Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Distributed Approach for Coordination of Traffic Signal Agents

  • Published:
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Innovative control strategies are needed to cope with the increasing urban traffic chaos. In most cases, the currently used strategies are based on a central traffic-responsive control system which can be demanding to implement and maintain. Therefore, a functional and spatial decentralization is desired. For this purpose, distributed artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems have come out with a series of techniques which allow coordination and cooperation. However, in many cases these are reached by means of communication and centrally controlled coordination processes, giving little room for decentralized management. Consequently, there is a lack of decision-support tools at managerial level (traffic control centers) capable of dealing with decentralized policies of control and actually profiting from them. In the present work a coordination concept is used, which overcomes some disadvantages of the existing methods. This concept makes use of techniques of evolutionary game theory: intersections in an arterial are modeled as individually-motivated agents or players taking part in a dynamic process in which not only their own local goals but also a global one has to be taken into account. The role of the traffic manager is facilitated since s/he has to deal only with tactical ones, leaving the operational issues to the agents. Thus the system ultimately provides support for the traffic manager to decide on traffic control policies. Some application in traffic scenarios are discussed in order to evaluate the feasibility of transferring the responsibility of traffic signal coordination to agents. The results show different performances of the decentralized coordination process in different scenarios (e.g. the flow of vehicles is nearly equal in both opposing directions, one direction has a clearly higher flow, etc.). Therefore, the task of the manager is facilitate once s/he recognizes the scenario and acts accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Allsop, and J. Charlesworth “Traffic in a signal controller network: an example of different signal timings inducing different routing,”. Traffic Eng. and Control, vol. 18, pp. 262–264, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. L. C. Bazzan, “A game-theoretic approach to distributed control of traffic signals,”. in Proceedings of the First Int. Conf. on Multi–Agent Systems (ICMAS) San Francisco. extended abstract, 1995.

  3. A. L. C. Bazzan, “Evolution of coordination as a metaphor for learning in multi–agent systems,” in G. Weiss (ed.), DAI Meets Machine Learning, no.1221 in LNAI. Springer–Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 117–136, 1997a.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. L. C. Bazzan, “An evolutionary game–theoretic approach for coordination of traffic signal agents,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Karlsruhe, 1997b.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. L. C. Bazzan, J. Wahle, and F. Klu¨ gl, “Agents in traffic modelling–from Reactive to Social Behaviour,” in Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin/Heidelberg. Also appeared as Proc. of the U.K. Special Interest Group on Multi-Agent Systems (UKMAS), Bristol, UK, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Busch, and G. Kruse, “MOTION–Ein neues Verfahren fu¨ r die sta¨ dtische Lichtsignalsteurung und seine Erprobung in Rahmen des EG–Programms ATT,” in Heureka 93, pp. 79–93, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Cammarata, D. McArthur, and R. Steeb, “Strategies of cooperation in distributed problem solving,” in Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Karlsruhe, F. R. of Germany, 1983, pp. 767–770.

  8. E. C. P., Chang, J. C. K. Lei, and C. J. Messer, “Arterial signal timing optimization using PASSER–II.” Technical Report 467, Texas Transportation Institute, 1988. BAZZAN 162

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. L. Cohen, and J. D. C. Little, “The MAXBAND program for arterial timing plans,” Public Roads, vol. 46, no.2, pp. 61–65, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Cuena, G. Ambrosino, and M. Boero, “A general knowledge–based architecture for traffic control: the KITS approach,” in Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Transportation Engineering,. California, 1992.

  11. M. Di Taranto, “UTOPIA, in Proceedings of the IFAC-IFIP-IFORS Conference on Control, Computers, Communication in Transportation. Paris, 1989.

  12. S. Elhadouaj, A. Drogoul, and S. Espie’,“How to combine reactivity and anticipation: the case of conflicts resolution in a simulated road traffic,” in Proceedings of the Multiagent Based Simulation (MABS), 2000.

  13. N. Findler, and J. Stapp, “Distributed approach to optimized control of street traffic signals,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 118, no.1, pp. 99–110, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Fischer, N. Kuhn, H. Mu¨ ller, J. Mu¨ ller, M. Pischel, and A. Schroth, “Verteiltes Problemlo¨ sen in Transportwesen,” Information Management, vol. 2, pp. 32–40, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Fischer, J. Mu¨ ller, M. Pischeland, and D. Schier, “A model for cooperative transportation scheduling,”in V. Lesser (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi–Agent Systems (ICMAS),1995, pp. 109–116.

  16. B. Foraste, and G. Scemana, “Surveillance and congested traffic control in Paris by expert system,” in IEEE Int. Conf. on Road Traffic Control, London, pp. 91–94, 1986.

  17. D. Fudenberg, and D. Levine, “Steady state learning and nash equilibrium,” Econometrica, vol. 61, pp. 547–573, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Garland, and R. Alterman, 2004, “Autonomous agents that learn to better coordinate,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 8, no.3, 267–301, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Gartner, “OPAC–A demand–responsive strategy for traffic signal control,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 906, pp. 75–81, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. R., Genesereth, M. L. Ginsberg, and J. S. Rosenschein, “Cooperation without communication,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Nat. Conf. on Art. Intelligence, 1986.

  21. J. Halpern, and Y. Moses, “Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment,” in Third Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Vancouver, 1984.

  22. C. B. Harley, “Learning the evolutionary stable strategy,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 89, pp. 611–631, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Haugeneder and D. Steiner, “MECCA/UTS: A multi-agent scenario for cooperation in urban traffic’. in Proceeedings of the Special Interest Group on Cooperating Knowledge Based Systems, 1993.

  24. J. Henry, J. Farges, and J. Tuffal, “The PRODYN real time traffic algorithm,” in Proceedings of the Int. Fed. of Aut. Control (IFAC) Conf, Baden-Baden, 1983.

  25. F. Klu¨ gl, and A. L. C. Bazzan, “Simulation of adaptive agents learning heuristics for route choice in a commuter scenario,” in Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), vol. 1. Bologna, Italy, extended abstract, pp. 217–218, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Klu¨ gl, and A. L. C. Bazzan, 2004,“Route decision behaviour in a commuting scenario,”Journal of Artificial Societies an Social Simulation, vol. 7, no.1, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/1/1.html.

  27. F. Klu¨ gl, A. L. C. Bazzan, and J. Wahle, “Selection of information types based on personal utility-a testbed for traffic information markets,” in Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Melbourne, Australia, 2003, pp. 377–384.

  28. W. Leutzbach, Introduction to the Theory of Traffic Flow. Springer, Berlin, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. List, and J. Pond, “A strategy for real-time control demand-sensitive signal networks,” in Advanced Air Transportation Technologies (AATT) Conference, 1989.

  30. M. W. Macy, and A. Flache, “Learning dynamics in social dilemmas,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 99, pp. 7229–7236, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Maynard-Smith, and G. R. Price, “The logic of animal conflict,” Nature, vol. 246, pp. 15–18, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Morgan, and J. Little, “Synchronizing traffic signals for maximal bandwidth,” Operations Research, vol. 12, pp. 897–912,1964.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Ossowski, Co-ordination in artifical agent societies, social structures and its implications for autonomous problem-solving agents., no.1535 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. Paruchuri, A. R. Pullalarevu, and K. Karlapalem, “Multi agent simulation of unorganized traffic,” in Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Bologna, Italy, 2002, vol. 1. pp. 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Robertson, “TRANSYT: A traffic network study tool,” Rep. LR 253, Road Res. Lab., London, 1969.

  36. J. Rosenschein, and M. Genesereth, “Deals among rational agents,” in Proceedings Nineth Int. Joint Conf. on Art. Intelligence,. 1985, pp. 91–99.

  37. R. Rossetti, R. Liu, D. Van Vliet, S. Bampi, and H. Cybis, “Applying an agent–based approach to traffic modeling,” in Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation (at Autonomous Agents), Barcelona, 2000a.

  38. R. Rossetti, R. Liu, D. Van Vliet, and H. Cybis, “An agent–based framework for the assessment of drivers’ decision–making,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, Dearborn (MI), USA, 2000b.

  39. R. J. F. Rossetti, R. H. Bordini, A. L. C. Bazzan, S. Bampi, R. Liu, and D. Van Vliet, “Using BDI agents to improve driver modelling in a commuter scenario,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 10, 5–6, pp. 47–72, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. E. Roth, and I. Erev, “Learning in extensive form games: experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term,” Games Econ. Behav, vol. 8, pp. 164–212,1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. A. Schaerf, Y. Shoham, and M. Tennenholtz, “Adaptive balancing load: A study in multi-agent learning,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 2, pp. 475–500,1995.

    Google Scholar 

  42. H. Strobel, Computer Controlled Urban Transportation. A Survey of Concepts, Methods and International Experiences, vol. 10 of IIASA Int. Series, John Wiley and Sons, 1982.

  43. TRANSYT-7F, “TRANSYT-7F user’s manual,” Transportation Research Center, University of Florida, 1988.

  44. F. Vanderborght, “PRODYN in Brussels,” in Traffic Technology International, Surrey, UK: International Press, 1995.

  45. J. Wahle, A. L. C. Bazzan, F. Klu¨ gl, and M. Schreckenberg, “The impact of real time information in a two route scenario using agent based simulation,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 10, 5–6, pp. 73–91, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  46. B. Wild, “SAPPORO–Toward an intelligent traffic management system,” in Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Transportation Engineering, California, 1992.

  47. C. Zozaya-Goristiza, and C. Hendrickson, “Expert systems for traffic signal setting assistance,” Journal of Transport. Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 113, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Informática, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, CP 15064, Porto Alegre, RS 91.501-970, Brazil

    Ana L. C. Bazzan

Authors
  1. Ana L. C. Bazzan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bazzan, A.L.C. A Distributed Approach for Coordination of Traffic Signal Agents. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 10, 131–164 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-004-6975-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-004-6975-9

Search

Navigation