Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Comm AIS 4(7):1–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen EK, Karahanna E, Straub DW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quart 27(1):51–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens I, Steenkamp JBEM, Scheer LK, Kumar N (1996) The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment: a trans-Atlantic study. Int J Res Mark 13(4):303–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Gounaris SP (2005) Trust and commitment influences on customer retention: insights from business-to-business services. J Bus Res 58(2):126–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Kim HW (2010) Value-driven Internet shopping: the mental accounting theory perspective. Psychol Mark 27(1):13–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson A, Johnson MD, Roos I (2005) The effects of customer satisfaction, relationship commitment dimensions, and triggers on customer retention. J Mark 69:210–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris L, Goode M (2004) The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics. J Retail 80(2):139–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Gremler DD (2002) Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: an integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. J Serv Res 4(3):230–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CL, Liu CC, Lee YD (2010) Effect of commitment and trust towards micro-blogs on consumer behavioral intention: a relationship marketing perspective. Int J Electron Bus Manag 8(4):292–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang LT, Cheng TC, Farn CK (2007) The mediating effect of commitment on customer loyalty towards e-brokerages: an enhanced investment model. Total Qual Manag 18(7):751–770

    Google Scholar 

  • InsightXplorer (2010) The online shopping and shopping goods surveys. Retrieved Nov 2011, http://www.insightxplorer.com/researchcase/index.html

  • Internet Data Center (2013) Worldwide digital marketplace model and forecast. Retrieved Oct 2013, http://www.ectimes.org.tw/Shownews.aspx?id=091214210713

  • Javier SG, Miguel AM, Luis CF, Rosa MRA (2007) Relationship quality of an establishment and perceived value of a purchase. Serv Ind J 27(2):151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin B, Park JY (2006) The moderating effect of online purchase experience on the evaluation of online store attributes and the subsequent impact on market response outcomes. Adv Consum Res 33(1):203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D, Grayson K (2005) Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. J Bus Res 58(4):500–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog KG, Sörbom I (2001) LISREL (Version 8.51). Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DJ (2012) An investigation of the effect of online consumer trust on expectation, satisfaction, and post-expectation. Inf Syst E Bus Manage 10:219–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim W, Han H (2008) Determinants of restaurant customers’ loyalty intentions: a mediating effect of relationship quality. J Qual Assur Hosp Tour 9(3):219–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Jin B, Swinney JL (2009) The role of e-tail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trust in online loyalty development process. J Retail Cons Serv 16(1):239–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Komiak SX, Benbasat I (2004) Understanding customer trust in agent-mediated electronic commerce, Web-mediated electronic commerce, and traditional commerce. Inf Technol Manag 5(2):181–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Scheer LK, Steenkamp JEM (1995) The effect of perceived interdependence on dealer attitudes. J Mark Res 32(3):348–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JD, Weigert A (1985) Trust as a social reality. Soc Foeces 63(4):967–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Li D (2002) Website? Investigating the continuous use of information systems from a relationship perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock

  • Li N, Yue R (2009) An empirical study on credibility of online word of mouth and its effects on consumers’ purchase behavior. Lib Inf Serv 53(22):133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Browne GJ, Chau PYK (2006a) An empirical investigation of Web site use using a commitment-based model. Decision Sci 37(3):427–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Browne GJ, Wetherbe JC (2006b) Why do Internet users stick with a specific Web site? A relationship perspective. Int J Electron Commer 10(4):105–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao C, Palvia P, Lin HN (2007) The roles of habit and Web site quality in e-commerce. Int J Inf Manage 26(6):469–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao C, Lin HN, Liu YP (2010) Predicting the use of pirated software a contingency model integrating perceived risk with the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Bus Ethics 91(2):237–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin JCC (2007) Online stickiness: its antecedents and effect on purchasing intention. Behav Inf Technol 26(6):507–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Market Intelligence and Consulting Institute (2013) Taiwan’s investigation and analysis of online users shopping behavior in 2010. Retrieved Oct 2011, http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/reports/reportlist.asp?rptype=AISPandptype=12

  • Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manage Rev 20(3):709–734

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister DJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal co-operation in organizations. Acad Manage J 38(1):24–59

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald GW (1981) Structural exchange and marital interaction. J Marriage Fam 43(4):825–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki A, Fernandez A (2001) Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. J Consum Aff 35(1):27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon MA, Bonney L (2007) An application of the investment model to buyer-seller relationships: a dyadic perspective. J Mark Theory Pract 15(4):335–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon JW, Kim YG (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Inf Manag 38(4):217–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman C, Zaltman G, Deshpande R (1992) Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. J Mark Res 29(3):314–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Mark 58(3):20–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Morwitz VG, Schmittlein D (1992) Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: which ‘intenders’ actually buy? J Mark Res 29(4):391–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen Media Research (2010) Online survey of global consumers. Retrieved Oct 2011, http://tw.nielsen.com/news20100628.shtml%E3%80%82

  • Nusair K (2007) A model of commitment in B-to-C travel context: a structural equation modeling. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Papaioannou E, Assimakopoulos C, Sarmaniotis C, Georgiadis CK (2013) Investigating customer satisfaction dimensions with service quality of online auctions: an empirical investigation of e-Bay. Inf Syst E Bus Manage 11:313–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Grewal D (2000) The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: a research agenda. J Acad Mark Sci 28(1):168–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrick JF (2002) Development of multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a service. J Leis Res 34(2):119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping R Jr (2004) On assuring valid measures for theoretical models using survey data. J Bus Res 57:125–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnasingham P (1998) The importance of trust in electronic commerce. Internet Res 8(4):313–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg MJ, Hanland JC (1960) Low-commitment consumer behavior. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 2(11):367–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg MJ, Hovland CI (1960) Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitude. In: Rosenberg MJ, Hovland CI (eds) Attitude organization and change: an analysis of consistency among attitude components. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult CE, Verette J, Whitney GA, Slovik LF, Lipkus I (1991) Accommodation processes in close relationships: theory and preliminary empirical evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 60(1):53–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar V, Smith AK, Rangaswamy A (2003) Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments. Int J Res Mark 20(2):153–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin DH (2007) Potential user factors driving adoption of IPTV: what are customers expecting from IPTV? Technol Forecast Soc Change 74(8):1446–1464

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin DH (2009) Determinants of customer acceptance of multi-service network: an implication for IP-based technologies. Inf Manag 46(1):16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh J, Sirdeshmukh D (2000) Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Acad Mark Sci 28(1):150–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirohi N, McLaughlin W, Wittink DR (1998) A model of consumer perceptions and store loyalty intentions for a supermarket retailer. J Retail 74(2):223–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MD, Brynjolfsson E (2001) Consumer decision-making at an Internet shopbot: brand still matters. J Ind Econ 49(4):541–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreng RA, Dixon AL, Olshavsky RW (1993) The impact of perceived value on consumer satisfaction. J Consum Satisf Dissatisfaction Complain Behav 6(1):50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreng RA, MacKenzie SB, Olshavsky RW (1996) A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. J Mark 60(3):15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone RN, Grønhaug K (1993) Perceived risk: further considerations for marketing discipline. Eur J Mark 27(3):39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney JC, Soutar GN, Johnson LW (1999) The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: a study in a retail environment. J Retail 75(1):77–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Thoen W (2001) Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. Int J Electron Commer 5(2):61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Teas RK, Agarwal S (2000) The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers’ perceptions of quality, sacrifices, and value. J Acad Mark Sci 28(2):278–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Mark Sci 4(3):199–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng YM (2005) How can marketing tactics build behavioral loyalty? Bus Rev 3(2):298–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatanasombut B, Igbaria M, Stylianou AC, Rodgers W (2008) Information systems continuance intention of Web-based applications customers: the case of online banking. Inf Manag 45(7):419–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Venetis KA, Ghauri PN (2004) Service quality and customer retention: building long-term relationships. Eur J Mark 38(11/12):1577–1598

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesel P, Zabkar V (2010) Relationship quality evaluation in retailers’ relationships with consumers. Eur J Mark 44(9/10):1334–1365

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira AL, Winklhofer H, Ennew CT (2008) Relationship quality: a literature review and research agenda. J Cust Behav 7(4):269–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh G, Henning-Thurau T, Sassenberg K, Bornemann D (2010) Does relationship quality matter in e-services? A comparison of online and offline retailing. J Retail Consum Serv 17(2):130–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter A, Muller TA, Helfer G, Ritter T (2003) Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality. Ind Mark Manage 32(2):159–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YD, Emurian HH (2005) An overview of online trust: concepts, elements, and implications. Comput Hum Behav 21(1):105–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrington TB, Abgrab NJ, Caldwell HM (2000) Building trust to develop competitive advantage in e-business relationships. Compet Rev 10(2):160–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook RA (1981) Sources of consumer satisfaction with retail outlets. J Retail 57(4):68–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels M, de Ruyter K, van Birgelen M (1998) Marketing service relationships: the role of commitment. J Bus Ind Mark 13(4/5):406–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff RB (1997) Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. J Acad Mark Sci 25(2):139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu SI (2006) A comparison of the behavior of different customer clusters towards Internet bookstores. Inf Manag 43(8):986–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh YH, Choi SM (2011) MINI-lovers, maxi-mouths: an investigation of antecedents to eWOM intention among brand community members. J Mark Commun 17(3):145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen C, Hsu MH, Chang CM (2013) Exploring the online bidder’s repurchase intention: a cost and benefit perspective. Inf Syst E Bus Manage 11:211–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo B, Donthu N (2001) Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an Internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Quart J Electron Commer 2(1):31–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousafzai S, Pallister J, Foxall G (2009) Multi-dimensional role of trust in Internet banking adoption. Serv Ind J 29(5):591–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52(3):2–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Prybutok V, Strutton D (2007) Modeling influences on impulse purchasing behaviors during online marketing transactions. J Mark Theory Pract 15(1):79–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillifro T, Morais DB (2004) Building customer trust and relationship commitment to a nature-based tourism provider: the role of information investments. J Hosp Leis Mark 11(2/3):159–172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, National Dong Hwa University, 1, Sec. 2, Da Hsueh Rd. Shoufeng, Hualien, 97401, Taiwan, ROC

    Wen-Hai Chih

  2. Chihlee Institute of Technology, 1, Wunhua Rd., Banciao District, New Taipei City, 22050, Taiwan, ROC

    Dah-Kwei Liou

  3. Department of Leisure and Recreation Management, Da-Yeh University, No. 168, University Rd., Dacun, Changhua, 51591, Taiwan, ROC

    Li-Chun Hsu

Authors
  1. Wen-Hai Chih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dah-Kwei Liou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li-Chun Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Chun Hsu.

Appendix: Scale items

Appendix: Scale items

Construct/item

Perceived risk (PR)

1. If I used the Web site to purchase I would feel more worried than using other shopping channels.

2. If I used the Web site to purchase I would feel insecure.

3. If I used the Web site to purchase I would feel a lot uncertainty.

Perceived value (PV)

1. Products purchased at this Web site are: (Very poor value for money/Very good value for money).

2. Products purchased at this Web site are considered to be a good buy: (Strongly disagree/Strongly agree).

3. You get what you pay for at this Web site: (Strongly disagree/Strongly agree).

4. Products purchased at this Web site are worth the money paid: (Strongly disagree/Strongly agree).

Cognitive Trust (CT)

1. Even when the Web site information seems questionable, I am confident that the service provider is telling the truth.

2. I think the information provided by this service provider will be proven to be inaccurate. (R)

3. I think this Web site service provider would keep the promises made to me.

4. I know that the information given to me is based on the service provider’s best judgment.

5. I trust this Web site service provider because they seem to be very dependable.

6. I can count on the Web site service provider to be sincere.

Affective trust (AT)

1. In all circumstances, the Web site service provider is ready to offer me assistance and support.

2. When giving advice, the Web site service provider is concerned about my welfare.

3. In the future, I can count on the Web site service provider to consider how the company’s decisions and actions will affect me.

4. I trust this Web site service provider because they seem to care about their customers.

5. When it comes to things that are important to me, I can depend on the support provided by this Web site service provider.

Calculative commitment (CC)

1. I am afraid something will be lost if I stop using this Web site.

2. To stop using this Web site would require considerable personal sacrifice.

3. Some aspects of my life would be affected if I stop using this Web site now.

Affective commitment (AC)

1. I enjoy discussing the good aspects of this Web site with other people.

2. It is easy to become attached to this Web site.

3. This Web site has a great deal of attraction for me.

Satisfaction (SAT)

1. How do you feel about your overall experience of Web site?

2. Very dissatisfied-Very satisfied.

3. Very displeased-Very pleased.

4. Very frustrated-Very contented.

5. Absolutely terrible-Absolutely delighted.

Behavioral intention (BI)

1. I plan to keep using this Web site in the future.

2. I intend to continue using this Web site in the future.

3. I expect my use of this Web site to continue in the future.

Real Purchase Behavior (RPB)

1. I have shopped via this Web site.

2. I often use this Web site.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chih, WH., Liou, DK. & Hsu, LC. From positive and negative cognition perspectives to explore e-shoppers’ real purchase behavior: an application of tricomponent attitude model. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 13, 495–526 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-014-0249-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-014-0249-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation