Skip to main content
Log in

On-the-fly repair of structural and lexical ontology mismatches in multi-agent systems

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a Semantic-Web-like multi-agent environment, ontology mismatch is inevitable: we can’t realistically expect agents created at different times and places by different people to commit to one unchanging universal ontology. Ontology matching seems to be the only solution to such a problem. However, standard techniques for aligning heterogeneous ontologies are based on time-consuming, off-line and often semi-automated processes and pre-suppose full access to the interacting agents’ ontologies. This is far from ideal in situations where agents meet for the first time, interact quickly and have restricted access to other agents’ private information. In this paper we present the Ontology Repair System (ORS), which attempts to match fully-fledged first-order ontologies automatically using incomplete information. Particular emphasis is laid on its semantic matching module, the Semantic Matcher, which provides a solution for lexical mismatches, which are the most common and the most challenging to address. ORS and the Semantic Matcher have been implemented and evaluated, with very promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carnap R (1947) Meaning and necessity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frege G (1892) On sense and reference. In: Ludlow P (ed) Readings in the philosophy of language. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik. Cambridge, 1997, pp 563–583

  • García-Silva A, Corcho O, Alani H, Gómez-Pérez A (2012) Review of the state of the art: discovering and associating semantics to tags in folksonomies. Knowl Eng Rev 27(01):57–85. doi:10.1017/S026988891100018X, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026988891100018X

  • Giunchiglia F, Shvaiko P (2003) Semantic matching. Knowl Eng Rev 18: 265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin H (2009) Social meaning on the web: from Wittgenstein to search engines. In: Proceedings of the WebSci’09: society on-line

  • Halpin H, Lavrenko V (2010) A generative model of tagging, search and social networks. In: Proceedings of the WebSci10: extending the frontiers of society on-line, 26–27 April, 2010, Raleigh, NC, USA

  • Kripke S (1972) Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence S, Margolis E (1999) Concepts and cognitive science. In: Margolis E, Laurence S (eds.) Concepts: core readings. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 2–81

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill F, Bundy A (2007) Dynamic, automatic, first-order ontology repair by diagnosis of failed plan execution. IJSWIS 3: 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller G, Beckwith R, Fellbaum C, Gross D, Miller K (2005) Introduction to wordnet: an on-line lexical database. Online at http://courses.media.mit.edu/2002fall/mas962/MAS962/miller.pdf

  • Niles I, Pease A (2003) Linking lexicons and ontologies: mapping wordnet to the suggested upper merged ontology. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on information and knowledge engineering (IKE 03), Las Vegas

  • Ogden CK, Richards IA (1923) The meaning of meaning. Harcourt, Brace & World Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu W, Hu W, Chen G (2006) Constructing virtual documents for ontology matching. In: Proceedings of the 15th international world wide web conference, Edinburgh, pp 23–31

  • Robertson S, Jones KS (1976) Relevance weighting of search terms. J Am Soc Inf Sci 27: 129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salton G, Wong A, Yang CS (1975) A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun ACM 18: 613–620

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shvaiko P, Euzenat J (2012) Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng

  • Vander-Wal T (2005) Explaining and showing broad and norrow folksonomies. Blog post, online at http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1635

  • Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. 2001

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona McNeill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Togia, T., McNeill, F. On-the-fly repair of structural and lexical ontology mismatches in multi-agent systems. Artif Intell Rev 40, 175–191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9352-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9352-0

Keywords

Navigation