Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nesting in Euler Diagrams: syntax, semantics and construction

  • Regular paper
  • Published:
Software & Systems Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the notion of nesting in Euler diagrams, and how nesting affects the interpretation and construction of such diagrams. After setting up the necessary definitions for concrete Euler diagrams (drawn in the plane) and abstract diagrams (having just formal structure), the notion of nestedness is defined at both concrete and abstract levels. The concept of a dual graph is used to give an alternative condition for a drawable abstract Euler diagram to be nested. The natural progression to the diagram semantics is explored and we present a “nested form” for diagram semantics. We describe how this work supports tool-building for diagrams, and how effective we might expect this support to be in terms of the proportion of nested diagrams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biggs, N.: Discrete Mathematics 2nd edition, OUP, 2002

  2. Cayley, A.: On the analytical forms called trees. American Journal of Mathematics 4: 266–268, 1881

  3. Euler, L.: Lettres a Une Princesse d’Allemagne, vol 2. Letters No. 102–108, 1761

  4. Flower, J., Howse, J.: Generating Euler Diagrams. Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, Proc. Diagrams 2002, LNAI 2317. Springer Verlag, 2002, pp. 61–75

  5. Flower, J., Howse, J., Taylor, J.: A framework for modelling with heterogeneous notations. Proc IEEE Symp on Human-Centric computing, 2002, pp. 71–73

  6. Flower, J., Howse, J., Taylor, J.: Nesting in Euler Diagrams. Proc. GT-VMT-02, International Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques, Barcelona, October, 2002, pp. 99–108

  7. Gil, J., Howse, J., Kent, S.: Towards a formalisation of constraint diagrams. Proc IEEE Symp on Human-Centric computing, 2001, pp. 72–79

  8. Harel, D.: On visual formalisms. In: Glasgow, J., Narayan, N.H., Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Diagrammatic Reasoning. MIT Press, 1998, pp. 235–271

  9. Howse, J., Molina, F., Shin, S.J., Taylor, J.: On Diagram tokens and types. Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, Proc. Diagrams 2002, LNAI 2317. Springer Verlag, 2002, pp. 146–160

  10. Object Management Group. UML Specification, Version 1.3: www.omg.org

  11. Visual Modelling Group (VMG) at Brighton home page: www.cmis.brighton.ac.uk/Research/vmg

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Visual Modelling Group, School of Computing, Mathematical and Information Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, U.K.

    Jean Flower, John Howse & John Taylor

Authors
  1. Jean Flower
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Howse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flower, J., Howse, J. & Taylor, J. Nesting in Euler Diagrams: syntax, semantics and construction. Softw Syst Model 3, 55–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-003-0036-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-003-0036-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation