Abstract
In this paper, we analyze two mathematical modeling frameworks that reflect different managerial attitudes toward upside risk in the context of R&D portfolio selection. The manager seeks to allocate a development budget between low-risk, low-reward projects, called incremental projects, and high-risk, high-reward projects, called innovational projects. Because of their highly uncertain nature and significant probability of failure, the expected value of the innovational projects is smaller than that of their incremental projects’ counterpart, but the long-term financial health of a company necessitates to take risk in order to maintain growth. We study the differences in strategy and portfolio’s risk profile that arise between a risk-aware manager, who takes upside risk because he has to for the long-term competitive advantage of his company, and a risk-seeking manager, who will take as big a bet as allowed by the model. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to consider upside risk management using a robust-optimization-like methodology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertsimas D, Sim M (2003) Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Math Program 98(1–3):49–71
Brenner MS (1994) Practical R&D project prioritization. Res Technol Manag 37(5):38
Chao R, Kavadias S (2008) A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: when and how to use strategic buckets. Manag Sci 54(5):907–921
Cooper R (2001) Winning at new products, 3rd edn. Perseus Publishing, New York
Cooper R, Edgett S, Kleinschmidt E (1997) Portfolio management for new products. Basic Books, London
Day G (2007) Is it real? Can we win? Is it worth doing? Managing risk and reward in an innovation portfolio. Harv Bus Rev 85(12):110–120
Dickinson M, Thornton A, Graves S (2001) Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Tran Eng Manag 48(4):518–527
Ding M, Eliashberg J (2002) Structuring the new product development pipeline. Manag Sci 48(3):343–363
Ding M, J Eliashberg, Gopalakrishnan A (2014) Innovation and Marketing in the Pharmaceutical Industry. International Series in Quantitative Marketing. Springer, Berlin
Gabrel V, Murat C, Thiele A (2014) Recent advances in robust optimization: an overview. Eur J Oper Res 235:471–483
Kavadias S, Chao R (2007) Resource allocation and new product development portfolio management. In: Handbook of new product development management, Routledge, pp 135–163
Kim W, Mauborgne R (1999) Strategy, value innovation, and the knowledge economy. Sloan Manag Rev
Loch C, Pich M, Terwiesch C, Urbschat M (2001) Selecting R&D projects at BMW: a case study of adopting mathematical programming models. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48(1):70–80
Roussel P, Saad K, Erickson T (1991) Third generation R&D. Harvard Business School Press, Brighton
Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1991) Revolutionizing product development: quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. Simon and Schuster, New York
Wuyts S, Dutta S, Stremersch S (2004) Portfolios of interfirm agreements in technology-intensive markets: consequences for innovation and profitability. J Mark 68(2):88–100
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, S., Thiele, A. A comparison between the robust risk-aware and risk-seeking managers in R&D portfolio management. Comput Manag Sci 14, 197–213 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-016-0271-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-016-0271-4