Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Generalized Nash equilibrium problems

  • Invited survey
  • Published:
4OR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Generalized Nash equilibrium problem is an important model that has its roots in the economic sciences but is being fruitfully used in many different fields. In this survey paper we aim at discussing its main properties and solution algorithms, pointing out what could be useful topics for future research in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adida E, Perakis G (2006a) Dynamic pricing and inventory control: uncertainty and competition. Part A: existence of Nash equilibrium. Technical Report, Operations Research Center, Sloan School of Management, MIT

  2. Adida E, Perakis G (2006b) Dynamic pricing and inventory control: uncertainty and competition. Part B: an algorithm for the normalized Nash equilibrium. Technical Report, Operations Research Center, Sloan School of Management, MIT

  3. Altman E and Wynter L (2004). Equilibrium games and pricing in transportation and telecommunication networks. Netw Spat Econ 4: 7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Altman E, Pourtallier O, Haurie A and Moresino F (2000). Approximating Nash equilibria in nonzero-sum games. Int Game Theory Rev 2: 155–172

    Google Scholar 

  5. Antipin AS (2000a). Solution methods for variational inequalities with coupled contraints. Computat Math Math Phys 40: 1239–1254

    Google Scholar 

  6. Antipin AS (2000b). Solving variational inequalities with coupling constraints with the use of differential equations. Differential Equations 36: 1587–1596

    Google Scholar 

  7. Antipin AS (2001). Differential equations for equilibrium problems with coupled constraints. Nonlinear Anal 47: 1833–1844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arrow KJ and Debreu G (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22: 265–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aubin JP (1993). Optima and equilibria. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aubin JP and Frankowska H (1990). Set-valued analysis. Birkhäuser, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  11. Başar T, Olsder GJ (1989) Dynamic noncooperative game theory, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London (reprinted in SIAM Series “Classics in Applied Mathematics”, 1999)

  12. Bassanini A, La Bella A and Nastasi A (2002). Allocation of railroad capacity under competition: a game theoretic approach to track time pricing. In: Gendreau, M and Marcotte, P (eds) Transportation and networks analysis: current trends, pp 1–17. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baye MR, Tian G and Zhou J (1993). Characterization of existence of equilibria in games with discontinuous and non-quasiconcave payoffs. Rev Econ Stud 60: 935–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bensoussan A (1974). Points de Nash dans le cas de fonctionnelles quadratiques et jeux differentiels lineaires a N personnes. SIAM J Control 12: 460–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berridge S, Krawczyk JB (1997) Relaxation algorithms in finding Nash equilibria. Economic working papers archives, http://econwpa.wustl.edu/eprints/comp/papers/9707/9707002.abs

  16. Bertrand J (1883) Review of “Théorie mathématique de la richesse sociale” by Léon Walras and “Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses” by Augustin Cournot. J des Savants 499–508

  17. Breton M, Zaccour G and Zahaf M (2005). A game-theoretic formulation of joint implementation of environmental projects. Eur J Oper Res 168: 221–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavazzuti E and Pacchiarotti N (1986). Convergence of Nash equilibria. Boll UMI 5B: 247–266

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cavazzuti E, Pappalardo M and Passacantando M (2002). Nash equilibria, variational inequalities, and dynamical systems. J Optim Theory Appl 114: 491–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chan D and Pang JS (1982). The generalized quasi-variational inequality problem. Math Oper Res 7: 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  21. Contreras J, Klusch MK and Krawczyk JB (2004). Numerical solution to Nash-Cournot equilibria in coupled constraints electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19: 195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cournot AA (1838). Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses. Hachette, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dafermos S (1990). Exchange price equilibria and variational inequalities. Math Programming 46: 391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Damme E (1996). Stability and perfection of Nash equilibria, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dasgupta P and Maskin E (1986a). The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games, I: theory. Rev Econ Stud 53: 1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dasgupta P and Maskin E (1986b). The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games, II: applications. Rev Econ Stud 53: 27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Debreu G (1952). A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proc Natl Acad Sci 38: 886–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Debreu G (1959). Theory of value. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  29. Debreu G (1970). Economies with a finite set of equilibria. Econometrica 38: 387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dirkse SP and Ferris MC (1995). The PATH solver: a non-monotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems. Optim Methods Softw 5: 123–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ehrenmann A (2004) Equilibrium problems with equilibrium constraints and their application to electricity markets. Ph.D. Dissertation, Judge Institute of Management, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge

  32. Facchinei F, Kanzow C (2007) Globally convergent methods for the generalized Nash equilibrium problem based on exact penalization. Technical Report, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, (in press)

  33. Facchinei F and Pang JS (2003). Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Facchinei F and Pang JS (2006). Exact penalty functions for generalized Nash problems. In: Di Pillo, G and Roma, M (eds) Large-scale nonlinear optimization., pp 115–126. Springer, Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Facchinei F, Fischer A and Piccialli V (2007a). On generalized Nash games and variational inequalities. Oper Res Lett 35: 159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Facchinei F, Fischer A, Piccialli V (2007b) Generalized Nash equilibrium problems and Newton methods. Math Programming (in press); doi: 10.1007/s10107-007-0160-2

  37. Facchinei F, Piccialli V, Sciandrone M (2007c) On a class of generalized Nash equilibrium problems. DIS Technical Report, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, (in press)

  38. Flåm SD (1993). Paths to constrained Nash equilibria. Appl Math Optim 27: 275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Flåm SD (1994). On variational stability in competitive economies. Set Valued Anal 2: 159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Flåm SD, Ruszczyński A (1994) Noncooperative convex games: computing equilibrium by partial regularization. IIASA Working Paper 94-42, Laxenburg

  41. Fudenberg D and Tirole J (1991). Game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fukushima M (2007). A class of gap functions for quasi-variational inequality problems. J Ind Manage Optim 3: 165–171

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fukushima M and Pang JS (2005). Quasi-variational inequalities, generalized Nash equilibria and multi-leader-follower games. Comput Manage Sci 2: 21–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gabriel S, Smeers Y (2006) Complementarity problems in restructured natural gas markets, in Recent Advances in Optimization. Lectures Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 563, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 343–373

  45. Gabriel SA, Kiet S and Zhuang J (2005). A mixed complementarity-based equilibrium model of natural gas markets. Oper Res 53: 799–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Garcia CB and Zangwill WI (1981). Pathways to solutions, fixed points and equilibria. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gürkan G, Pang JS (2006) Approximations of Nash equilibria. Technical Report, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy

  48. Harker PT (1991). Generalized Nash games and quasi-variational inequalities. Eur J Oper Res 54: 81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Harker PT and Hong S (1994). Pricing of track time in railroad operations: an internal market approach. Transport Res B 28: 197–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Haurie A and Krawczyk JB (1997). Optimal charges on river effluent from lumped and distributed sources. Environ Model Assess 2: 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  51. von Heusinger A, Kanzow C (2006) Optimization reformulations of the generalized Nash equilibrium problem using Nikaido–Isoda-type functions. Technical Report, Institute of Mathematics, University of Würzburg, Würzburg

  52. von Heusinger A, Kanzow C (2007) SC1 optimization reformulations of the generalized Nash equilibrium problem. Technical Report, Institute of Mathematics, University of Würzburg, Würzburg

  53. Hobbs B and Pang JS (2007). Nash-Cournot equilibria in electric power markets with piecewise linear demand functions and joint constraints. Oper Res 55: 113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hobbs B, Helman U, Pang JS (2001) Equilibrium market power modeling for large scale power systems. IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. pp 558–563

  55. Hotelling H (1929). Game theory for economic analysis. Econ J 39: 41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hu X, Ralph D (2006) Using EPECs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices. Technical Report CWPE 0619

  57. Ichiishi T (1983). Game theory for economic analysis. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  58. Jiang H (2007). Network capacity management competition, Technical Report. Judge Business School at University of Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jofré A and Wets RJB (2002). Continuity properties of Walras equilibrium points. Ann Oper Res 114: 229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kesselman A, Leonardi S, Bonifaci V (2005) Game-theoretic analysis of internet switching with selfish users. In: Proceedings of the first international workshop on internet and network economics. WINE 2005, Lectures Notes in Computer Science 3828:236–245

  61. Kočvara M and Outrata JV (1995). On a class of quasi-variational inequalities. Optim Methods Softw 5: 275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Krawczyk JB (2000) An open-loop Nash equilibrium in an environmental game with coupled constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2000 symposium of the international society of dynamic games. Adelaide, pp 325–339

  63. Krawczyk JB (2005). Coupled constraint Nash equilibria in environmental games. Resour Energy Econ 27: 157–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Krawczyk JB (2007). Numerical solutions to coupled-constraint (or generalised Nash) equilibrium problems. Comput Manage Sci 4: 183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Krawczyk JB and Uryasev S (2000). Relaxation algorithms to find Nash equilibria with economic applications. Environ Model Assess 5: 63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Laffont J and Laroque G (1976). Existence d’un équilibre général de concurrence imparfait: Une introduction. Econometrica 44: 283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Leyffer S, Munson T (2005) Solving multi-leader-follower games. Argonne National Laboratory Preprint ANL/MCS-P1243-0405, Illinois

  68. Margiocco M, Patrone F and Pusilli Chicco L (1997). A new approach to Tikhonov well-posedness for Nash equilibria. Optimization 40: 385–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Margiocco M, Patrone F and Pusilli Chicco L (1999). Metric characterization of Tikhonov well-posedness in value. J Optim Theory Appl 100: 377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Margiocco M, Patrone F and Pusilli Chicco L (2002). On the Tikhonov well-posedness of concave games and Cournot oligopoly games. J Optim Theory Appl 112: 361–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Morgan J, Scalzo V (2004) Existence of equilibria in discontinuous abstract economies. Preprint 53-2004, Dipartimento di Matematica e Applicazioni R. Caccioppoli

  72. Morgan J, Scalzo V (2007) Variational stability of social Nash equilibria. Int Game Theory Rev 9 (in press)

  73. Munson TS, Facchinei F, Ferris MC, Fischer A and Kanzow C (2001). The semismooth algorithm for large scale complementarity problems. INFORMS J Comput 13: 294–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Myerson RB (1991). Game theory. Analysis of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  75. Nash JF (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc Natl Acad Sci 36: 48–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Nash JF (1951). Non-cooperative games. Ann Math 54: 286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Neumann J (1928). Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele. Math Ann 100: 295–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Morgenstern O and Neumann J (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  79. Nikaido H (1975). Monopolistic competition and effective demand. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  80. Nikaido H and Isoda K (1955). Note on noncooperative convex games. Pac J Math 5: 807–815

    Google Scholar 

  81. Nishimura K and Friedman J (1981). Existence of Nash equilibrium in n person games without quasi-concavity. Int Econ Rev 22: 637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Outrata JV, Kočvara M and Zowe J (1998). Nonsmooth approach to optimization problems with equilibrium constraints. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  83. Pang JS (2002) Computing generalized Nash equilibria. Manuscript

  84. Pang JS and Qi L (1993). Nonsmooth equations: motivation and algorithms. SIAM J Optim 3: 443–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Pang JS and Yao JC (1995). On a generalization of a normal map and equation. SIAM J Control Optim 33: 168–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Pang JS, Scutari G, Facchinei F, Wang C (2007) Distributed power allocation with rate contraints in Gaussian frequency-selective interference channels. DIS Technical Report 05-07, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome

  87. Puerto J, Schöbel A, Schwarze S (2005) The path player game: introduction and equilibria. Preprint 2005-18, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Göttingen

  88. Qi L (1993). Convergence analysis of some algorithms for solving nonsmooth equations. Math Oper Res 18: 227–244

    Google Scholar 

  89. Qi L and Sun J (1993). A nonsmooth version of Newton’s method. Math Programming 58: 353–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Rao SS, Venkayya VB and Khot NS (1988). Game theory approach for the integrated design of structures and controls. AIAA J 26: 463–469

    Google Scholar 

  91. Reny PJ (1999). On the existence of pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibria in discontinuous games. Econometrica 67: 1026–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Robinson SM (1993a). Shadow prices for measures of effectiveness. I. Linear model. Oper Res 41: 518–535

    Google Scholar 

  93. Robinson SM (1993b). Shadow prices for measures of effectiveness. II. General model. Oper Res 41: 536–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Rockafellar RT and Wets RJB (1998). Variational analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  95. Rosen JB (1965). Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave n-person games. Econometrica 33: 520–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Schmit LA (1981). Structural synthesis—its genesis and development. AIAA J 19: 1249–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Scotti SJ (1995) Structural design using equilibrium programming formulations. NASA Technical Memorandum 110175

  98. Stoer J and Bulirsch R (2002). Introduction to numerical analysis, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  99. Sun LJ and Gao ZY (2007). An equilibrium model for urban transit assignment based on game theory. Eur J Oper Res 181: 305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Tian G and Zhou J (1995). Transfer continuities, generalizations of the Weierstrass and maximum theorems: a full characterization. J Math Econ 24: 281–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Tidball M and Zaccour G (2005). An environmental game with coupling constraints. Environ Model Assess 10: 153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Uryasev S and Rubinstein RY (1994). On relaxation algorithms in computation of noncooperative equilibria. IEEE Trans Automatic Control 39: 1263–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Vincent TL (1983). Game theory as a design tool. ASME J Mech Trans Autom Design 105: 165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Vives X (1994). Nash equilibrium with strategic complementarities. J Math Econ 19: 305–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Walras L (1900) Éléments d’économie politique pure. Lausanne

  106. Wei JY and Smeers Y (1999). Spatial oligopolistic electricity models with Cournot generators and regulated transmission prices. Oper Res 47: 102–112

    Google Scholar 

  107. Zhou J, Lam WHK and Heydecker BG (2005). The generalized Nash equilibrium model for oligopolistic transit market with elastic demand. Transport Res B 39: 519–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer and System Sciences “A. Ruberti”, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Via Ariosto 25, 00185, Rome, Italy

    Francisco Facchinei

  2. Institute of Mathematics, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany

    Christian Kanzow

Authors
  1. Francisco Facchinei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Kanzow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Facchinei.

Additional information

The work of Francisco Facchinei has been partially supported by MIUR-PRIN 2005 n.2005017083 Research Program “Innovative Problems and Methods in Nonlinear Optimization”.

The work of Christain Kanzow has been partially supported by the program “Identification, Optimization and Control with Applications in Modern Technologies” of the Elite Network of Bavaria, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Facchinei, F., Kanzow, C. Generalized Nash equilibrium problems. 4OR 5, 173–210 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-007-0054-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-007-0054-4

Keywords

MSC classification (2000)

Search

Navigation