Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Buried pipe localization using an iterative geometric clustering on GPR data

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ground penetrating radar is a non-destructive method to scan the shallow subsurface for detecting buried objects like pipes, cables, ducts and sewers. Such buried objects cause hyperbola shaped reflections in the radargram images achieved by GPR. Originally, those radargram images were interpreted manually by human experts in an expensive and time consuming process. For an acceleration of this process an automatization of the radargram interpretation is desirable. In this paper an efficient approach for hyperbola recognition and pipe localization in radargrams is presented. The core of our approach is an iterative directed shape-based clustering algorithm combined with a sweep line algorithm using geometrical background knowledge. Different to recent state of the art methods, our algorithm is able to ignore background noise and to recognize multiple intersecting or nearby hyperbolas in radargram images without prior knowledge about the number of hyperbolas or buried pipes. The whole approach is able to deliver pipe position estimates with an error of only a few millimeters, as shown in the experiments with two different data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abubakar A, van den Berg PM (2002) The contrast source inversion method for location and shape reconstructions. Inverse Prob 18(2)

  • Ahn SJ, Rauh W, Warnecke HW (2001) Least-squares orthogonal distances fitting of circle, sphere, ellipse, hyperbola, and parabola. Pattern Recognit 34(12):2283–2303

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Nuaimy W, Huang Y, Nakhkash M, Fang MTC, Nguyen VT, Eriksen A (2000) Automatic detection of buried utilities and solid objects with GPR using neural networks and pattern recognition. J Appl Geophys 43:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barinova O, Lempitsky V, Kohli P (2010) On the detection of multiple object instances using hough transforms. In: IEEE conference on CVPR

  • Birkenfeld S (2010) Automatic detection of reflexion hyperbolas in GPR data with neural networks. In: World automation congress (WAC), pp 1–6

  • Boissonnat JD, Yvinec M (1998) Algorithmic geometry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Busche A, Janning R, Horvath T, Schmidt-Thieme L (2012) Some improvements for multi-hyperbola detection on GPR Data. In: Workshop on KDML at LWA

  • Capineri L, Grande P, Temple JAG (1998) Advanced image-processing technique for real-time interpretation of ground-penetrating radar images. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 9:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Cohn AG (2010a) Probabilistic conic mixture model and its applications to mining spatial ground penetrating radar data. In: Workshops in SIAM conference on data mining (SDM10)

  • Chen H, Cohn AG (2010b) Probabilistic robust hyperbola mixture model for interpreting ground penetrating radar data. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (WCCI’10), Barcelona

  • Cui Y, Wang L, Xiao J (2010) Automatic feature recognition for gpr image processing. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 61:176–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos VRN, Porsani JL, Hirata NST (2010) Automatic classification of metallic targets using pattern recognition of GPR reflection: a study in the IAG-USP Test Site, Sao Paulo (Brazil). In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on ground penetrating radar (GPR), pp 322–325

  • Ester M, Kriegel H, Sander J, Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD-96)

  • Giannopoulos A (2005) Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax. Constr Build Mater 19(10):755–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janning R, Horváth T, Busche A, Schmidt-Thieme L (2012a) GamRec: a clustering method using geometrical background knowledge for GPR data preprocessing. In: Artificial intelligence applications and innovations (IFIP advances in information and communication technology 381). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 347–356

  • Janning R, Horváth T, Busche A, Schmidt-Thieme L (2012b) Pipe localization by apex detection. In: Proceedings of the IET international conference on radar systems (Radar 2012). Glasgow, Scotland

  • Naser M, Junge A (2010) Influence of pipe filling, geometry and antenna polarisation on GPR measurements. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on ground penetrating radar (GPR), pp 1–6

  • O’Leary P, Zsombor-Murray PZ (2004) Direct and specific least-square fitting of hyperbolæ and ellipses. Journal of Electronic Imaging 13:492–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasolli E, Melgani F, Donelli M (2009) Automatic analysis of GPR images: a pattern-recognition approach. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47(7):2206–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristic AV, Petrovacki D, Govedarica M (2009) A new method to simultaneously estimate the radius of a cylindrical object and the wave propagation velocity from GPR data. Comput Geosci 35:1620–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao W, Bouzerdoum A, Phung SL, Su L, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2010) Automatic classification of GPR signals. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on ground penetrating radar (GPR), pp 738–743

  • Shihab S, Al-Nuaimy W (2005) Radius estimation for cylindrical objects detected by ground penetrating radar. Sens Imaging Int J 6:151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Simi A, Bracciali S, Manacorda G (2008) Hough transform based automatic pipe detection for array GPR: algorithm development and on-site tests. In: Radar conference RADAR ’08. Rome

  • Sugihartono NRH, Suksmono AB (2009) Interpretation target pattern of a buried basic object on surface ground penetrating radar system. Int J Electr Eng Inform 1:496–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor CG, Falorni P, Capineri L (2004) Classification of buried objects from series of aligned hyperbolic arcs or ”pendants” in radar scans: estimating a buried pipe diameter. In: Progress in electromagnetics research symposium, Pisa, Italy, pp 607–610

  • Windsor CG, Capineri L, Falorni P (2005) The estimation of buried pipe diameters by generalized hough transform of radar data. In: Progress in electromagnetics research symposium. Hangzhou, China, pp 345–349

  • Yaman F (2009) Location and shape reconstructions of sound-soft obstacles buried in penetrable cylinders. Inverse Prob 25(6)

  • Yu J, Kulkarni SR, Poor HV (2012) Robust ellipse and spheroid fitting. Pattern Recognit Lett 33(5):492–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Wu J, Xie X, Chen J, Ge S (2010) Multiple suppression in GPR image for testing back-filled grouting within shield tunnel. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on ground penetrating radar (GPR), pp 271–276

  • Zalik KR, Zalik B (2009) A sweep-line algorithm for spatial clustering. Adv Eng Softw 40:445–451

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund project AcoGPR (Adaptive Contactless Ground Penetrating Radar) under the Grant Agreement No. WA3 80122470 (Project webpage: http://acogpr.ismll.de).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Janning.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janning, R., Busche, A., Horváth, T. et al. Buried pipe localization using an iterative geometric clustering on GPR data. Artif Intell Rev 42, 403–425 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-013-9410-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-013-9410-2

Keywords

Navigation