Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Realizing Model Transformation Chain interoperability

  • Theme Section
  • Published:
Software & Systems Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A single Model Transformation Chain (MTC) takes a high-level input model rooted in the problem domain and through one or more transformation steps produces a low-level output model rooted in the solution domain. To build a single “almighty” MTC that is in charge of every design, implementation and specific platform concern is a complex task. Instead, we can use several smaller MTCs that are easier to develop and maintain, because each MTC is independently developed focusing on a specific concern. However, the MTCs must interoperate to produce complete applications; this inherently creates dependencies between them, because each MTC generates a part of the final low-level model. In this paper, we propose an external and explicit mechanism to track dependencies between the MTCs (i.e., the MTCs are oblivious to the mechanism), which is used to automatically derive correspondence relationships between the final models generated by each MTC. The contribution of our mechanism is the reduction of complexity of building interoperable MTCs because the derived correspondences are resolved after the transformations execution, in the solution domain where the semantics of every concept is well-defined. The resolution process consists of (1) checking the consistency between the models, (2) producing communication bridges or (3) guiding the composition of the models. This paper presents three case studies to illustrate the derivation and resolution of correspondence relationships through the MTCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aizenbud-Reshef N., Nolan B.T., Rubin J., Shaham-Gafni Y.: Model traceability. IBM Syst. J. 45(3), 515–526 (2006). doi:10.1147/sj.453.0515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basin D., Doser J., Lodderstedt T.: Model driven security: from uml models to access control infrastructures. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 15(1), 39–91 (2006). doi:10.1145/1125808.1125810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bézivin, J., Bouzitouna, S., Del Fabro, M., Gervais, M.P., Jouault, F., Kolovos, D., Kurtev, I., Paige, R.F.: A canonical scheme for model composition. Model Driven Architect. Found. Appl., pp. 346–360 (2006). doi:10.1007/11787044_26

  4. Cibran, M., D’Hondt, M.: A slice of mde with aop: Transforming high-level business rules to aspects. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on MoDELS/UML (2006). doi:10.1007/11880240_13

  5. Cicchetti A., Di Ruscio D.: Decoupling web application concerns through weaving operations. Sci. Comput. Program. 70(1), 62–86 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.scico.2007.10.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dingel J., Diskin Z., Zito A.: Understanding and improving uml package merge. Softw. Syst. Model. 7(4), 443–467 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10270-007-0073-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fabro M.D.D., Valduriez P.: Towards the efficient development of model transformations using model weaving and matching transformations. Softw. Syst. Model. 8(3), 305–324 (2009). doi:10.1007/s10270-008-0094-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. France, R., Rumpe, B.: Model-driven development of complex software: a research roadmap. FOSE ’07: 2007 Future of Software Engineering (2007). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1253532.1254709

  9. Gasevic, D., Djurić, D., Devedžić, V.: Model driven engineering and ontology development, p. 378 (2009). http://books.google.com/books?id=s-9yu7ubSykC&printsec=frontcover

  10. Goncalves A.: Beginning Java EE 6 Platform with GlassFish 3: From Novice to Professional. The Expert’s Voice in Java Technology. APress, Berkeley (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Group, O.M.: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), infrastructure, v2.1.2. Tech. rep. (2007). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.1.2/Infrastructure/PDF

  12. Hanenberg, S., Stein, D., Unland, R.: From aspect-oriented design to aspect-oriented programs: tool-supported translation of jpdds into code. In: AOSD ’07: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Aspect-oriented Software Development (2007). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1218563.1218570

  13. Jeanneret, C., France, R., Baudry, B.: A reference process for model composition. In: AOM ’08: Proceedings of the 2008 AOSD Workshop on Aspect-oriented Modeling, pp. 1–6. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008). doi:10.1145/1404920.1404921

  14. Jouault, F., Kurtev, I.: On the architectural alignment of atl and qvt. In: SAC ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1188–1195. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2006). doi:10.1145/1141277.1141561

  15. Kienzle, J., Abed, W., Klein, J.: Aspect-oriented multi-view modeling. In: AOSD ’09: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Aspect-oriented Software Development (2009). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1509239.1509252

  16. Kleppe A.G., Warmer J., Bast W.: MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co Inc, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Küster, J., Gschwind, T., Zimmermann, O.: Incremental development of model transformation chains using automated testing. Model Driven Eng. Lang. Syst., pp. 733–747 (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04425-0_60

  18. Linington, P.: Black cats and coloured birds what do viewpoint correspondences do? In: EDOC Conference Workshop, 2007. EDOC ’07. Eleventh International IEEE, pp. 239–246 (2007). doi:10.1109/EDOCW.2007.7

  19. Lodderstedt, T., Basin, D., Doser, J.: Secureuml: A uml-based modeling language for model-driven security. UML 2002—The Unified Modeling Language: 5th International Conference, pp. 426–441. Dresden, Germany, September 30–October 4, 2002. doi:10.1007/3-540-45800-X_33

  20. OMG: Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification Version 2.0 (2006). http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/2006-01-01

  21. Romero, J., Jaén, J., Vallecillo, A.: Realizing correspondences in multi-viewpoint specifications. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on EDOC (2009). http://www.lcc.uma.es/~av/Publicaciones/09/EDOC09.pdf

  22. Romero, J., Jaen, J., Vallecillo, A.: Realizing correspondences in multi-viewpoint specifications. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2009. EDOC ’09. IEEE International, pp. 163–172 (2009). doi:10.1109/EDOC.2009.23

  23. Ruiz-Gonzalez, D., Koch, N., Kroiss, C., Romero, J., Vallecillo, A.: Viewpoint synchronization of uwe models. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Model-Driven Web Engineering (MDWE 2009), pp. 46–60 (2009). http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-455/paper04.pdf

  24. Sandhu, R.S., Coyne, E.J., Feinstein, H.L., Youman, C.E.: Role-based access control models. Computer 29(2), 38–47 (1996). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=485845

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt D.C.: Guest editor’s introduction: model-driven engineering. Computer 39(2), 25–31 (2006). doi:10.1109/MC.2006.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tolvanen, J.P., Kelly, S.: Defining domain-specific modeling languages to automate product derivation: Collected experiences. Software Product Lines pp. 198–209 (2005). doi:10.1007/11554844_22

  27. Vanhooff, B., Baelen, S.V., Hovsepyan, A., Joosen, W., Berbers, Y.: Towards a transformation chain modeling language. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4017, 39 (2006). https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/37137/1/2006-SAMOS2.pdf

  28. Vanhooff, B., Baelen, S.V., Joosen, W., Berbers, Y.: Traceability as input for model transformations. Third ECMDA traceability workshop (2007). https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/146165

  29. von Pilgrim, J., Vanhooff, B., Schulz-Gerlach, I., Berbers, Y.: Constructing and visualizing transformation chains. Model Driven Architect. Found. Appl., pp. 17–32 (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69100-6_2

  30. Yie, A., Casallas, R., Deridder, D., Wagelaar, D.: A practical approach to multi-modeling views composition. Electronic Communications of the EASST 21.In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multi-Paradigm Modeling (MPM 2009), pp. 1–11 (2009). http://journal.ub.tu-berlin.de/index.php/eceasst/article/view/285/284

  31. Yie, A., Casallas, R., Deridder, D., Wagelaar, D.: Deriving correspondence relationships to guide a multi-view heterogeneous composition. Model Driven Eng. Lang. Syst., pp. 225–239 (2010). http://www.springerlink.com/index/p3q0483214643614.pdf

  32. Yie, A., Casallas, R., Wagelaar, D., Deridder, D.: An approach for evolving transformation chains. Model Driven Eng. Lang. Syst., pp. 551–555 (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04425-0_42

  33. Yie, A., Wagelaar, D.: Advanced traceability for atl. In: Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Model Transformation with ATL, pp. 78–87 (2009). http://docatlanmod.emn.fr/MtATL2009Presentations/PreliminaryProceedings.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia

    Andrés Yie & Rubby Casallas

  2. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium

    Dirk Deridder & Dennis Wagelaar

Authors
  1. Andrés Yie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rubby Casallas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dirk Deridder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dennis Wagelaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Yie.

Additional information

Communicated by Tony Clark and Jorn Bettin.

This research was performed in the context of the Caramelos project (VLIR), the VariBru project (ISRIB), and the MoVES project (IAP, Belgian Science Policy).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yie, A., Casallas, R., Deridder, D. et al. Realizing Model Transformation Chain interoperability. Softw Syst Model 11, 55–75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-010-0179-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-010-0179-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation