Skip to main content
Log in

Log-robust portfolio management with parameter ambiguity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a robust optimization approach to portfolio management under uncertainty when randomness is modeled using uncertainty sets for the continuously compounded rates of return, which empirical research argues are the true drivers of uncertainty, but the parameters needed to define the uncertainty sets, such as the drift and standard deviation, are not known precisely. Instead, a finite set of scenarios is available for the input data, obtained either using different time horizons or assumptions in the estimation process. Our objective is to maximize the worst-case portfolio value (over a set of allowable deviations of the uncertain parameters from their nominal values, using the worst-case nominal values among the possible scenarios) at the end of the time horizon in a one-period setting. Short sales are not allowed. We consider both the independent and correlated assets models. For the independent assets case, we derive a convex reformulation, albeit involving functions with singular Hessians. Because this slows computation times, we also provide lower and upper linear approximation problems and devise an algorithm that gives the decision maker a solution within a desired tolerance from optimality. For the correlated assets case, we suggest a tractable heuristic that uses insights derived in the independent assets case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bawa VS, Brown SJ, Klein RW (eds) (1979) Estimation Risk and Optimal Portfolio Choice. North-Holland, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1998) Robust convex optimization. Math Oper Res 23:769–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1999) Robust solutions to uncertain programs. Oper Res Lett 25:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2000) Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math Program 88:411–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Boyd S, Nemirovski A (2006) Extending scope of robust optimization: comprehensive robust counterparts of uncertain problems. Math Program B 107:63–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust optimization. Princeton series in applied mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas D (1999) Nonlinear Programm, 2nd edn. Athena Scientific, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Pachamanova D (2008) Robust multiperiod portfolio management with transaction costs. Comput Oper Res 35(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52(1):35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Brown D, Caramanis C (2011) Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev 53:464–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best M, Grauer R (1991) On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means: some analytical and computational results. Rev Financ Stud 4:315–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81:637–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg R, Gonedes N (1974) A comparison of the stable and student distributions as statistical models for stock prices. J Bus 47:244–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt MW (2010) Portfolio choice problems. In: Handbook of financial econometrics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 269–336

  • Broadie M (1993) Computing efficient frontiers using estimated parameters. Ann Oper Res 45:2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calafiore G, El Ghaoui L, Topcu U (2009) Parameter estimation with expected and residual-at-risk criteria. Syst Control Lett 58:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra V, Ziemba W (1993) The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. J Portf Manag 19:6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cont R (2001) Empirical properties of asset returns—stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant Finance 1:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Ghaoui L, Lebret H (1997) Robust solutions to least-square problems with uncertain data. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 18(4):1035–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Ghaoui L, Oustry F, Lebret H (1998) Robust solutions to uncertain semidefinite programs. SIAM J Optim 9:33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan E, Goldfarb D, Iyengar G (2004) Robust portfolio management. Technical report. Columbia University, New York, NY

  • Fabozzi F, Kolm P, Pachamanova D, Focardi S (2007) Robust portfolio optimization and management. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama E (1965) The behavior of stock prices. J Bus 38:34–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb D, Iyengar G (2003) Robust portfolio selection problems. Math Oper Res 28:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman FO, Hammonds JS (1994) Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. Risk Anal 14(5):707–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull J (2002) Options, futures and other derivatives, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen D, de Vries C (1991) On the frequency of large stock returns: putting booms and busts in perspective. Rev Econ Stat 73(1):18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallberg J, White R, Ziemba WT (1982) Short term financial planning under uncertainty. Manag Sci 28:670–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan R, Zhou G (2007) Optimal portfolio choice with parameter uncertainty. J Financ Quant Anal 42:621–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawas B, Thiele A (2011a) A log-robust optimization approach to portfolio management. OR Spectr 33:207–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawas B, Thiele A (2011b) Short sales in log-robust portfolio management. Eur J Oper Res 215:651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kon S (1984) Models of stock returns—a comparison. J Finance 39:147–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusy M, Ziemba W (1986) A bank asset and liability management model. Oper Res 34(3):356–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud RO (2008) Efficient asset management: a practical guide to stock portfolio optimization and asset allocation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey J, Shetty B (2004) Financial planning via multi-stage stochastic optimization. Comput Oper Res 31:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey J, Vanderbei R, Zenios S (1995) Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Oper Res 43:264–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachamanova D (2006) Handling parameter uncertainty in portfolio risk minimization. J Portf Manag 32(4):70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson M, Smith T (1993) A test for multivariate normality in stock returns. J Bus 66:295–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar R, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2(3):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruszczynski A, Shapiro A (2006) Optimization of risk measures. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sahinidis NV (2004) Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng 28:971–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soyster A (1973) Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res 21:1151–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs RA, Mehrotra S (1999) A branch-and-cut method for 0–1 mixed convex programming. Math Program 86:515–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsitsiklis J, Van Roy B (1999) Optimal stopping of markov processes: Hilbert space theory, approximation algorithms, and an application to pricing high-dimensional financial derivatives. IEEE Trans Autom Control 44:1840–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsitsiklis J, Van Roy B (2001) Regression methods for pricing complex american-style options. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 12:694–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tütüncü R, Koenig M (2004) Robust asset allocation. Ann Oper Res 132:157–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald A (1945) Statistical decision functions which minimize the maximum risk. Ann Math 46:265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenios S (ed) (1996) Financial optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba W, Mulvey J (eds) (1998) Worldwide asset and liability modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurelie Thiele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawas, B., Thiele, A. Log-robust portfolio management with parameter ambiguity. Comput Manag Sci 14, 229–256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-017-0275-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-017-0275-8

Keywords

Navigation