Skip to main content
Log in

The spatial intersection of minds

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial formats of information are ubiquitous in the cognitive and neural sciences. There are neural uses of space in the topographic maps found throughout cortex. There are metaphorical uses of space in cognitive linguistics, physical uses of space in ecological psychology, and mathematical uses of space in dynamical systems theory. These varied informational uses of space each provide a single contiguous medium through which cognitive processes can be shared across subsystems. As we further develop our understanding of how the human mind processes information in real time, the continuous sharing and cascading of information patterns between brain areas can be extended to a sharing and cascading of information between multiple brains and bodies to produce coordinated behavior. Essentially, the way you and the people around you negotiate your shared space affects the way you think, because space is a fundamental part of how you think. It is via space that the mental processes of one mind can form an intersection with the mental processes of another mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballard D, Hayhoe M, Pook P, Rao R (1997) Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behav Brain Sci 20:723–767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou L (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22:577–660

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chemero A (2009) Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker K (1945) On problem solving. Psychol Monogr 58(5, whole no. 270)

  • Grant E, Spivey M (2003) Eye movements and problem solving: guiding attention guides thought. Psychol Sci 14:462–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haken H, Kelso J, Bunz H (1985) A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biol Cybern 51:347–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley S (1998) Vehicles, contents, conceptual structures, and externalism. Analysis 58:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh D (1995) The intelligent use of space. Artif Intell 73:31–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh D, Maglio P (1994) On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn Sci 18:513–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn S, Thompson WG (2006) The case for mental imagery. Oxford University Press, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U (1976) Cognition and reality: principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn Z (1981) The imagery debate: analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychol Rev 88:16–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn Z (2002) Mental imagery: in search of a theory. Behav Brain Sci 25:157–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D, Dale R (2005) Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cogn Sci 29:1045–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D, Spivey M, Edelman S, Naples A (2001). “Language is spatial”: experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. Erlbaum [poster presentation], Mahwah, pp. 845–850

  • Richardson D, Spivey M, Barsalou L, McRae K (2003) Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cogn Sci 27:767–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D, Dale R, Kirkham Z (2007) The art of conversation is coordination. Psychol Sci 18:407–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R, Carello C, Turvey M (1990) Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:227–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2003) Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition 88:B11–B21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Driver J (eds) (2004) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivey MJ (2007) The continuity of mind. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivey M, Richardson D, Gonzalez-Marquez M (2005) On the spatial and image-schematic underpinnings of real-time language processing. In: Zwaan R, Pecher D (eds) Grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 246–281

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swindale N (2001) Cortical cartography: what’s in a map? Curr Biol 11:R764–R767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden G, Holden J (2002) Intentional contents and self-control. Ecol Psychol 14:87–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallentin M, Kristensen L, Olsen J, Nielsen A (2011) Eye movement suppression interferes with construction of object-centered spatial reference frames in working memory. Brain Cogn 77:432–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T (1972) Understanding natural language. Academic Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Spivey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spivey, M.J. The spatial intersection of minds. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 343–346 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0520-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0520-6

Keywords

Navigation