Abstract
In the literature, politeness has been researched within many disciplines. Although Brown and Levinson’s theory of politeness (1978, 1987) is often cited, it is primarily a linguistic theory and has been criticized for its lack of generalizability to all cultures. Consequently, there is a need for a more comprehensive approach to understand and explain politeness. We suggest applying a social signal framework that considers politeness as a communicative state. By doing so, we aim to unify and explain politeness and its corresponding research and identify further research needed in this area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambadar Z, Cohn JF, Reed LI (2009) All smiles are not created equal: morphology and timing of smiles perceived as amused, polite, and embarrassed/nervous. J Nonverbal Behav 33:17–34
Ambady N, Koo J, Lee F, Rosenthal R (1996) More than words: linguistic and nonlinguistic politeness in two cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:996–1011
Arndt H, Janney RW (1985) Politeness revisited: cross-modal supportive strategies. Int Rev Appl Linguist Lang Teach 23:281–300
Arundale R (2006) Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. J Politeness Res 2:193–216
Brown P, Levinson SC (1978) Universals in language use. In: Goody EN (ed) Questions and politeness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brown P, Levinson SC (1987) Politeness: some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brunet PM, Cowie R (2011) Towards a conceptual framework of research on social signal processing. J Multimodal User Interfaces, Special issue on Conceptual frameworks for Multimodal Social Signal Processing
Brunet PM, McKeown G, Cowie R, Donnan H, Douglas-Cowie E (2009) Social signal processing: what are the relevant variables? And in what ways do they relate. Affect Comput Intell Interact Proc 2:77–82
Chen R (1993) Responding to compliment: a contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. J Pragmat 20:49–75
Cordella M (2007) “No, no, I haven’t been taking it doctor”: noncompliance, face-saving, and face-threatening acts in medical consultations. In: Placencia ME, García C (eds) Research on politeness in the Spanish-speaking world. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah NJ, pp 191–212
Culpeper J (1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. J Pragmat 25:349–367
Eelen G (2001) A critique of politeness theories. St. Jerome, Manchester
Ekman P, Friesen WV, O’Sullivan M (1988) Smiles when lying. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:414–420
Goffman E (1955) On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements of social interaction. Psychiatry J Interpers Process 18:23–231
Goffman E (1967) Interaction ritual: essays in face-to-face behavior. Harper and Row, New York
Graham SL (2007) Disagreeing to agree: conflict (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. J Pragmat 39:742–759
Haugh M (2007) The discursive challenge to politeness theory: an interactional alternative. J Politeness Res 3(2):295–317
Haugh M (2010) When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. J Politeness Res 6:7–31
Janney RW, Arndt H (2005) Intracultural tact versus intercultural tact. In: Watts RJ, Ide S, Ehlich K (eds) Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory, and practice, 2nd edn. Mouton de Gruyter, New York, pp 21–42
Laplante D, Ambady N (2003) On how things are said: voice tone, voice intensity, verbal content, and perceptions of politeness. J Lang Soc Psychol 22:434–441
Locher M, Watts RJ (2005) Politeness theory and relational work. J Politeness Res 1:9–34
Longscope P (1995) The universality of face in Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory a Japanese perspective. Work Pap Educat Linguist 11:69–79
Mao L (1994) Beyond politeness theory: ‘face’ revisited and renewed. J Pragmat 21:451–486
Matsumoto Y (1992) Mimicry or synchrony. The effects of intentionality attributions for nonverbal mirroring behavior. Commun Q 40:69–83
Nakane I (2006) Silence and politeness in intercultural communication in university seminars. J Pragmat 38:1811–1835
Pedlow R, Wales R, Sanson A (2001) Children’s production and comprehension of politeness in requests: relationships to behavioral adjustment in middle childhood. J Lang Soc Psychol March 20:23–60
Sato S (2008) Use of “please” in American and New Zealand English. J Pragmat 40:1249–1278
Schallert DL, Chiang YV, Park Y, Jordan ME, Lee H, Cheng AJ, Chu HR, Lee S, Kim T, Song K (2009) Being polite while fulfilling different discourse functions in online classroom discussions. Comput Educat 53:713–725
Schnurr S, Marra M, Holmes J (2007) Being (im)polite in New Zealand workplaces: Māori and Pākehā leaders. J Pragmat 39:712–729
Spencer-Oatey H, Jiang W (2003) Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: moving from politeness maxims to sociopragmatic interactional principles (SIPs). J Pragmat 35:1633–1650
Tracy K (1990) The many faces of facework. In: Giles H, Robinson WP (eds) Handbook of language and social psychology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 209–226
Trees AR, Manusov V (1998) Managing face concerns in criticism: intergrating nonverbal behaviors as a dimension of politeness in female friendship dyads. Hum Commun Res 24:564–583
Wichmann A (2004) Please: from courtesy to appeal: the role of intonation in the expression of attitudinal meaning. Eng Lang Linguist 9:229–253
Acknowledgments
This research has been supported by the European Community Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013), under grant agreement no. 231287 (SSPNet).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Supplement Issue on “Social Signals. From Theory to Applications,” guest-edited by Isabella Poggi, Francesca D’Errico, and Alessandro Vinciarelli.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brunet, P.M., Cowie, R., Donnan, H. et al. Politeness and social signals. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 2), 447–453 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0418-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0418-8