Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental evaluation of pheromone models in ACOPlan

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the system ACOPlan for planning with non uniform action cost is introduced and analyzed. ACOPlan is a planner based on the ant colony optimization framework, in which a colony of planning ants searches for near optimal solution plans with respect to an overall plan cost metric. This approach is motivated by the strong similarity between the process used by artificial ants to build solutions and the methods used by state–based planners to search solution plans. Planning ants perform a stochastic and heuristic based search by interacting through a pheromone model. The proposed heuristic and pheromone models are presented and compared through systematic experiments on benchmark planning domains. Experiments are also provided to compare the quality of ACOPlan solution plans with respect to state of the art satisficing planners. The analysis of the results confirm the good performance of the Action–Action pheromone model and points out the promising performance of the novel Fuzzy–Level–Action pheromone model. The analysis also suggests general principles for designing performant pheromone models for planning and further extensions of ACOPlan to other optimization models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bacchus, F., Kabanza, F.: Using temporal logics to express search control knowledge for planning. Artif. Intell. 116, 123–191 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baioletti, M., Milani, A., Poggioni, V., Rossi, F.: An ACO approach to planning. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimisation, EVOCOP 2009 (2009)

  3. Baioletti, M., Milani, A., Poggioni, V., Rossi, F.: Ant search strategies for planning optimization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS 2009 (2009)

  4. Baioletti, M., Milani, A., Poggioni, V., Rossi, F.: Optimal planning with ACO. In: Proceedings of AI*IA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5883, pp. 212–221 (2009)

  5. Baioletti, M., Milani, A., Poggioni, V., Rossi, F.: PlACO: Planning with Ants. In: Proceedings of The 22nd International FLAIRS Conference. AAAI (2009)

  6. Blum, A., Furst, M.: Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artif. Intell. 90, 281–300 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Blum, C.: Ant colony optimization: introduction and recent trends. Physics of Life Reviews 2(4), 353–373 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Planning as heuristic search. Artif. Intell. 129(1–2), 5–33 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bylander, T.: The computational complexity of propositional strips planning. Artif. Intell. 69 (1–2), 165–204 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cialdea, M., Limongelli, C., Poggioni, V., Orlandini, A.: Linear temporal logic as an executable semantics for planning languages. J. Logic, Lang. Inf. 16, 63–89 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Conover, W.: Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley & Sons (1999)

  12. Do, M.B., Kambhampati, S.: Sapa: a multi-objective metric temporal planner. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 20, 155–194 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorigo, M., Stuetzle, T.: Ant Colony Optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Edelkamp, S., Kissmann, P.: Gamer: bridging planning and general game playing with symbolic search. In: Proceedings of IPC-6 Competition (2008)

  15. Garcia, M.P., Oscar Montiel, O.C., Sepulveda, R., Melin, P.: Path planning for autonomous mobile robot navigation with ant colony optimization and fuzzy cost function evaluation. Appl. Soft Comput. 9, 1102–1110 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerevini, A., Serina, I.: LPG: a planner based on local search for planning graphs. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling (AIPS’02). AAAI Press, Toulouse, France (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Helmert, M.: The fast downward planning system. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR). 26, 191–246 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Helmert, M., Do, M., Refanidis, I.: International Planning Competition IPC-2008. The Deterministic Part. http://ipc.icaps-conference.org/ (2008)

  19. Hoffmann, J., Nebel, B.: The FF planning system: fast plan generation through heuristic search. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 14, 253–302 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kautz, H., McAllester, D., Selman, B.: Encoding plans in propositional logic. In: Proceedings of KR-96, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kautz, H., Selman, B.: Unifying sat-based and graph-based planning. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-99, Stockholm (1999)

  22. Keyder, E., Geffner, H.: Heuristics for planning with action costs revisited. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2008, pp. 588–592 (2008)

  23. Menkes van den Briel, T.V., Kambhampati, S.: Loosely coupled formulations for automated planning: an integer programming perspective. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 31, 217–257 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nau, D., Ghallab, M., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann (2004)

  25. Richter, S., Westphal, M.: The lama planner using landmark counting in heuristic search. In: Proc. of IPC-6 Competition (2008)

  26. Rossi, F.: An aco approach to planning. Ph.D. thesis, Mathematics and Computer Science Dept., University of Perugia, Italy (2009)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Poggioni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baioletti, M., Milani, A., Poggioni, V. et al. Experimental evaluation of pheromone models in ACOPlan. Ann Math Artif Intell 62, 187–217 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-011-9265-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-011-9265-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2010)

Navigation