Skip to main content
Log in

A model for dynamic reconfiguration in service-oriented architectures

  • Special Section Paper
  • Published:
Software & Systems Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of modelling the dynamic characteristics of the architecture of software systems has long been recognised. However, the nature of the dynamics of service-oriented applications goes beyond what is currently addressed by architecture description languages (ADLs). At the heart of the service-oriented approach is the logical separation between the service need and the need-fulfillment mechanism, i.e., the provision of the service: the binding between the requester and the provider is deferred to run time and established at the instance level, i.e., each time the need for the service arises. As a consequence, computation in the context of service-oriented architectures transforms not only the states of the components that implement applications but also the configurations of those applications. In this paper, we present a model for dynamic reconfiguration that is general enough to support the definition of ADLs that are able to address the full dynamics of service-oriented applications. As an instance of the model, we present a simple service-oriented ADL derived from the modelling language srml that we developed in the Sensoria project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abreu J., Bocchi L., Fiadeiro J.L., Lopes A.: Specifying and composing interaction protocols for service-oriented system modelling. In: Derrick, J., Vain, J. (eds) FORTE. LNCS, vol. 4574, pp. 358–373. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abreu J., Mazzanti F., Fiadeiro J.L., Gnesi S.: A model-checking approach for service component architectures. In: Lee, D., Lopes, A., Poetzsch-Heffter, A. (eds) FMOODS/FORTE. LNCS, vol. 5522, pp. 219–224. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, R., Douence, R., Garlan, D.: Specifying and analyzing dynamic software architectures. In: FASE, pp. 21–37 (1998)

  4. Batista T.V., Joolia A., Coulson G.: Managing dynamic reconfiguration in component-based systems. In: Morrison, R., Oquendo, F. (eds) EWSA. LNCS, vol. 3527, pp. 1–17. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bistarelli S., Montanari U., Rossi F.: Semiring-based constraint satisfaction and optimization. J. ACM 44(2), 201–236 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bistarelli S., Santini F.: A nonmonotonic soft concurrent constraint language for SLA negotiation. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci 236, 147–162 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bocchi, L., Fiadeiro, J.L., Gilmore, S., Abreu, J., Solanki, M., Vankayala, V.: A formal approach to modelling time properties of service oriented systems. In: Handbook of Research on Non-Functional Properties for Service-Oriented Systems: Future Directions. Advances in Knowledge Management Book Series. IGI Global (2012, in press)

  8. Bocchi L., Fiadeiro J.L., Lapadula A., Pugliese R., Tiezzi F.: From architectural to behavioural specification of services. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci 253(1), 3–21 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bocchi L., Fiadeiro J.L., Lopes A.: Service-oriented modelling of automotive systems. In: COMPSAC. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1059–1064 (2008)

  10. Bocchi L., Fiadeiro J.L., Lopes A.: A use-case driven approach to formal service-oriented modelling. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds) ISoLA. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 17, pp. 155–169. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bocchi L., Hong Y., Lopes A., Fiadeiro J.L.: From BPEL to SRML: A formal transformational approach. In: Dumas, M., Heckel, R. (eds) WS-FM. LNCS, vol. 4937, pp. 92–107. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boreale M. et al.: SCC: a service centered calculus. In: Bravetti, M., Núñez, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds) WS-FM. LNCS, vol. 4184, pp. 38–57. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Broy, M.: From “formal methods” to system modeling. In: Jones, C.B., Liu, C.B., Woodcock, J. (eds.) Formal Methods and Hybrid Real-Time Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4700, pp. 24–44. Springer, Berlin (2007)

  14. Bruni R., Bucchiarone A., Gnesi S., Hirsch D., Lluch-Lafuente A.: Graph-based design and analysis of dynamic software architectures. In: Degano, P., Nicola, R.D., Meseguer, J. (eds) Concurrency Graphs and Models. LNCS, vol. 5065, pp. 37–56. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruni, R., Lluch-Lafuente, A., Montanari, U., Tuosto, E.: Service oriented architectural design. In: Barthe,G., Fournet, G. (ed.) TGC. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4912, pp. 186–203. Springer, Berlin (2007)

  16. Carbone, M., Honda, K., Yoshida, N.: Structured communication-centred programming for web services. In: De Nicola [18], pp. 2–17

  17. Coulson, G., Blair, G.S., Grace, P., Taïani, F., Joolia, A., Lee, K., Ueyama, J., Sivaharan, T.: A generic component model for building systems software. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 26(1), (2008)

  18. De Nicola, R. (ed): Programming Languages and Systems. LNCS, vol. 4421. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elfatatry A.: Dealing with change: components versus services. Commun. ACM 50(8), 35–39 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fargier, H., Lang, J., Schiex, T.: Mixed constraint satisfaction: a framework for decision problems under incomplete knowledge. In: AAAI/IAAI, vol. 1, pp. 175–180 (1996)

  21. Fiadeiro J.L.: Categories for Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fiadeiro J.L., Lopes A.: A model for dynamic reconfiguration in service-oriented architectures. In: Babar, M.A., Gorton, I. (eds) ECSA. LNCS, vol. 6285, pp. 70–85. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fiadeiro, J.L., Lopes, A., Abreu, J.: A formal model for service-oriented interactions. Sci. Comput. Program (2011, in print)

  24. Fiadeiro J.L., Lopes A., Bocchi L.: An abstract model of service discovery and binding. Formal Asp. Comput. 23(4), 433–463 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fiadeiro, J.L., Lopes, A., Bocchi, L., Abreu, J.: The Sensoria reference modelling language. In: Wirsing and Hölzl [45], pp. 61–114

  26. Garlan D., Cheng S.-W., Huang A.-C., Schmerl B.R., Steenkiste P.: Rainbow: architecture-based self-adaptation with reusable infrastructure. IEEE Comput. 37(10), 46–54 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gilmore S., Hillston J.: The PEPA workbench: a tool to support a process algebra-based approach to performance modelling. In: Haring, G., Kotsis, G. (eds) Computer Performance Evaluation. LNCS, vol. 794, pp. 353–368. Springer, Berlin (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kon F., Costa F.M., Blair G.S., Campbell R.H.: The case for reflective middleware. Commun. ACM 45(6), 33–38 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lapadula, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi F.: A calculus for orchestration of web services. In: De Nicola [18], pp. 33–47

  30. Léger M., Ledoux T., Coupaye T.: Reliable dynamic reconfigurations in a reflective component model. In: Grunske, L., Reussner, R., Plasil, F. (eds) CBSE. LNCS, vol. 6092, pp. 74–92. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lucchi R., Mazzara M.: A π-calculus based semantics for WS-BPEL. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 70(1), 96–118 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Magee, J., Kramer J.: Dynamic structure in software architectures. In: SIGSOFT FSE, pp. 3–14 (1996)

  33. Morrison, R., Kirby, G.N.C., Balasubramaniam, D., Mickan, K., Oquendo, F., Cîmpan, S., Warboys, B., Snowdon, B., Greenwood, R.M.: Support for evolving software architectures in the archware ADL. In: WICSA, pp. 69–78. IEEE Computer Society (2004)

  34. Oquendo F.: π-ADL: an architecture description language based on the higher-order typed pi-calculus for specifying dynamic and mobile software architectures. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 29(3), 1–14 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oquendo F.: Formal approach for the development of business processes in terms of service-oriented architectures using π-ADL. In: Lee, J., Liang, D., Cheng, Y.C. (eds) SOSE, pp. 154–159. IEEE Computer Society, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Oreizy P., Taylor R.N.: On the role of software architectures in runtime system reconfiguration. IEE Proc. Softw. 145(5), 137–145 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. OSOA. Service component architecture: Building systems using a service oriented architecture, 2005. White paper available from http://www.osoa.org

  38. Perry D.E., Wolf A.L.: Foundations for the study of software architecture. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 17(4), 40–52 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Reichel H.: Initial Computability, Algebraic Specifications, and Partial Algebras. Oxford University Press Inc., New York (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Sanz M.L., Qayyum Z., Cuesta C.E., Marcos E., Oquendo F.: Representing service-oriented architectural models using π-ADL. In: Morrison, R., Balasubramaniam, D., Falkner, K.E. (eds) ECSA. LNCS, vol. 5292, pp. 273–280. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Simonot, M., Aponte V.: A declarative formal approach to dynamic reconfiguration. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Open component ecosystems, IWOCE’09, pp. 1–10. ACM, New York, 2009

  42. Tiberghien A., Merle P., Seinturier L.: Specifying self-configurable component-based systems with fractoy. In: Frappier, M., Glässer, U., Khurshid, S., Laleau, R., Reeves, S. (eds) ASM. LNCS, vol. 5977, pp. 91–104. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wermelinger M., Fiadeiro J.L.: A graph transformation approach to software architecture reconfiguration. Sci. Comput. Program. 44(2), 133–155 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Wermelinger, M., Lopes, A., Fiadeiro, J.L.: A graph based architectural (re)configuration language. In: ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE, pp. 21–32 (2001)

  45. Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M. (eds): Rigorous Software Engineering for Service-Oriented Systems. LNCS, vol. 6582. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antónia Lopes.

Additional information

Communicated by Dr. Muhammad Ali Babar, Flavio Oquendo, and Ian Gorton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiadeiro, J.L., Lopes, A. A model for dynamic reconfiguration in service-oriented architectures. Softw Syst Model 12, 349–367 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0236-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0236-1

Keywords

Navigation