Skip to main content
Log in

Modal preferences in creative problem solving

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Embodied cognitive science appeals to the idea that cognition depends on the body as well as on the brain. This study looks at whether we are more likely to engage just the brain or enlist the body for complex cognitive functioning such as creative problem solving. Participants were presented with a puzzle based on De Bono’s lateral thinking puzzles. The puzzle consisted of rotating and joining two-dimensional shapes to make a three-dimensional one. In one condition, participants were given the choice of either solving the puzzle mentally or through manipulation of the images on a computer screen. In another condition, the subjects had to solve the puzzle first mentally and then report which mode they would have preferred to solve the puzzle. Two more conditions were applied with slight variations. In all conditions, an overwhelming majority of participants chose to solve the puzzle by manipulation, even though there was not a significant increase on performance. It appeared that participants were making a conscious choice for the body to play a feedback-driven role in creative cognitive processing. This strong preference for manual manipulation over just mental representation, regardless of the impact on performance, would seem to suggest that it is our natural tendency to involve the body in complex cognitive functioning. This would support the theory that cognition may be more than just a neural process, and that it is a dynamic interplay between body, brain and world. The experiential feedback of the body moving through space and time may be an inherently important factor in creative cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bohm D, Peat D (1987) Science, order and creativity. Bantam Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A (1998) Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition. In: Bechtel W, Graham G (eds) A companion to cognitive science. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, pp 506–517

  • Clark A (2008) Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono E (1977) Lateral thinking: a textbook of creativity. Penguin Books, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameroff S (2007) The brain is both neurocomputer and quantum computer. Cogn Sci 31:1035–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loudon GH, Deininger GM, Gordon BS (2012) Play, autonomy and the creative process. The 2nd international conference on design creativity (ICDC2012). Glasgow, UK, 18th–20th September 2012

  • Mayer RE (1999) Fifty years of creativity research. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 169–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe A (2009) Out of our heads: why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. Hill and Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepler DJ (1982) Play and divergent thinking. In: Pepler DJ, Rubin KH (eds) The play of children: current theory and research. Karger, Basel, pp 64–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1995) The construction of preference. Award address May 1995. Am Psychol 50:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan G (2011) Artistic cognition and creativity. In: Biggs M, Karlsson H (eds) The Routledge companion to research in the arts. Routledge, New York, pp 107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen E, Smith LB (1994) A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9:625–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded entirely by ECONA, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gina Deininger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deininger, G., Loudon, G. & Norman, S. Modal preferences in creative problem solving. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 147–150 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0479-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0479-3

Keywords

Navigation