Abstract
Scripts store the temporal order of component events of everyday activities as well as the temporal position of the events within the activity (early or late). When confronted with an activity, predictions are generated about how the component events will unfold. Thereby, an error-detection mechanism continuously monitors whether they unfold as anticipated or not in order to reveal errors in the unfolding activity. We investigated whether the temporal position “early” or “late” influenced the detection of errors using the pupillary response as an index of cognitive resource consumption. An event triplet consisting of three events was presented in a chronological or non-chronological temporal order. Crucially, the triplet focused either on the beginning (temporal position “early”) or the end (temporal position “late”) of an activity. We assumed that these position codes would be used to facilitate error detection when a non-chronological event was presented. Results showed that errors in the temporal order were detected more successfully in early than in late triplets. Results further suggest that strong predictions are formed about how an activity begins. Violations of this prediction must be overcome by zooming into the representation and allocating attention to the temporal position that consumes cognitive resources. Only after zooming in has taken place successfully may the position codes be used to anticipate temporal violations in unfolding event sequences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Barsalou L (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22:577–660
Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Ann Rev Psychol 59:617–645
Barsalou LW (2009) Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philos Transact Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 364(1521):1281–1289
Barsalou LW, Sewell DR (1985) Contrasting the representation of scripts and categories. J Mem Lang 24(6):646–665
Barsalou LW, Santos A, Simmons WK, Wilson CD (2008) Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: de Vega M, Glenberg AM, Graesser AC (eds) Symbols, embodiment, and meaning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 245–284
Beatty J (1982) Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychol Bull 91(2):276–292
Brown G, Kindermann SS, Siegle GJ, Granholm E, Wong EC, Buxton RB (1999) Brain activation and pupil response during covert performance of the stroop color word task. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 5(04):308–319
Collins A, Loftus FF (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev 82(6):407–428
Galambos J, Rips LJ (1982) Memory for routines. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 21(3):260–281
Gilzenrat MS, Nieuwenhuis S, Jepma M, Cohen JD (2010) Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 10(2):252–269
Just MA, Carpenter PA, Miyake A (2003) Neuroindices of cognitive workload: neuroimaging, pupillometric and event-related potential studies of brain work. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 4:56–88
Kosslyn SM (1980) Image and mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Levin DT, Saylor MM (2008) Shining spotlights, zooming lenses, grabbing hands, and pecking chickens: the ebb and flow of attention during events. In: Shipley TF, Zacks JM (eds) Oxford series in visual cognition. Understanding events. From perception to action. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 522–555
Neely JH (1977) Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. J Exp Psychol Gen 106(3):226–254
Nottenburg G, Shoben EJ (1980) Scripts as linear orders. J Exp Soc Psychol 16(4):329–347
Pohl RF (1990) Position effects in chunked linear orders. Psychol Res 52(1):68–75
Raisig S, Welke T, Hagendorf H, van der Meer E (2007) Investigating dimensional organization in scripts using the pupillary response. Psychophysiology 44(6):864–873
Raisig S, Welke T, Hagendorf H, van der Meer E (2009) Insights into knowledge representation: the influence of amodal and perceptual variables on event knowledge retrieval from memory. Cogn Sci 33:1252–1266
Raisig S, Welke T, Hagendorf H, van der Meer E (2010) I spy with my little eye: detection of temporal violations in event sequences and the pupillary response. Int J Psychophysiol 76(1):1–8
Schank RC, Abelson RP (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: inquiry into human knowledge structures. Erlbaum, NJ
Shipley TF, Zacks JM (eds) (2008) Oxford series in visual cognition. Understanding events: from perception to action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Siegle GJ, Ichikawa N, Steinhauer S (2008) Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. Psychophysiology 45(5):679–687
Steinhauer SR, Zubin J (1982) Vulnerability to schizophrenia: information processing in the pupil and event-related potential. In: Usdin E, Hanin I (eds) Biological markers in psychiatry and neurology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 371–385
Zacks JM, Speer NK, Swallow KM, Braver TS, Reynolds JR (2007) Event perception: a mind-brain perspective. Psychol Bull 133(2):273–293
Zimmer K (1984) Ansätze der psychophysiologischen Indikation von Wissensrepräsentation: Die Pupillomotorik als sensbiler Indikator semantischer Informationsverarbeitungsaktivität. In: Klix F (ed) Gedächtnis, Wissen, Wissensnutzung. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaft, Berlin, pp 137–155
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) research grant ME 1362/13-1 awarded to Elke van der Meer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raisig, S., Hagendorf, H. & van der Meer, E. The role of temporal properties on the detection of temporal violations: insights from pupillometry. Cogn Process 13, 83–91 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0413-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0413-0