Skip to main content
Log in

Sarcasm, Deception, and Stating the Obvious: Planning Dialogue without Speech Acts

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an alternative to the ‘speech acts with STRIPS’ approach to implementing dialogue a fully implemented AI planner which generates and analyses the semantics of utterances using a single linguistic act for all contexts. Using this act, the planner can model problematic conversational situations, including felicitous and infelicitous instances of bluffing, lying, sarcasm, and stating the obvious. The act has negligible effects, and its precondition can always be proved. ‘Speaker maxims’ enable the speaker to plan to deceive, as well as to generate implicatures, while ‘hearer maxims’ enable the hearer to recognise deceptions, and interpret implicatures. The planner proceeds by achieving parts of the constructive proof of a goal. It incorporates an epistemic theorem prover, which embodies a deduction model of belief, and a constructive logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. F. Allen C. R. Perrault (1980) ArticleTitleAnalyzing Intention in Utterances Artificial Intelligence 15 143–178

    Google Scholar 

  • D. E. Appelt (1985) ArticleTitlePlanning English Referring Expressions Artificial Intelligence 26 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Austin (1962) How to Do Things with Words 2nd edn OUP Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. L. Furst, M. L. (1997). Fast Planning Through Planning Graph Analysis. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 1995, 1636–1642. Also in Artificial Intelligence 90: 281–300.

  • Bonet, B. Geffner, H. (2000). HSP: Heuristic Search Planner. AI Magazine 21(2): Entry at the AIPS-98 Planning Competition, Pittsburgh 6/98.

  • B. C. Bruce (1975) Generation as a Social Action. B. L. Nash-Webber R. C. Schank (Eds) Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing Ass. for Computational Linguistics Cambridge, MA 74–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt H (2000) Dialogue and Context Specification In: Bunt H, Black W (eds) Abduction Belief and Context in Dialogue Studies in Computational Pragmatics Philadelphia PA, John Benjamins pp 81–150

  • P. R. Cohen H. J. Levesque (1990) Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication P.R. Cohen J Morgan M. E. Pollack (Eds) Intentions in Communication MIT Cambridge, MA 221–255

    Google Scholar 

  • P. R. Cohen C.R. Perrault (1979) ArticleTitleElements of a Plan-based Theory of Speech Acts Cognitive Science 3 177–212

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Fikes N. J. Nilsson (1971) ArticleTitleSTRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving Artificial Intelligence 2 189–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen G. (1935) Investigation into Logical Deduction In: Szabo ME (ed) The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen 68–131. North-Holland, 1969. Originally published as Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen, Mathematische Zeitschrift 39: 176–210 and 405–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Green (1969) ArticleTitleApplication of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving Proc 1st IJCAI 12 IssueID␣ 219–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Cole, P. Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.

  • B. J. Grosz C.L. Sidner (1990) Plans for Discourse P. R. Cohen J. Morgan M. E. Pollack (Eds) Intentions in Communication MIT Cambridge MA 416–444

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Heyting (1956) Intuitionism: An Introduction Amsterdam North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Heyting (1975) Brouwer Collected Works (I) Amsterdam North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hintikka (1962) Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Two Notions Cornell University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hoffmann B. Nebel (2001) ArticleTitleThe FF Planning System: Fast Plan Generation Through Heuristic Search Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14 253–302

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Konolige (1986) A Deduction Model of Belief Pitman. London

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kripke (1963) ArticleTitleSemantical Considerations on Modal Logic Acta. Philosophica. Fennica. 16 83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1979) ArticleTitleScorekeeping in a Language Game Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 339–359

    Google Scholar 

  • J. McCarthy P. J. Hayes (1969) ArticleTitleSome Philosophical Problems From the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence Machine Intelligence 4 463–502

    Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Moore (1985) A Formal Theory of Knowledge and Action J. R. Hobbs R. C. Moore (Eds) Formal Theories of the Common Sense World Ablex Norwood, NJ 319–358

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Newell H. A. Simon (1963) GPS, A Program that Simulates Human Thought E. A. Feigenbaum J. Feldman (Eds) Computers and Thought McGraw-Hill New York 279–293

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Newell J. C. Shaw H. A. Simon (1957) ArticleTitleEmpirical Explorations with the Logic Theory Machine Proceedings of the Western Joint Computer Conference 15 218–239

    Google Scholar 

  • X. Nguyen S. Kambhampati (2001) ArticleTitleReviving Partial Order Planning Proc. IJCAI 459–466

    Google Scholar 

  • M. E. Pollack (1990) Plans as Complex Mental Attitudes P. R. Cohen J. Morgan M. E. Pollack (Eds) Intentions in Communication MIT Cambridge, MA 77–103

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Ramsay (2000) Speech Act Theory and Epistemic Planning H. Bunt W. Black (Eds) Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics John Benjamins Philadelphia, PA 293–310

    Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Searle (1965) What is a Speech Act? M. Black (Eds) Philosophy in America, Allen and Unwin ␣ 221–239

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Stalnaker (1972) ArticleTitlePragmatics Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86 153–171

    Google Scholar 

  • R. H. Thomason (1990) Accommodation, Meaning, and Implicature: Interdisciplinary Foundations for Pragmatics P. R. Cohen J. Morgan M. E. Pollack (Eds) Intentions in Communication MIT Cambridge, MA 325–363

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Debora Field or Allan Ramsay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Field, D., Ramsay, A. Sarcasm, Deception, and Stating the Obvious: Planning Dialogue without Speech Acts. Artif Intell Rev 22, 149–171 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-004-4307-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-004-4307-8

Keywords

Navigation