Skip to main content
Log in

Agent-based optimization for product family design

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a two-step approach to determine the optimal platform level for a selected set of product families and their variants. The first step employs a multi-objective optimization using an agent-based framework to determine the Pareto-design solutions for a given set of modules. The second step performs a post optimization analysis that includes application of the quality loss function (QLF) to determine the optimal platform level. The post optimization analysis yields the optimal platform level for a related set of product families and their variants. We demonstrate the working of the proposed method by using an example problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackenfelt, M. (2000). “Profit Maximization While Considering Uncertainty by Balancing Commonality and Variety Using Robust Design—The Redesign of a Family of Lift Tables.” Proceedings of ASME Design Engr. Technical Conferences, Baltimore, DFM–14013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmus, J., J.P. Gonzalez-Zugasti, and K. Otto. (2000). “Modular Product Architecture.” Proceedings of ASME Design Engr. Technical Conferences, Baltimore, DTM–14565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowlkes, W. Y. and C. M. Creveling. (1995). Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design: Using Taguchi Methods in Technology and Product Development.MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, K., H. Sakaguchi, and S. Akagi. (1999). “Product Variety Deployment and its Optimization under Modular Architecture and Module Commonalization.” Proceedings of ASME Design Engr. Technical Conferences, Las Vegas, Nevada, DFM–8923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. and K. Ishii. (1997). “Design for Variety: Development of Complexity Indices and Design Charts.” Procc. of ASME Design Engr. Technical Conf., Sacramento, DFM–4359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. and A. Lehnerd. (1997). The Power of Product Platforms. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phadke, M. S. (1989). Quality Engineering Using Robust Design. Canada: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, R. and V. Allada. (2003). “Modular product family design: Agent-based Pareto-Optimization and Quality Loss Function-based Post Optimal Analysis.” International Journal Production Research, 41(17), 4075–4098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, T., J. Maier, and F. Mistree. (1999). “A Product Platform Concept Exploration Method for Product Family Design.” Procc. of ASME Design Engr. Technical Conferences, Las Vegas, DTM–8761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zugasti-Gonzalez, J.P. and K. Otto. (2000). “Modular Platform-Based Product Family Design.” Proceedings ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Baltimore, DAC–14238.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkat Allada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rai, R., Allada, V. Agent-based optimization for product family design. Ann Oper Res 143, 147–156 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-7378-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-7378-x

Keywords

Navigation