Skip to main content
Log in

Emerging OCL tools

  • Regular paper
  • Published:
Software & Systems Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Object Constraint Language (OCL) is a notational language for analysis and design of software systems, which is used in conjunction with the Unified Modelling Language (UML) to specify the semantics of the building blocks precisely. OCL can also be used by other languages, notations, methods and software tools in order to specify restrictions and other expressions of their models. Likewise, OCL is used by the Object Management Group (OMG) in the definition of other fast spreading industrial standards such as Meta Object Facility (MOF) or XML Metadata Interchange (XMI).

Support tools aimed at making this language easier to use are becoming available. These tools are capable of supporting and handling OCL expressions. This paper presents a comparative study of the main tools currently available, both commercial and freely available ones. The study is very practical, with the advantages and disadvantages of the different tools being pointed out. The evaluations made may be of use in helping those developers and analysts who already use the language, as well as those who intend to use it in the near future, to choose the OCL tool which best adapts to their requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Argo/UML. 2001. ArgoUML: The Cognitive CASE Tool. http://www.ArgoUML.com

  2. Catalysis Resource Center. 2000. Catalysis Benefits in Lay Terms. http://www.platinum.com/consult/crc/benefits.htm

  3. Cook, S., Daniels, J.: Designing Object Systems: Object-Oriented Modeling with Syntropy. Prentice Hall, 1994

  4. Cybernetic Intelligence GmbH. OCL Compiler. Version 1.5 for SELECT Enterprise 6.x, 2003. http://www.cybernetic.org

  5. Dresden University of Technology. 2000. OCL Parser. http://dresden-ocl.sourceforge.net/index.html

  6. Fernández, J.L., Toval, A.: Can Intuition Become Rigorous? Foundations for UML Model Verification Tools. Int. Sym. on Sof. Reliability Eng. (ISSRE 2000), IEEE Press, 2000

  7. Galán, F.J., Cañete, J. M., and Toro, M.: Filling the Gap between Specification and Implementation of Software Systems by an executable code Generator of UML/OCL models. Proc. of the XII Int. Conf. of Sof. and Sys. Eng. and their Appl. Paris. Sept., 1999

  8. Gómez, J., Cachero, C., Pastor, O.: Conceptual Modelling of Device-Independent Web Applications. IEEE Multimedia, 2001, pp. 26–39

  9. Gottesdiener, E.: Turning rules into requirements. Application Development Trends, 1999. http://www.adtmag.com/Pub/jul99/fe7029907.asp

  10. Hussmann, H., Demuth, B., Finger, F.: Modular Architecture for a Toolset Supporting OCL. Dresden University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, 2000

  11. IBM. The Object Constraint Language, 1997–2000. http://www-3.ibm.com/software/ad/library/standards/ocl.html

  12. Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction. 2nd. Edition. Prentice Hall, 1997

  13. Moros, B., Nicolás, J., Molina, J. G., Toval, A.: Combining Formal Specifications with Design by Contract. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming JOOP. V. 12, N. 9, 2000

  14. Object by Design. UML Modelling Tools, 2003. www.objectsbydesign.com/tools/umltools_byPlatform.html

  15. Object Management Group, Inc. 1999. UML v. 1.3 specification. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/99-06-08.

  16. Object Management Group, Inc. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Version 1.3, 2000. ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/formal/00-04-03.pdf

  17. Object Management Group, Inc.: XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Version 1.1′′, 2000. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/xmi.htm

  18. Object Management Group, Inc.: UML 1.4 specification, 2001. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/uml.htm

  19. Object Management Group, Inc.: Model Driven Architecture, 2002. http://www.omg.org/mda

  20. Rational Software Corporation et alter.: Object Constraint Language Specification, version 1.3, 2000. http://www.rational.com

  21. Richters, M.: UML-based Specification Environment, 2001. http://www.db.informatik.uni-bremen.de/projects/USE

  22. Richters, M., Gogolla, M.: OCL – Syntax Semantics and Tools. Advances in Object Modelling with the OCL, LNCS, vol. 2263. Springer, Berlin, 2001

  23. SUN Microsystems, Inc. 2002. http://java.sun.com

  24. Toval, A., Fernández, J.L.: Formally Modelling UML and its Evolution: a Holistic Approach. Proc. of Formal Methods for Open Object-Based Distributed Systems (FMOODS 2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000

  25. Toval, A., Fernández, J.L.: Improving System Reliability via Rigorous Software Modeling: The UML Case. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference (Track 10: Software and Computing), Montana, USA, IEEE Computer Society, 2001

  26. Toval, A., Nicolás, J., Moros, B., García, F.: Requirements Reuse for Improving Information Systems Security. Requirements Engineering Journal 6(4): 205–219, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Warmer, J.: OCL Checker, 2000. http://www.klasse.nl/ocl/index.html

  28. Warmer, J., Kleppe, A.: OCL: The Object Constraint Language for the UML. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming JOOP, 12(2): 10–13, 1999

  29. Warmer, J., Kleppe, A.: The Object Constraint Language: Precise Modeling With UML. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ambrosio Toval, Víctor Requena or José Luis Fernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toval, A., Requena, V. & Fernández, J. Emerging OCL tools. Softw Syst Model 2, 248–261 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-003-0031-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-003-0031-0

Keywords

Navigation