Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of multiphasic prepulses on automatic and attention-modulated prepulse inhibition

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 June 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is widely viewed as an operational measure of sensorimotor gating. Previous research has shown that sensorimotor gating can occur automatically and also can be influenced by selective attention. The present research investigated the relationship of the transient detection response (TDR) with automatic and attention-modulated PPI using a novel “multiphasic” prepulse stimulus. Experiment 1 compared discrete versus multiphasic prepulse types in a no-task PPI protocol to validate multiphasic prepulses as effective elicitors of automatic sensorimotor gating. Results revealed that the two prepulse types elicited equivalent levels of PPI. Experiment 2 compared the effectiveness of continuous monophasic versus continuous multiphasic prepulses within a task-based PPI protocol using a lead interval of 120 ms. Results revealed a significant attention effect for monophasic prepulses only. However, robust PPI was produced by the multiphasic prepulses independent of attention as well as over time. These results suggest that multiple influences on PPI can be assessed concurrently depending on prepulse parameters designed to active the TDR when used in a PPI protocol capable of assessing the effects of selective attention on prepulse processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 14 June 2017

    An erratum to this article has been published.

References

  • Bender S, Schall U, Wolstein J, Grzella I, Zerbin D, Oades RD (1999) A topographic event-related potential follow-up study on “prepulse inhibition” in first and second episode patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 90(1):41–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal TD (1999) Short lead interval startle modification. In: Dawson ME, Schell AM, Bohmelt A (eds) Startle modification: implications for neuroscience, cognitive science and clinical science. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 51–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal TD, Noto JV, Fox MA, Franklin JC (2006) Background noise decreases both prepulse elicitation and inhibition of acoustic startle blink responding. Biol Psychol 72(2):173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braff DL, Light G (2004) Preattentional and attentional cognitive deficits as targets for treating schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology 174:75–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braff DL, Grillon C, Geyer MA (1992) Gating and habituation of the startle reflex in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 49(3):206–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braff DL, Geyer MA, Swerdlow NR (2001) Human studies of prepulse inhibition of startle: normal subjects, patient groups, and pharmacological studies. Psychopharmacology 156(2–3):234–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braff DL, Light GA, Swerdlow NR (2007) Prepulse inhibition and P50 suppression are both deficient but not correlated in schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry 61(10):1204–1207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner CA, Edwards CR, Carroll CA, Kieffaber PD, Hetrick WP (2004) P50 and acoustic startle gating are not related in healthy participants. Psychophysiology 41(5):702–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cranney J, Cohen ME (1985) The glabella startle reflex: inhibition by frequency and intensity modulations. Percept Psychophys 37(1):28–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson ME, Hazlett EA, Filion DL, Nuechterlein KH, Schell AM (1993) Attention and schizophrenia: impaired modulation of the startle reflex. J Abnorm Psychol 102(4):633–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson ME, Schell AM, Hazlett EA, Nuechterlein KH, Filion DL (2000) On the clinical and cognitive meaning of impaired sensorimotor gating in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 96(3):187–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filion DL, Poje AB (2003) Selective and nonselective attention effects on prepulse inhibition of startle: a comparison of task and no-task protocols. Biol Psychol 64(3):283–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filion DL, Dawson ME, Schell AM (1993) Modification of the human startle reflex: a tool for investigating early and late attentional processes. Biol Psychiatry 35(3):185–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filion DL, Dawson ME, Schell AM (1998) The psychological significance of human startle eyeblink modification: a review. Biol Psychol 47(1):1–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flaten MA, Nordmark E, Elden A (2005) Effects of background noise on the human startle reflex and prepulse inhibition. Psychophysiology 42(3):298–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer MA, Braff DL (1987) Startle habituation and sensorimotor gating in schizophrenia and related animal models. Schizophr Bull 13(4):643–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham FK (1975) Presidential Address, 1974. The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation. Psychophysiology 12:238–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham FK (1980) Control of blink reflex excitability. In: Thompson RF, Hicks LH, Shvykov VB (eds) Neural mechanisms of goal-directed behavior and learning. Academic Press, New York, pp 511–519

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham FK (1992) Attention: the heartbeat, the blink, and the brain. In: Campbell BA, Hayne H, Richardson R (eds) Attention and information processing in infants and adults: perspectives from human and animal research. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 3–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawk LW, Yartz AR, Pelham WE, Lock TM (2003) The effects of methylphenidate on prepulse inhibition during attended and ignored prestimuli among boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychopharmacology 165(2):118–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh MH, Swerdlow NR, Braff DL (2006) Effects of background noise and prepulse characteristics on prepulse inhibition and facilitation: implications for neuropsychiatric research. Biol Psychiatry 59(6):555–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ison JR, Zuckerman M, Russo JM (1975) Combination rules for inhibitory stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1(4):318–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp OV, Siddle DAT, Dall PJ (1998) Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses. Psychophysiology 35:452–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp OV, Neuman DL, Pretorius NR, McHugh MJ (2003) Attentional blink modulation during sustained and after discrete lead stimuli presented in three sensory modalities. Psychophysiology 40:285–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh RR, Hoffman HS, Stitt CL, Schwartz GM (1975) The role of small changes in the acoustic environment in modifying the startle reflex. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1(3):235–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meincke U, Morth D, Voss T, Thelen B, Geyer MA, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E (2004) Prepulse inhibition of the acoustically evoked startle reflex in patients with an acute schizophrenic psychosis: a longitudinal study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 254(6):415–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlstein WM, Fiorito E, Simons RF, Graham FK (1993) Lead stimulation effects on reflex blink, exogenous brain potentials, and loudness judgments. Psychophysiology 30:347–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poje AB, Filion DL, Heater J (2004) The effects of discrete prepulse format and background noise on attentional modification of prepulse inhibition of startle. In: Psychophysiology, 44th Annual meeting of the Society-for-Psychophysiological-Research, vol 41

  • Schell AM, Wynn JK, Dawson ME, Sinaii N, Niebala CB (2000) Automatic and controlled attentional processes in startle eyeblink modulation: effects of habituation of the prepulse. Psychophysiology 37:409–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne GL, Dawson ME, Schell AM (2005) Attention and prepulse inhibition: the effects of task-relevant, irrelevant and no-task conditions. Int J Psychophysiol 56(2):121–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn JK, Dawson ME, Schell AM (2000) Discrete and continuous prepulses have differential effects on startle prepulse inhibition and skin conductance orienting. Psychophysiology 37(2):224–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert B. Poje.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0823-8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poje, A.B., Filion, D.L. The effects of multiphasic prepulses on automatic and attention-modulated prepulse inhibition. Cogn Process 18, 261–270 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0808-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0808-7

Keywords

Navigation