Skip to main content
Log in

Communication and Cooperation in Public Network Situations

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on sharing the costs and revenues of maintaining a public network communication structure. Revenues are assumed to be bilateral and communication links are publicly available but costly. It is assumed that agents are located at the vertices of an undirected graph in which the edges represent all possible communication links. We take the approach from cooperative game theory and focus on the corresponding network game in coalitional form which relates any coalition of agents to its highest possible net benefit, i.e., the net benefit corresponding to an optimal operative network. Although finding an optimal network in general is a difficult problem, it is shown that corresponding network games are (totally) balanced. In the proof of this result a specific relaxation, duality and techniques of linear production games with committee control play a role. Sufficient conditions for convexity of network games are derived. Possible extensions of the model and its results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Claus, A. and D. Kleitman. (1973). “Cost Allocation for a Spanning Tree.” Networks 3, 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curiel, I., J. Derks, and S. Tijs. (1989). “On BalancedGames and Games with Committee Control.” OR Spektrum 11, 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granot, D. and G. Huberman. (1981). “Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Games.” Mathematical Programming 21, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichiishi, T. (1981). “Super-Modularity: Applications to Convex Games and the Greedy Algorithm for LP.” Journal of Economic Theory 25, 283–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschler, M., B. Peleg, and L. Shapley. (1972). “The Kernel and Bargaining Set of Convex Games.” InternationalJournal of Game Theory 2, 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. (1977). “Graphs and Cooperation in Games.” Mathematics of Operations Research 2, 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1975). “On the Core of Linear Production Games.” Mathematical Programming 9, 358–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. (1971). “Cores of Convex Games.” InternationalJournal of Game Theory 1, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, W. (1991). “Network Models in Economics.” In J. Moder and S. Elmaghraby (eds.), The Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science, New York, Van Nostrand Reinold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slikker, M. and A. v.d. Nouweland. (2001). Social and Economic Networks in Cooperative Game Theory. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slikker, M. and A. v.d. Nouweland. (2000). “Network Formation with Costs for Establishing Links.” Review of Economic Design 5, 333–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research of Jeroen Suijs has been made possible by a fellowship of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suijs, J., Borm, P., Hamers, H. et al. Communication and Cooperation in Public Network Situations. Ann Oper Res 137, 117–140 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-2249-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-2249-4

Keywords

Navigation