Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lateralised processing of the internal and the external facial features of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces: a visual half-field study

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this visual half field (VHF) experiment, we investigated possible differences between the left and the right hemisphere in the processing of the internal and external features of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Previous studies using famous and unknown faces had indicated that both hemispheres use the same qualitative mode of processing with the internal features being more important for the perception of familiar faces. In this experiment, personally familiar faces rather than famous faces are used. There are several, mainly methodological, reasons why personally familiar faces are more appropriate stimuli to investigate face processing. The results of the present study showed that no overall visual field effect occurred, but more importantly, that face processing in the left hemisphere differed qualitatively from that in the right hemisphere. The theoretical repercussions of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blass EM, Camp CA (2004) The ontogeny of face identity; I. Eight- to 21-week-old infants use internal and external face features in identity. Cognition 92:305–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce V, Young AW (1986) Understanding face recognition. Br J Psychol 77:305–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunas J, Young AW, Ellis AW (1990) Repetition priming from incomplete faces: evidence from part to whole completion. Br J Psychol 81:43–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyer R (1986) Face processing and brain damage: group studies. In: Bruyer R (ed) The neuropsychology of face perception and facial expression. Erlbaum, Hilsdale, pp 63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruyer R, Stroot C (1984) Lateral differences in face processing: task and modality effects. Cortex 20:377–390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R, De Haan EHF (1998) Repetition priming for face speech images: speech-reading primes face identification. Br J Psychol 89:309–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R, Landis T, Regard M (1986) Face recognition and lipreading: a neurological dissociation. Brain 88:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R, Walker J, Baron-Cohen S (1995) The development of differential use of the inner and outer features in familiar face identification. J Exp Child Psychol 59:196–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R, Brooks B, de Haan E, Roberts T (1996) Dissociating face processing skills: decisions about lip-read speech, expression, and identity. Q J Exp Psychol 49A(2):295–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio AR, Damasio H (1986) The anatomical substrate of prosopagnosia. In: Bruyer R (ed) The neuropsychology of face perception and facial expression. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff JB (1982) Studies with non-verbal stimuli. In: Beaumont JG (ed) Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation. Academic, London, pp 29–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies GM, Milne A (1982) Recognizing faces in and out of context. Curr Psychol Res 2:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan EHF (2001) Face perception and recognition. In: Rapp B (ed) The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: what deficits reveal about the human mind. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 75–99

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan EHF (2002) Prosopagnosia. In: Ramachandran (ed) Encyclopedia of the human brain. Elsevier, New York, pp 67–74

  • De Haan EHF, Hay DC (1986) The matching of famous and unknown faces, given either the internal or the external features: a study on patients with unilateral brain lesions. In: Ellis HD, Jeeves MA, Newcombe F, Young AW (eds) Aspects of face processing. Nijhof, Dordrecht, pp 302–309

    Google Scholar 

  • De Renzi E (1986) Prosopagnosia in two patients with CT scan evidence of damage confined to the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 24:385–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietl T, Trautner P, Staedtgen M, Vannuchi M, Mecklinger A, Grunwald T, Clusmann H, Elger CE, Kurthen M (2005) Neuroimage 25:401–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis HD (1983) The role of the right hemisphere in face perception. In: Young AW (ed) Functions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Academic, London, pp 33–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis HD, Shepard JW, Davies GM (1979) Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception 8:431–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hellige JB, Corwin WH, Jonnson JE (1984) Effects of perceptual quality on the processing of human faces presented to the left and the right cerebral hemispheres. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10:90–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hines D, Jordan-Brown L, Juzwin KR (1987) Hemispheric visual processing in face recognition. Brain Cogn 6:91–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kampf M, Babkoff H, Nachson I (2005) Laterality in familiar face recognition: a meta-analysis. Int J Neurosci 115:23–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitterle FL, Kaye RS (1985) Hemispheric symmetry in contrast and orientation sensitivity. Percept Psychophysiol 37:391–396

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Forrest FH (1984) Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces. Mem Cognit 12:60–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landis T, Cummings JL, Christen LC, Bogen JE, Imhof HG (1986) Are unilateral right posterior cerebral lesions sufficient to cause prosopagnosia? Clinical and radiological findings in six additional patients. Cortex 22:243–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leehey SC, Carey S, Diamond R, Cahn A (1978) Upright and inverted faces: the right hemisphere knows the difference. Cortex 14:411–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenluft E, Gobbini MI, Harrison T, Haxby JV (2004) Mothers’ neural activation in response to pictures of their children and other children. Biol Psychiatry 56:225–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy J, Trevarthen C, Sperry RW (1972) Perception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemisphere disconnection. Brain 95:61–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malone DR, Morris HH, Kay MC, Levin HS (1982) Prosopagnosia: a double dissociation between the recognition of familiar and unfamiliar faces. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45:820–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nachson I, Moscovitch M, Umilta C (1995) The contribution of external and internal features to the matching of unfamiliar faces. Psychol Res 58:31–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe F, De Haan EHF, Ross J, Young AW (1989) Face processing, laterality and contrast sensitivity. Neuropsychologia 27:523–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parry FP, Young AW, Saul JSM, Moss A (1991) Dissociable face processing impairments after brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 13:545–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pourtois G, Schwartz S, Seghier ML, Lazeyras F, Vuilleumier P (2005) View-independent coding of face identity in frontal and temporal cortices is modulated by familiarity: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 24:1214–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes G (1985) Lateralized processes in face recognition. Br J Psychol 76:249–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts T, Bruce V (1988) Feature saliency in judging the sex and familiarity of faces. Perception 17:475–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion B, Schiltz C, Crommelinck M (2003) The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform “face areas” discriminate novel from visually familiar faces. Neuroimage 19:877–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent J (1984) An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face recognition. Br J Psychol 75:221–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent J (1985) Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:846–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent J, Bindra D (1981) Differential hemispheric processing of faces: methodological considerations and reinterpretation. Psychol Bull 89:541–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent J, Hellige JB (1986) Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetry. Brain Cogn 5:174–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sieroff E (2001) Feature processing and superiority of three-quarter views in face recognition. Brain Cogn 46:272–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington EK, James M (1967) An experimental investigation of facial recognition in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Cortex 3:317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrington EK, Taylor AM (1978) Two categorical stages of object recognition. Perception 7:695–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young AW (1984) Right cerebral hemisphere superiority for recognizing the internal and external features of famous faces. Br J Psychol 75(2):161–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young AW, Bion PJ (1983) The nature of the sex difference in right hemisphere superiority for face recognition. Cortex 19:215–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young AW, Bruce V (1991) Perceptual categories and the computation of the “grandmother”. Eur J Cogn Psychol 3:5–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young AW, Hay DC, McWeeny KH, Flude BM, Ellis AW (1985) Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception 14:737–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young AW, Hellaway D, Hay D (1987) Configural information in face perception. Perception 16:747–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young AW, Newcombe F, De Haan EHF, Small M, Hay DC (1993) Face perception after brain injury: selective impairments affecting identity and expression. Brain 116:941–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychological Laboratory, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Edward H. F. De Haan & Evelien N. M. van Kollenburg

Authors
  1. Edward H. F. De Haan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evelien N. M. van Kollenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward H. F. De Haan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haan, E.H.F.D., Kollenburg, E.N.M.v. Lateralised processing of the internal and the external facial features of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces: a visual half-field study. Cogn Process 6, 189–195 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-005-0008-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-005-0008-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation