Skip to main content
Log in

Influence functions of two families of robust estimators under proportional scatter matrices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, under a proportional model, two families of robust estimates for the proportionality constants, the common principal axes and their size are discussed. The first approach is obtained by plugging robust scatter matrices on the maximum likelihood equations for normal data. A projection- pursuit and a modified projection-pursuit approach, adapted to the proportional setting, are also considered. For all families of estimates, partial influence functions are obtained and asymptotic variances are derived from them. The performance of the estimates is compared through a Monte Carlo study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boente G, Orellana L (2001) A robust approach to common principal components. In: Fernholz LT, Morgenthaler S, Stahel W (eds) Statistics in genetics and in the environmental sciences. Birkhäuser Verlag AG , Basel, pp 117–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Boente G, Orellana L (2004) Robust plug-in estimators in proportional scatter models. J Stat Plann Inference 122: 95–110

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boente G, Pires A, Rodrigues I (2002) Influence functions and outlier detection under the common principal components model. Biometrika 89:861–875

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boente G, Critchley F, Orellana L (2004) Influence functions for robust estimators under proportional scatter matrices. http://www.ic.fcen.uba.ar/preprints/boecriore.pdf

  • Boente G, Pires A, Rodrigues I (2006) General projection-pursuit estimators for the common principal components model: influence functions and Monte Carlo study. J Multivariate Anal 97:124–147

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Croux C, Haesbroeck G (2000) Principal component analysis based on robust estimators of the covariance or correlation matrix: influence functions and efficiencies. Biometrika 87:603–618

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Croux C, Ruiz–Gazen A (1996) A fast algorithm for robust principal components based on projection pursuit. In: Prat A (ed) Compstat: proceedings in computational statistics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 211–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Croux C, Ruiz–Gazen A (2005) High breakdown estimators for principal components: the projection-pursuit approach revisited. J multivariate Anal 95:206–226 ((pdf))

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Donoho DL (1982) Breakdown properties of multivariate location estimators. PhD qualifying paper, Harvard University

  • Eriksen PS (1987) Proportionality of covariance matrices. Ann Statist 15:732–748

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Flury B (1984) Common principal components in groups. J Am Stat Assoc. 79:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flury B (1986) Proportionality of k covariance matrices. Stat Probab Lett 4:29–33

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Flury B (1988) Common principal components and related multivariate models. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Flury B, Schmid M (1992) Quadratic discriminant functions with constraints on the covariance matrices: some asymptotic results. J Multivariate Anal 40:244–261

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Flury B, Schmid M, Narayanan A (1994) Error rates in quadratic discrimination with constraints on the covariance matrices. J Classification 11:101–120

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman I, Kim DY, Olkin I (1985) Statistical inference for constants of proportionality. In: Krishnaiah PR (ed) Multivariate analysis–VI. North-Holland, New York, pp 257–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatri CG (1967) Some distribution problems connected with the characteristic roots of \({{\bf S}_1 {\bf S}_2^{-1}}\) . Ann Math Stat 38:944–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DY (1971) Statistical inference for constants of proportionality between covariance matrices. Technical Report 59, Standford University, Department of Statistics, Stanford

  • Manly BF, Rayner JCW (1987) The comparison of sample covariance matrices using likelihood ratio tests. Biometrika 74:841–847

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maronna RA (1976) Robust M-estimators of multivariate location and scatter. Ann Stat 4:51–67

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Novi Inverardi PL, Flury B (1992) Robust estimation of common principal components. Quaderni di Statistica e Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economico–Social 14:49–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen A (1984) A neighborhood-based classifier for landsat data. Canad J of Statist 12:191–200

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pillai KCS, Al–Ani S, Jouris GM (1969) On the distribution of the ratios of the roots of a covariance matrix and Wilks’ criterion for tests of three hypotheses. Ann Math Stat 40:2033–2040

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires AM, Branco J (2002) Partial influence functions. J Multivariate Anal 83:451–468

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (1983) Likelihood tests for relationships between covariance matrices. In: Karlim S, Ameniya T, Goodman LA (eds) Studies in econometrics, time series and multivariate statistics. Academic, New York, pp 529–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahel W (1981) Robust estimation: infinitesimal optimality and covariance matrix estimation. (in German) Thesis, ETH, Zurich

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graciela Boente.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boente, G., Critchley, F. & Orellana, L. Influence functions of two families of robust estimators under proportional scatter matrices. Stat. Meth. & Appl. 15, 295–327 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-006-0029-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-006-0029-1

Keywords

Navigation